Modulation diversity for differential amplitude and phase shift keying technique

  • Authors

    • M Kanthimathi
    • R Amutha
    • S Anusha
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.1.9946

    Received date: March 8, 2018

    Accepted date: March 8, 2018

    Published date: December 21, 2017

  • Signal Space Diversity (SSD), Differential Detection, Wireless Sensor Network (WSN), Energy Efficiency, Spectral Efficiency.

  • Abstract

    Modulation diversity can reduce the bit error rate in fading channels. We make use of the advantage of modulation diversity in non-coherent differential modulation technique. Increase in modulation diversity is obtained by rotating signal constellation. Coordinate interleaved Differential amplitude and phase-shift keying modulation (DAPSK) is particularly advantageous compared to the Differential phase-shift keying (DPSK) technique. Energy optimization is done to minimize the energy consumption. Simulation results shows that the proposed differential detection for different rotation angle achieves better BER performance than constant phase differential detection with modulation diversity. The energy required to successfully transmit a bit is also reduced for proposed system compared to Differential phase shift keying based system.

  • References

    1. Webb WT, Hanzo L & Steele R, “Bandwidth efficient QAM schemes for Rayleigh fading channels”, IEEE Proc.I, Vol.138, No.3, (1991), pp.169–175. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-i-2.1991.0023.
    2. Boutros J & Viterbo E, “Signal space diversity: A power- and band-width-efficient diversity technique for the Rayeigh fading channel”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol.44, (1998), pp.1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.681321.
    3. Schober R & Lampe L, “Noncoherent receivers for differential space–time modulation”, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol.50, (2002), pp.768–777. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2002.1006558.
    4. Dallal YE & Shamai S, “Time diversity in DPSK noisy phase chan-nels”, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol.40, (1992), pp.1703–1715. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.179934.
    5. Hochwald BM & Sweldens W, “Differential unitary space–time modulation”, IEEE Trans.Commun., Vol.48, (2000), pp.2041–2052. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.891215.
    6. Engels V & Rohling H, “Multilevel differential modulation technique (64-DAPSK) for multicarrier transmission systems”, Eur. Trans. Tel-ecommun., Vol.6, No.6, (1995), pp.633–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4460060605.
    7. Benedetto S, Biglieri E & Daffara R, “Modeling and performance evaluation of nonlinear satellite links-a Volterra series approach”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, (1979), pp.494-507. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1979.308734.
    8. Pupolin S & Greenstein L, “Performance analysis of digital radio links with nonlinear transmit amplifiers”, IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, Vol.5, No.3, (1987), pp.534-546. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.1987.1146546.
    9. Ishibashi K, Ochiai H & Kohno R, “Low complexity bit-interleaved coded DAPSK for Rayleigh fading channels”, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., Vol.23, No.9, (2005), pp.1728–1738. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2005.853879.
    10. Liang XB & Xia XG, “Unitary signal constellations for differential space-time modulation with two transmit antennas: parametric codes, optimal designs, and bounds”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol.48, No.8, (2002), pp.2291-2322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2002.800498.
    11. Cui S, Goldsmith AJ & Bahai A, “Energy-efficiency of MIMO and cooperative MIMO techniques in sensor networks”, IEEE J. Sel. Ar-eas Commun., Vol.22, No.6, (2004), pp.1089-1098. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2004.830916.
    12. Taricco G & Viterbo E, “Performance of component interleaved sig-nal sets for fading channels”, IEEE Electronics Letters, Vol.32, No.13, (1996), pp.1170–1172. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19960816.
    13. De Oliveira Brante GG, Kakitani MT & Souza RD, “Energy effi-ciency analysis of some cooperative and non-cooperative transmis-sion schemes in wireless sensor networks”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol.59, No.10, (2011), pp.2671-2677. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2011.063011.100744.
    14. Maham B, Hjorungnes A & Narasimhan R, “Energy-efficient space-time coded cooperation in outage-restricted multihop wireless net-works”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 59, No.11, (2011), pp.3111-3121. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2011.082911.100280A.
    15. Jie D, Liu DP & Wu HR, “Energy efficiency of virtual MIMO transmission schemes for cluster-based wireless sensor networks”, The Journal of china universities of posts and telecommunications, Vol.18, No.4, (2011), pp.31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-8885(10)60080-5.
    16. Sheikhpour R & Jabbehdari S, “An energy efficient chain-based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks”, KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, Vol.7, No.6, (2013), pp.1357-1378. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2013.06.001.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Kanthimathi, M., Amutha, R., & Anusha, S. (2017). Modulation diversity for differential amplitude and phase shift keying technique. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(1.1), 418-420. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.1.9946