The Measurement of Non-Performing Finance Using the Approaches of Market Segmentation in Islamic Banking

  • Authors

    • Nanik Wahyuni
    • Sutrisno T
    • Erwin Saraswati
    • Abdul Ghofar
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.26801

    Received date: January 30, 2019

    Accepted date: January 30, 2019

    Published date: February 16, 2026

  • Islamic banking, non performing finance, market segmentation.

  • Abstract

    Background: Research shows that financial variables are not enough to predict the success of future bank, thus we have to think again about the measurement of non-performing finance to see company’s success. Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the measurement of non-performing finance to the approaches of market segmentation (product, professional, the image of the bank, and the principles of the bank) at Islamic banks. Result: The result shows that concurrently there is an influence of independent variable into dependent variable;however, the professional variable and image of the bank is not significantly influencing the non-performing finance of Islamic banking. Conclusion: The dominant variable affecting into non-performing finance is a product, so that the variation of the product that is offered by Islamic banks to market or costumer should be taken care. The implementation of the right Islamic principles is also being a costumer’s attention. The upcoming research is advised to concurrently integrate the measurement of financing and non-performing finance to know the complete Islamic banks performing conditions.

  • References

    1. Abdel-Maksouda, A., David, D., dan Robert, L. 2005. Non-financial Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Companies. The British Ac-counting Review, 37, 261-297.
    2. Bashir, A.-H. M. (2001). Assesing the performance of islamic Banks : some evidence from the middle east].
    3. Bititci, Umit S. A. S. C. a. L. M. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. International Jurnal Of Operational and Production Management, Vol 17 No. 5, 22-34.
    4. Gomes, Carlos F., M. M. Y., João V. Lisboa. (2007). An empirical investigation of manufacturing performance measures utilization: The perspec-tives of executives and financial analysts. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 56(Iss:3), pp.187 -204.
    5. Gosselin, M. (2005). An Empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Perfor-mance Management, Vol. 54 No. 5/6, 419 - 437.
    6. Hoque, Z. 2004. A Contingency Model of The Association Between Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance Measurement: Impact on Organizational Performance. International Bussiness Review, 13. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.003
    7. Holzer, H. P., & Norreklit, H. (1991). Management Accounting and Control Systems. Tijdschrift voor Economic en Management, Volume XXXVI.
    8. Jusoh, R. 2008. The Performance Consequence of Multiple Performance Measures Usage (Evidence from the Malaysian manufactures). Interna-tional Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57 (2), 119 - 136.
    9. Laitinen, E. K. (2004). Nonfinancial Factors as Predictors of Value Creation:Finnish Evidence Review of Accounting and Finance, Volume 3 Number 3.
    10. Laitinen, E. K. (2004b). Nonfinancial Factors as Predictors of Value Creation: Finnish Evidence Review of Accounting and Finance, 3 (3).
    11. Mostage Md, Hussain. A. G. S. (2002). Managament Accounting and Performance Measurement in Japanese Banks. Managing Service Quality, volume 12 Number 4, 232 - 245.
    12. Nelson, W., dan Enrico, U. 2008. Predicting Change in Management Accounting Systems: A Contingent Approach Problems and Perspectives in Management, 6 (2).
    13. Robinson, Herbert S. C. J. A., Patricia M. Carrillo, Ahmed M. Al-Ghassani. (2005). Business performance measurement practices in construction engineering organisations. Measuring Business Excellence, volume 9 Iss 1, 13 - 22.
    14. Waweru, N., & Uliana, E. (2008). Predicting change in management accounting systems: a contingent approach Problems and Perspectives in Man-agement, 6(2).

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Wahyuni, N., T, S., Saraswati, E., & Ghofar, A. (2026). The Measurement of Non-Performing Finance Using the Approaches of Market Segmentation in Islamic Banking. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(1.9), 491-493. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.26801