Breast Cancer Prognosis Using Learning Vector Quantization Neural Network Technique

  • Authors

    • W. Abdul Hameed
    • Raja Das
    • Jitendra Jaiswal
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.26789

    Received date: January 30, 2019

    Accepted date: January 30, 2019

    Published date: October 2, 2018

  • Neural networks, Learning Vector Quantization, Breast cancer Prognosis, recurrence / non-recurrence, Classification.

  • Abstract

    A suitable treatment coming after surgery is very much motivated by prognosis - the speculated outcome of the disease. Now-a-days improving prognostic prediction is a challenging task to the doctors. This paper presents prognosis for the breast cancer issues by applying Neural Network Architecture with the dataset for Wisconsin Prognostic Breast Cancer. The accuracy is evaluated by adopting algorithm for Kohonen’s first issue of Learning Vector Quantization to predict the recurrence of the disease within 2 years or beyond and also within 5 years or beyond.

  • References

    1. W. H. Wolberg, W. N. Street, and O. L. Mangasarian (1994), Ma-chine Learning Techniques to diagnose Breast Cancer from Image-processed Nuclear Features of Fine Needle Aspirates, Cancer Let-ters, vol. 77, pp. 163-171.
    2. W. N. Street (2000), Xcyt: A system for remote cytological diagno-sis and prognosis of breast cancer, soft-computing Techniques in Breast Cancer Prognosis and Diagnosis, World Scientific Publica-tions.
    3. R. M. Ripley (1998), Neural network for Breast cancer Prognosis, Ph.D., Thesis, Department of Engineering Science, University of Ox-ford.
    4. H. B. Burke, and P. H. Goodman (1997), Artificial neural network improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction, Cancer Journal, vol. 99, pp. 857-862.
    5. P. L. Choong, and C. J. S. deSilva (1996), Entropy maximization networks, An application to breast cancer prognosis, IEEE Transac-tion Neural Network, vol. 7, pp. 568-577.
    6. P. L. Choong, and C. J. S. deSilva (1998), Maximum entropy esti-mation vs. multivariate logistic regression: Which should be used for the analysis of small binary outcome data sets ?, Proc. 20th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 3, pp. 1602-1605.
    7. H. Sekar, M. Odetayo, D. Petrovic, R. N. Naguib, C. Bartolic, L. Alasio, M. S. Lakshmi and G. V. Sherbet (2000), A fuzzy meas-urement based assessment of breast cancer prognostic markers, Proc. Of 2000 IEEE EMBS Int. conf. on Information Tech. Applications in Biomedicine, pp174-178.
    8. O. L. Mangasarian, W. N. Street, and W. H. Wolberg (1995), Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming, Op-erations Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 570-577.
    9. W. N. Street (1994), Cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear pro-gramming based machine learning, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
    10. http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/machine-learning-databases/breast cancer-Wisconsin/Wisconsin Diagnosis Breast Cancer (WDBC) Dataset and Wisconsin Prognostic Breast Cancer (WPBC) Dataset
    11. W. H. Wolberg, SW. N. Street, and O. L. Mangasarian (1995), Im-age analysis and machine learning applied to breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis, Anal Quant cytol , vol. 17, pp. 77-87.
    12. W. S. McCullogh (1943), W. Pitts, Bull Maths Biophysics, vol. 5, pp. 115-118.
    13. D. E. Rummelhart, J. L. McLelland (1987), Parallel distributed pro-cessing: Explorations in the microstructure of Cognition, Founda-tion, MIT Press, vol. I.
    14. J. J. Hopfield (1982), Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. pp. 2554-2558.
    15. T. Kohonen (1982), Self-organized formation of topologically cor-rect feature maps, Biological cybernetics, vol. 43, pp. 59-69.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Abdul Hameed, W., Das, R., & Jaiswal, J. (2018). Breast Cancer Prognosis Using Learning Vector Quantization Neural Network Technique. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.10), 922-924. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.26789