Social Network Accelerates to Strengthen the Relationship between Teachers and Their Students
About this article
Abstract
To make sure that relationship can play an important role in building community as well as knowledge; this article is going to highlight the relationship between teacher-students, teacher-teachers, and student-students by using communities’ detection in social network, and this is done by calculating betweenness for all edges and applying the edge removal approach. This paper will make a bridge between the students and the teachers to decide whether this interaction helps to encourage and increase the level of students as well as the teacher performance.
ÂKeywords
- Social network
- relationship
- community
- betweenness
- edge removal approach.
References
[1] Grabner-Krautera, S. and E. Kaluscha. 2003. Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 783–812.
[2] Van Zyl, A. 2009. The impact of Social Networking 2.0 on organisations, http://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/4886/vanzyl_impact_2009.pdf.txt?sequence=5 (December 1, 2011)
[3] Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Hampton, K. and B. Wellman. 2003. Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277–311.
[5] Wang, Y. and G. Wong. 1987. Stochastic blockmodels for directed graphs, 82 (8)K
[6] Mika, P. October 2005. Flink: Semantic web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. Journal of Web Semantics 3, pp. 211–223.
[7] Lada, A. and A.A. Eytan. 2003. Friends and Neighbors on the Web. Social networks 25, 211-230
[8] Strogatz S.H. 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature (London) 410:268–276, pmid:11258382 doi:10.1038/35065725
[9] Leann, M.T., Z. Ann and J. Farnham. 1998. Social relationships in locality and livelihood: The embeddedness of rural economic restructuringâ€, Journal of Rural Studies 14 (2), pp. 203-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167 (97)00037-5
[10] Viegas, F.B., S. Golder and J. Donath. 2006. Visualizing Email Content: Portraying Relationships from Conversational Histories. Proc. pp. 979–988.
[11] Newman, M. E. J. 2001. The Structure Of Scientific Collaboration Networks.Pnas 98 (2) 404-409; https://Doi.Org/10.1073/Pnas.98.2.404
[12] Barabási, A. L. and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of Scaling In Random Networks. Science 286, 509–512
[13] Hanneman, A. and M. Riddle. Introduction to social network methods. online at http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/ hanneman/nettext/
[14] Wilson, C., Sala, A., K. P. N. Puttaswamy and B. Y. Zhao. 2012. Beyond social graphs: User interactions in online social networks and their implications. ACM Trans. DOI : 10.1145/2382616.2382620 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2382616.2382620
[15] Garriss, S., M.Kaminsky, M. J.Freedman, B. Karp, D. Mazi‘Eres, and H. Yu. 2006. Re: Reliable email. In Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI’06).
[16] Singh, H and R Sharma. 2012. Role of Adjacency Matrix & Adjacency List in Graph Theory August 2012. International Journal of Computers & Technology.
[17] Stacey, S. G. A. 2008. New Adjacency Matrix for Finite Graphs. Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 18(3):979-991. DOI: 10.1007/s00006-008-0116-5
[18] Girvan, M. and M. E. J. Newman. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Edited by Lawrence A. Shepp, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey–New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ.
[19] Hashimoto, T.B., M. Nagasaki, K. Kojima and S.Miyano. 2009. A node and edge betweenness based fast layout algorithm for large scale networksâ€. BMC Bioinformatics. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-19.
[20] El Emary, I. and A.Brzozowska (Eds.). 2017. Shaping the Future of ICT. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Chapter 6 pages Artificial Intelligence in E-Learning.
[21] AlaouiHarouni, H., E. Hachem. and C. Ziti. 2016. Data mining for the service of intelligent tutoring system. Int.J.Mult.disc.scie, 1(1), 61 -65