Impact Properties of Aluminum Foam – Nanosilica FilledBasalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer Sandwich Composites

  • Authors

    • Nurul Emi Nor Ain Mohammad
    • Aidah Jumahat
    • Mohamad Fashan Ghazali
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11.15934

    Received date: July 20, 2018

    Accepted date: July 20, 2018

    Published date: July 21, 2018

  • Aluminium foam, Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Impact Properties
  • Abstract

    This paper investigates the effect of nanosilica on impact and energy absorption properties of sandwich foam-fibre composites. The materials used in this study are closed-cell aluminum (Al) foam (as the core material) that is sandwiched in between nanomodified basalt fiber reinforced polymer (as the face-sheets). The face sheets were made of Basalt Fibre, nanosilica and epoxy polymer matrix. The sandwich composite structures are known to have the capability of resisting impact loads and good in absorbing energy. The objective of this paper is to determine the influence of closed-cell aluminum foam core and nanosilica filler on impact properties and fracture behavior of basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) sandwich composites when compared to the conventional glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) sandwich composites. The drop impact tests were carried out to determine the energy absorbed, peak load and the force-deflection behaviour of the sandwich composite structure material. The results showed that the nanomodified BFRP-Al foam core sandwich panel exhibited promising energy absorption properties, corresponding to the highest specific energy absorption value observed. Also, the result indicates that the Aluminium Foam BFRP sandwich composite exhibited higher energy absorption when compared to the Aluminium foam GFRP sandwich composite.

  • References

    1. N Rajesh Mathivan, J Jerald, “Experimental Investigation of low velocity impact characteristics of woven glass fiber epoxy matrix composite laminate,” Journal of materials and design, vol 31, pp.4553-4560, 2010.
    2. M. F. Ismail, A. Jumahat, N. Ahmad, M. H. Ismail, "Low-Velocity Impact of Aluminium Foam -Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic Sand-wich Panels," Advanced Material Research, Vol 1113, pp. 74–79, 2015.
    3. S. Feli and Mahdipour Jalilian, “Three Dimensional Solution of Low Velocity Impact on Sandwich Panels with Hybrid Nanocomposite Face sheets,” Journal of Mech. Adv. Material Structure, vol. 6494, 2017.
    4. Y. Zhao, Y. Sun, R. Li, Q. Sun, and J. Feng, “Response of Aramid Honeycomb Sandwich Panels Subjected to Intense Impulse Load-ing by Mylar Flyer,” Int. J. Impact Eng., Vol. 104, 2017.
    5. Y. Wu, Q. Liu, J. Fu, Q. Li, and D. Hui, “Dynamic Crash Respons-es of Bio-Inspired Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with CFRP Panels,” Composites Part B, pp. 1–12,2017. DOI 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.030.
    6. J. Gustin, A. Joneson, M. Mahinfalah, and J. Stone, “Low Velocity Impact of Combination Kevlar/Carbon Fiber Sandwich Compo-sites,” Composite Structures,Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 396–406, 2005.
    7. P. N. B. Reis, J. a. M. Ferreira, P. Santos, M. O. W. Richardson, and J. B. Santos, “Impact Response of Kevlar Composites with Filled Epoxy Matrix,” Composite Structures, Vol. 94, No. 12, pp. 3520–3528, 2012.
    8. P. N. B. Reis, J. a. M. Ferreira, P. Santos, M. O. W. Richardson, and J. B. Santos, “Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix,” Composite Structures, Vol. 94, No. 12, pp. 3520–3528, 2012.
    9. T. Liu, S. Hou, X. Nguyen, and X. Han, “Energy Absorption Char-acteristics of Sandwich Structures with Composite Sheets and Bio Coconut Core,” Composites Part B, Vol. 114, pp. 328–338, 2017.
    10. J. Pablo, G. Francucci, J. Xiong, and A. Stocchi, “Composites: Part A Failure mode maps of natural and synthetic fiber reinforced com-posite sandwich panels,” Composites Part A, Vol. 94, pp. 217–225, 2017.
    11. E. R. Thorhallsson, “Basalt Fibers Advanced Materials for Various Applications”, Composites Part B Eng.,Vol 36, pp. 13, 2013.
    12. V. Fiore, T. Scalici, G. Di Bella, and A. Valenza, “A Review on Basalt Fibre and Its Composites,” Composites Part B Eng., Vol. 74, pp. 74–94, 2015.
    13. G. Morada, R. Ouadday, A. Vadean, and R. Boukhili, “Low-Velocity Impact Resistance of ATH / Epoxy Core Sandwich Com-posite Panels: Experimental and Numerical Analyses,” Composites Part B, vol. 114, pp. 418–431, 2017.
    14. Y. Chen, S. Hou, K. Fu, X. Han, and L. Ye, “Low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich structures: Modelling and experi-ment”, Composites Structure, Vol.168, pp-322-334, 2017.
    15. A. Jumahat, C. Soutis, F.R. Jones, A. Hodzic, “Improved compres-sive properties of a unidirectional CFRP laminate using nanosilica particles,” Advanced Composites Letters, Vol. 19(6), pp. 204-207, 2010.
    16. Y. Tian, H. Zhang and Z.Zhang, Influence of Nanoparticles on the Interfacial Properties of Fiber-Reinforced epoxy Composites”, Composites Part A, Vol. 98, pp 1-8, 2017.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Emi Nor Ain Mohammad, N., Jumahat, A., & Fashan Ghazali, M. (2018). Impact Properties of Aluminum Foam – Nanosilica FilledBasalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer Sandwich Composites. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.11), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11.15934