Hydrodynamic Assessment of a Dual-Rotor Horizontal Axis Marine Current Turbine

Authors and Affiliations

  • EJ Avital
  • K Ai
  • N Venkatesan
  • A Samad
  • T Korakianitis

About this article

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.21039

Download PDF

Keywords:

Rectilinear tidal current, horizontal-axis turbine, dual-rotor, hydrodynamics

Abstract

The hydrodynamic performance of a dual-rotor horizontal axis marine turbine (HAMCT) is investigated for the power gain in operating the rear rotor without blade-pitch control. This kind of turbine can be advantageous for a rectilinear tidal current of reversing directions, where each rotor blade is optimally fixed-pitched towards its upstream velocity. The blade element momentum (BEM) method is coupled with the Park wake model. A generic three-blade turbine is shown to gain up to 20% in the coefficient of power CP as relative to the front rotor CP when operating the rear rotor at the same tip speed ratio (TSR) as the front one, gaining overall CP up to 0.55. Analytic model is derived to backup the estimate of power gain. Plots for turbine performance variation with TSR and profile hydrodynamic efficiency are given, and analysed for lab and small-medium size turbines.

References

Ai K, Avital EJ, Korakianitis T, Samad A and Venkatesan N (2016) “Surface wave effect on marine current turbine, modelling and analy-sis” International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engi-neering ICMAE 7th, London, pp 180-184

Ai K, Avital EJ, Shen X, Samad A and Venkatesan N (2018) “The surface curvature effect on performance of a laboratory scale tidal turbine” IAENG World Congress on Engineering WCE-2018, London

Bai X, Avital EJ, Munjiza A and Williams JJR (2014) “Numerical simulation of a marine current turbine in free surface flow” Renewa-ble Energy 63, 715-723

Benelghali S, Benbouzid M and Charpentier JF (2007) “Marine tidal current electric power generation technology: State of the art & cur-rent status” ICEMDC09, Antalya

Charlier RH (2003) “A sleeper awakes: tidal current power” Renewa-ble Sustainable Energy Review 7, 515-529

View more references (19)

Hansen MOL (2008), Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines 2nd Ed, Earthscan, London, pp. 45-62

Heffron A, Williams JJ and Avital EJ (2016) “Flow separation and passive flow control on E387 airfoil”, 54th AIAA Aerospace Scienc-es Meeting AIAA 2016-0324, San Diego

Jacobs EN and Sherman A (1937) “Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number” NACA-TR-586

Karthikeya T, Ezhilsabareesh K, Samad A, Venkatesan N and Avital E (2016) “Parametric analysis of a tidal current turbine using CFD techniques” Renew 2016, Lisbon, CRC Press, pp. 553-557

Korakianitis T, Rezaienia M, Shen X, Avital EJ, Munjiza A, Wen P, J Williams JJR (2015) “Aerodynamics of wind turbine technology” Handbook of clean energy systems, Vol 1, pp. 1-22

Leishman JG (2009) “Aerodynamic performance considerations in the design of a coaxial proprotor” Journal of American Helicopter Society 54, 012005

Luznik L, Flack KA, Lust EE, Taylor K (2013) “The effect of surface waves on the performance characteristics of a model tidal turbine” Renewable Energy 58, 108-114

Ng KW, Lam WH and Ng KC (2013) “2002-12: 10 years of research progress in horizontal axis marine current turbines” Energies 6, 1497-1526

Marden JR, Ruben SD and Pao LY (2013) “A model-free approach to wind farm control using game theoretic methods” IEEE Transaction Control System Technology 21(4), 1207-1214

Moriarty and Hansen (2005) “Aerodyn Theory model” NREL/TP-500-36881

Quayle SD and Rennie AEW (2007) “Integrating computational fluid dynamic and prototyping technologies in the investigation of multi-element profiles of a high lift variable pitch vertical axis tidal genera-tors” International Journal of Agile Systems 2 (2), 222-236

Rosen A (1987), Wind turbines lecture notes, Technion press, Haifa

Shen X, Avital E, Rezaienia MA, Paul G and Korakianitis T (2017) “Computational methods for investigation of surface curvature ef-fects on airfoil boundary layer behaviour” Journal of Algorithms and Computational Technology 11(1), 68-82

Shen X, Avital E, Paul G, Rezaienia MA, Wen P and Korakianitis T (2017) “Experimental study of surface curvature effects on aerody-namics of low Reynolds number airfoil for small wind turbines” Journal of Renewable Sustainable Energy 8(5), 053303

Singha O, Venkatesan N, Samad A and Avital EJ (2016) “Modeling and controller implementation of tidal turbine for Indian remote is-lands” International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engi-neering ICMAE 7th, London pp. 279-284

Snel and Schepers (1995) “Join investigation of dynamic inflow ef-fects and implementation of an engineering method” ECN-C—94-107

Tangler and Kocurek (2004), “Wind turbine post-stall airfoil perfor-mance characteristics guidelines for BEM methods”, NREL/CP-500-36900

Yan Y, Avital EJ, Korakianitis T (2018) “CFD analysis for the per-formance of Gurney flap on airfoil vertical axis turbine” International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering ICMAE 9th, Budapest

Zhu W, Zhang X and Gao J (2017) “Development of a single power controller for horizontal-axis stand alone tidal current energy system” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 10(1/2), 117-127


How to Cite

Avital, E., Ai, K., Venkatesan, N., Samad, A., & Korakianitis, T. (2018). Hydrodynamic Assessment of a Dual-Rotor Horizontal Axis Marine Current Turbine. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.10), 455-459. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.21039

Downloads