A technical survey on underwater communication

  • Authors

    • Saliq Afaque H Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
    • Vishal Dasari Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
    • T K Ramesh Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.9502

    Received date: February 11, 2018

    Accepted date: February 19, 2018

    Published date: February 27, 2018

  • Underwater Communication, Acoustic, Noise, Doppler Effect, Network Layers, Modems.
  • Abstract

    The world’s pace has elevated technology to a higher pinnacle in the field of communication, yet the research in underwater communication is progressing in a slow traverse due to its compound barriers. Underwater communication is one of the unique and challenging fields in communication engineering in the case of both designing and communication. It is limited by several factors like the multipath channel and frequency which is limiting the application of underwater communication. An appropriate choice of modulation will enable the device to give better data rates. As every communication needs higher data rates, appropriate devices must be coupled with multiple access methods to make it efficient and reliable. The paper is a plot of the data surveyed on underwater communication which combines of major challenges associated with underwater applications and the approaches to mitigate some of these challenges is data.

  • References

    1. I. F. Akyildiz and M. C. Vuran, “Wireless Sensor Networks” Hobo-ken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515181.
    2. A. Darehshoorzadeh, A. Boukerche, “Underwater sensor networks: A new challenge for opportunistic routing protocols,” IEEE Com-mun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 11, Nov. 2015 https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7321977.
    3. M. Obaidat, S. Misra, “Principles of Wireless Sensor Networks” Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.
    4. A. K. Sharma et al., “Magnetic induction-based non-conventional media communications: A review”, IEEE Sensors J., vol. 17, no. 4, Feb. 2017.
    5. Gunilla Burrowes, Jamil Y. Khan. “Short-Range Underwater Acous-tic Communication Networks, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles”. The University of New Castle. 2011.
    6. Yangze Dong, Hefeng Dong “Simulation Study on Cross-Layer De-sign for Energy Conservation in Underwater Acoustic Networks”. IEEE Oceanic Engineering130516-009, 2013.
    7. J.A. Catipovic, “Performance limitations in underwater acoustic te-lemetry”, Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of, 15(3):205–216, Jul 1990. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.107149.
    8. Azizul H. Quazi, William L. Konrad, “Underwater acoustic commu-nications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 20(2):24–30, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.1982.1090990.
    9. D.B. Kilfoyle, A.B. Baggeroer,”The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry”, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 25(1):4–27, Jan 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.820733.
    10. Do Viet Ha, Nguyen Van Duc, and Matthias Patzold,”SINR Analy-sis of OFDM Systems Using a Geometry-Based Underwater Acous-ticChannel Model”, Published in 2015 IEEE 26th International Sym-posium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC): Fundamentals and PHY.
    11. K. Lakshmi, P. Muralikrishna, and K P Soman,”Compressive esti-mation of UWA channels for OFDM transmission using iterative sparse reconstruction algorithms”,2013 International Mutli-Conference on Automation, Computing, Communication, Control and Compressed Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/iMac4s.2013.6526524.
    12. K A Unnikrishna Menon, Vrinda N Menon, and R D Aryadevi, “A novel approach for avoiding water vessel collisions using passive acoustic localization”, 2013 International Conference on Communi-cation and Signal Processing.
    13. A. F. Harris III,M. Stojanovic, and M. Zorzi,“When underwater acoustic nodes should sleep with one eye open: Idle-time power management in underwater sensor networks.” , In Proc.of ACM Intl. Workshop on Underwater Networks, pages 105–108, Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 2006.
    14. J. W. Hui, D. E.Culler,“IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks”, In Proc. of ACM Conference on Embedded Networked-Sensor Systems (Sensys), pages 15–28, Raleigh, NC, USA, Nov. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460412.1460415.
    15. J. Rice, D. Green, “Underwater acoustic communications and net-works for the US navy’s SEAWEB program”, In Proc. of IEEE Second International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Appli-cations (SENSORCOMM), August 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORCOMM.2008.137.
    16. B. Benson et al., “Design of a low-cost underwater acoustic modem,” IEEE Embedded Syst. Lett., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 58–61, Sep. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/LES.2010.2050191.
    17. S. Sendra. (2013), “Deployment of Efficient Wireless Sensor Nodes for Monitoring in Rural, Indoor and Underwater Environments”, Univ. Politècnica de València.
    18. A. Sanchez, S. Blanc, P. Yuste, and J. J. Serrano, “A low cost and high efficient acoustic modem for underwater sensor networks,” in Proc. IEEE-Spain OCEANS, Santander, Spain, Jun. 2011, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/Oceans-Spain.2011.6003428.
    19. L. Wu et al., “Designing an adaptive acoustic modem for underwater sensor networks,” IEEE Embedded Syst. Lett., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, Mar. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/LES.2011.2180013.
    20. K.A.Unnikrishna Menon, Shibina.J.S, and Vrinda.N.Menon, “Intel-ligent System for Remote Health Monitoring of Divers using Un-derwater Acoustic Communication”, IEEE, 2014 International Con-ference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technolo-gies (ICCCNT).
    21. Lakshmi K, P Muralikrishna, and K P Soman, “Compressive Estima-tion of UWA channels for OFDM transmission using iterative sparse reconstruction algorithms”, IEEE, 2013 International Multi-Conference on Automation, Computing, Communication, Control and Compressed Sensing (iMac4s).
    22. N. Nowsheen, C. Benson, and M. Frater, “A high data-rate, soft-waredefined underwater acoustic modem”, IEEE OCEANS, Sydney, Australia, May 2010.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Afaque H, S., Dasari, V., & Ramesh, T. K. (2018). A technical survey on underwater communication. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.9502