Identifying factors for student retention of higher ed institutions using decision tree
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.13208Published:
2018-05-16Keywords:
Student Retention, Predictive Models, Variable Selection, Regression, Decision TreeAbstract
Student retention is an issue of high priority for many colleges and universities. Keeping students in school is the very basic condition for them to achieve their goals for going to colleges in the first place. A lot of research and practices have been done across institutions to improve student retention rates, but colleges and universities are still trying to figure out what are the factors that are most important to student retention. In this paper, we present our experiments of building predictive models, particularly decision tree models, to fit in the overall prediction of full time student retention. The data set of 1,965 cases from 1987 to 2000 obtained from the Delta Cost Project Database of the American Institutes for Research has 541 variables. We used variable selection measures like R-Squared to reduce to 45 variables and build decision tree models to fit the training data. Eight variables were identified to be most influential to the retention rates. Our experiments show that the decision trees with moderate depth are suitable for creating retention model.
References
[1] S. Alon and M. Tienda. Assessing the “mismatch†hypothesis: Differ-ences in college graduation rates by institutional selectivity. Sociology of education, 78(4):294–315, 2005.
[2] American Institutes for Research.Delta cost project database. http://www.deltacostproject.org/ delta-cost-project-database, 2012.
[3] P. Brotherton. It takes a campus to graduate a student: A look at seven academic retention programs and what makes them effective. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 18(18):34, 2001.
[4] B. Cook and N. Pullaro. College graduation rates: Behind the numbers. American Council on Education, 2010.
[5] K. Crockett, M. Heffron, and M. Schneider. Targeting financial aid for improved retention outcomes. Targeting Financial Aid for Improved Retention Outcomes, 2011.
[6] E. Jamelske. Measuring the impact of a university first-year experience program on student gpa and retention. Higher Education, 57(3):373—-391, 2009.
[7] J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, pages 159–174, 1977.
[8] E. J. M. Laur´ıa, J. D. Baron, M. Devireddy, V. Sundararaju, and S. M. Jayaprakash. Mining academic data to improve college student reten-tion: An open source perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd Interna-tional Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’12, pages 139–142. ACM, 2012.
[9] V. A. Lotkowski, S. B. Robbins, and R. J. Noeth. The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention. ACT Policy Report. American College Testing ACT Inc, 2004.
[10] A. Nandeshwar, T. Menzies, and A. Nelson. Learning patterns of uni-versity student retention. Expert Systems with Applications, 38:14984– 14996, 2011.
[11] National Center for Educational Statistic. Digest of education statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2016menu_ tables.asp, 2016.
[12] A. M. Olbrecht, C. Romano, and J. Teigen. How money helps keep stu-dents in college: The relationship between family finances, merit-based aid, and retention in higher education. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 46(1):2, 2016.
[13] S. M. Weiss and T. L. Robinson. An investigation of factors relating to retention of student–athletes participating in ncaa division ii athletics. Interchange, 44(1):83–104, 2013.
[14] P. A. Westrick, H. Le, S. B. Robbins, J. M. Radunzel, and F. L. Schmidt. College performance and retention: A meta-analysis of the predictive validities of ACT® scores, high school grades, and SES. Educational Assessment, 20(1):23–45, 2015.
[15] A. Wolff, Z. Zdrahal, A. Nikolov, and M. Pantucek. Improving reten-tion: Predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’13, pages 145–149. ACM, 2013.
C. H. Yu, S. DiGangi, A. Jannasch-Pennell, and C. Kaprolet. A data mining approach for identifying predictors of student retention from sophomore to junior year. Journal of Data Science, 8:307–325, 2010View Full Article:
How to Cite
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work''s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal''s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2018-05-23
Published 2018-05-16