Implementation and analysis of stability improvement in VANET using different scenarios

  • Authors

    • Sahil Verma
    • Sonu Mittal
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.2.9041

    Received date: January 4, 2018

    Accepted date: January 4, 2018

    Published date: December 28, 2017

  • Abstract

    In circumstances where hubs are portable or when hubs frequently turn now and again, the neighborhood topology infrequently stays static. Henceforth, it is important that every hub communicates its refreshed area data to the greater part of its neighbors. These area refresh parcels are normally alluded to as reference points. In most geographic directing conventions (e.g., GPSR), guides are communicated occasionally to maintain an exact neighbor list at every hub. Position refreshes are expensive from numerous points of view. Each refresh devours hub vitality; remote data transfer capacity, and expands the danger of parcel crash at the medium access control (MAC) layer. Parcel impacts cause bundle misfortune which thusly influences the directing execution because of diminished precision in deciding the right nearby topology.

  • References

    1. Bhagyashri Pete, and Prachi Jaini, “Continuous Connectivity Aware Routing in VANET Using Hybrid Protocol,” IEEE sponsored 2nd international conference on electronic and communication system (ICECS), pp. 1695 – 1700, Feb. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECS.2015.7124897.
    2. Sandeep Kaur, and Kamaljit Kaur, “An New Improved GPSR (I-GPSR) Routing Protocol For VANET,” Imperial Journal of Inter-disciplinary Research (IJIR), vol. 2, no.7, pp. 1190-1196, 2016.
    3. Jing Zuo, Yuhao Wang , Yuan Liu and Yan Zhang, “Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol in VANET with Vehicle-node Den-sity,” Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Compu-ting (WiCOM), 6th International Conference, pp. 1 - 4, Sept. 2010.
    4. Nicholas Loulloudes, George Pallis, and Marios D. Dikaiakos, “On the Performance Evaluation of VANET Routing Protocols in Large-Scale Urban Environments (Poster)”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258842825, IEEE 8th In-ternational Conference, Nov. 2012.
    5. Quanjun Chen, Salil S. Kanhere, and Mahbub Hassan, “Adaptive Position Update for Geographic Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Net-works”, IEEE Xplore, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 489 - 501, mar. 2013.
    6. Siddhant Jaiswal, and Dr D. S. Adane, “Hybrid Approach for Routing in Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) Using Clustering Approach”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Com-puter and Communication Engineering, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1211 - 1219 July 2013.
    7. Khadige Abboud, and Weihua Zhuang, “Modeling and Analysis for Emergency Messaging Delay in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks”, IEEE Sponsored Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1 - 6, 2009.
    8. Shruti R. Kolte, and Mangala S. Madankar, “Adaptive Congestion Control for Transmission of Safety Messages in VANET,” Interna-tional Conference for Convergence of Technology, pp. 1 - 6, 2014.
    9. Bilal Munir Mughal, Asif Ali Wagan, and Halabi Hasbullah, “Effi-cient Congestion Control in VANET for Safety Messaging,” IEEE xplore , pp. 978 - 995, 2010.
    10. Chandan Ratnani, V. B. Vaghela, and D. J. Shah, “A Novel Archi-tecture for Vehicular Traffic Control,” IEEE Sponsored Interna-tional Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT), pp. 277 - 282, 2015.
    11. Jing Zhao, “Data Pouring and Buffering on the Road: A New Data Dissemination Paradigm for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE transaction on vehicular technology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 3266-3277, Nov. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2007.906412.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Verma, S., & Mittal, S. (2017). Implementation and analysis of stability improvement in VANET using different scenarios. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(1.2), 151-154. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.2.9041