An approach to implement interactive teaching in blended learning environments

  • Authors

    • Mohamed Sayed Arab Open UniversityFaculty of Computer Studies
  • Blended Active Learning, Classrooms Technology, Computer-Marked Assessment, E-Instructions.
  • The use of electronic response systems in classrooms can be effective, especially when coupled with a method allowing a question to be broken into manageable interactive questions. This paper develops the use of electronic response systems as a part of leading assessment delivery and data collection solutions in a blended learning environment. The technology that is the subject of this research consists of thirty-button response cards that transmit student responses to a receiver connected to the instructor laptop. The electronic response systems are proven to enhance the effective instructions, increase retentions, engage participants, and immediately assess understanding.

  • References

    1. [1] Agresti, A. and Finlay, B., “Statistical Methods for the Social Sciencesâ€, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River NJ, 2009.

      [2] Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F., “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate educationâ€, Biochemical Education, vol. 17, no.3, pp. 140–141, 1989.

      [3] Ding, L. and Beichner, R., “Approaches to Data Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questionsâ€, Physical Review Special Topics - Physical Education Research 5 020103, pp. 1–17, 2009.

      [4] Freeman, J. and Dobbie, A., “Use of an Audience Response System to Augment Interactive Learningâ€, Family Medicine, vol. 37, no.1, pp. 12–14, 2005.

      [5] Guthrie, R.W. and Carlin, A., “Waking the Dead: Using Interactive Technology to Engage Passive Listeners in the Classroomâ€, in Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems New York NY, pp. 1–8, 2004.

      [6] Hall, R.H., Collier, H.L., Thomas, M.L. and Hilgers, M.G., “A Student Response System for Increasing Engagement, Motivation, and Learning in High Enrollment Lecturesâ€, in Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 621–626, 2005.

      [7] Miller, T., “Formative Computer-Based Assessment in Higher Education: The effectiveness of Feedback in Supporting Student Learningâ€, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 34, no.2, pp. 181–192, 2008.

      [8] Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L. and DiLorenzo, T.M., “Efficacy of Personal Response Systems (“Clickersâ€) in Large, Introductory Psychology Classesâ€, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 35, no.1, pp. 45–50, 2008.

      [9] Sayed, M., “Blended Learning Environment: The Effectiveness in Developing Concepts and Thinking Skillsâ€, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 4, no. 25, pp. 12–17, 2013.

      [10] Sayed, M. and Baker, F., “Blended Learning Barriers: An Investigation, Exposition and Solutionsâ€, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 81–85, 2014.

      [11] Simpson, V. and Oliver, M., “Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A comparison of Research and Practiceâ€, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 187–208, 2007.

      [12] Stein, P.S., Challman, S.D. and Brueckner, J.K., “Using Audience Response Technology for Pretest Reviews in an Undergraduate Nursing Courseâ€, Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 469–473, 2006.

      [13] Torbeck, L., “Enhancing Programme Evaluation Using the Audience Response Systemâ€, Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1088–1089, 2007.

      [14] Vojak, C., Kline, S., Cope, B., McCarthey, S. and Kalantzis, M., “New Spaces and Old Places: An Analysis of Writing Assessment Softwareâ€, Computers & Composition, vol. 28, pp. 97–111, 2011.

      [15] Yourstone, S.A., Kraye, H.S. and Albaum, G., “Classroom Questioning with Immediate Electronic Response: Do Clickers Improve Learning?â€, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2008.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Sayed, M. (2015). An approach to implement interactive teaching in blended learning environments. Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Technology, 4(1), 37-42.