Multivariable Classification of Countries of the World in Terms of Innovation Development

Authors

  • Natalia Victorovna Kuznetsova
  • Ekaterina Victorovna Kocheva
  • Nikolay Anatolievich Matev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.17027

Keywords:

innovations, grand challenges, multidimensional group, cluster, leading countries

Abstract

The article makes an attempt to contribute to the scientific literature on the issues of directions of intercountry integration from the point of innovative development and understanding of a new structure of integration associations of countries, leaders of innovation development, which will determine the top level of development. The results of the multivariable classification of 189 countries in terms of innovative development show that the countries are divided into five clusters. Moreover, the leading countries that form the "core" of the cluster are identified within each group. Also, there is a high differentiation in all indicators characterizing innovation development of the countries as evidenced by the calculated coefficients of variation.

 

 

References

[1]. J. Howard-Grenville, S.J. Buckle, B.J. Hoskins, G. George, Climate change and management, Academy of Management Journal 57 (2014) 615–623.

[2]. C.T. Kulik, S. Ryan, S. Harper, G. George, Aging populations and management, Academy of Management Journal 57 (2014) 929–935.

[3]. G. George, S. Schillebeeckx, T.L. Liak, The management of natural resources: An overview and research agenda, Academy of Management Journal 58 (2015) 1595–1613.

[4]. E. Milbergs, N. Vonortas. Innovation Metrics: Measurement to Insight. Innovation Management. http://www.innovationmanagement.se/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Innovation-Metrics-NII.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[5]. The Global Innovation Index 2012. Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth. WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=247. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[6]. S. Mazurenko, Innovations are a symbiosis of state policy and market relations, Izvestiya, December 5, 2008.

[7]. V.N. Kiselev. Comparative analysis of innovative activity of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Innovative economy 4 (2010) 44-55

[8]. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2016. Methodology Report. European Innovation Scoreboards (EIS) project for the European Commission. https://startupgreece.gov.gr/sites/default/files/eis_2016_methodology_report.pdf. Accessed

[9]. European Innovation Scoreboard 2005. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Astrid Online. http://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/protected/Euro/European-Innovation-Scorebord-12_01_.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[10]. European Innovation Scoreboard 2006. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Berlin Partner. https://www.berlin-partner.de/fileadmin/user_upload/01_chefredaktion/02_pdf/studien-rankings/2006/INNO-Metrics%20-%20European%20Innovation%20Scoreboard%20-EIS-%20%282006%20english%29.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[11]. M. Porter, S. Stern, The New Challenge to America’s Prosperity: Findings from the Innovation Index, Council on Competiveness, Washington, DC, 1999.

[12]. R.D. Atkinson, D.K. Correa, The State of the New Economy, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Kansas City, 2007.

[13]. The Boston Consulting Group. The innovation Imperative in Manufacturing. How the United States Can Restore Its Edge. http://www.bcg.com/documents/file15445.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[14]. Klaus Schwab. The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[15]. European Innovation Scoreboard 2009. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/1341/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[16]. International Innovation Index Country Ranking. ARREPIM. http://stats.areppim.com/archives/insight_innovrank2011.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[17]. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012. Measuring innovation performance for 190 regions. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris-2012_en.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[18]. The Innovation Index. StatsAmerica. http://www.statsamerica.org/innovation/reports/sections2/4.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[19]. Rating of Innovative Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. HSE. http://www.hse.ru/primarydata/rir2012. Accessed June 29, 2018.

Downloads

Published

25-07-2018

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3.14 (2018): Special Issue 14

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal''s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See  The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Victorovna Kuznetsova, N., Victorovna Kocheva, E., & Anatolievich Matev, N. (2018). Multivariable Classification of Countries of the World in Terms of Innovation Development. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.14), 360-368. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.17027