A Study on SDLC For Water Fall and Agile

  • Authors

    • D Naga malleswari
    • M Pavan Kumar
    • D sathvika
    • B Ajay Kumar
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.32.13516

    Received date: May 30, 2018

    Accepted date: May 30, 2018

    Published date: May 31, 2018

  • Waterfall Model, Agile Model.

  • Abstract

    This examination manages an essential and basic issue in PC world. It is worried about the improvement procedure of programming. This objective can be accomplished with the assistance of different programming improvement models accessible. The improvement models are instruments that enable us to effectively take after the means to make programming that meets a business require. There are diverse SDLC models with their separate upsides and downsides. In IT world every one of these procedures are joined Any model is executed by taking in setting each perspective and legitimate secrecy and uprightness. Accessibility controls are arranged and incorporated with programming application directly through the product lifecycle. Right now, the utilization of, mindfulness in, and discussion about dexterous approach have acknowledged sensational development. We have portrayed the characteristics of some conventional and dexterous systems that are far and wide utilized as a part of programming advancement. We have likewise examined the qualities and shortcoming between the two contradicting techniques and gave the difficulties related actualizing nimble procedures in the product business.

  • References

    1. J. Highsmith, The great methodologies debate: Part2, Cutter IT Journal, vol. 15, 2002.
    2. Andrew Begel, NachiappanNagappan, “Usage and Percep-tions of Agile Software Development in an Industrial Con-text: An Explora-tory Study” Microsoft Research One Mi-crosoft Way Redmond, WA 98052.
    3. S. R. Palmer and J. M. Felsing, A Practical Guide to Fea-ture-Driven Development, 2002.
    4. K. Beck, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Sec-ond ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 2005.
    5. R. McCauley, Agile Development Methods Poised to Upset Status Quo, SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 33, pp.14 - 15, 2001.
    6. Extreme Programming. What is Extreme Programming? [Online
    7. Cockburn, Agile Software Development. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
    8. Cockburn, Crystal Clear: A Human-Powered Method-ology for Small Teams: Addison Wesley, 2004.
    9. Extreme Programming. What is Extreme Programming? [Online
    10. P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, J. Ronkainen, and J. Warsta, Agile soft-ware development methods: Review and Analysis. Espoo, Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Publications 478.
    11. P. Schuh, Recovery, Redemption, and Extreme Pro-gramming, IEEE Software, vol. 18, pp. 34-41, 2001.
    12. J. Noll and D. C. Atkinson, Comparing Extreme Pro-gramming to Traditional Development for Student Projects: A Case Study, pre-sented at XP2003, Genova, Italy, 2003.
    13. K. Schwaber and M. Beedle, Agile Software Develop-ment with SCRUM: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
    14. K. Schwaber and M. Beedle, Agile Software Develop-ment with SCRUM: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
    15. D. Turk, R. France and B. Rumpe, Limitations of agile software processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineer-ing, 2002.
    16. M. Stephens, Rosenberg, D., Extreme Programming Re-factored: The Case Against XP: Apress, 2003.
    17. R. Baskerville, L. Levine, J. Pries-Heje, B. Ramesh, and S. Slaugh-ter, How Internet companies negotiate quality, IEEE Computer, vol. 34, pp. 5157, 2001.
    18. R. Baskerville and J. Pries-Heje, Racing the E-bomb: How the In-ternet is redefining information systems develop-ment methodolo-gy, in Realigning research and practice in IS development, B. Fitz-gerald, N. Russo, and J. DeGross, Eds. New York: Kluwer, 2001, pp. 49-68.
    19. Object-oriented programming. [Online
    20. Hassan Hajjdiab and Al Shaima Taleb “Adopting Agile Software Development: Issues and Challenges” in Interna-tional Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC) Vol. 2, No. 3, Sep-tember 2011.
    21. S. W. Ambler, “Agile Architecture: Strategies for Scaling Agile de-velopment”, http://www. Agilemodeling.com.org
    22. K. Mikkonen, “How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Live with the Uncertainties“, Internal Ericsson Documentation, Sweden 2011.
    23. D. Duka “Adoption of agile methodology in software develop-ment” in Information & Communication Technology Electronics & Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2013 36th Interna-tional Conference on May 2013, pp 426 – 430.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Naga malleswari, D., Pavan Kumar, M., sathvika, D., & Ajay Kumar, B. (2018). A Study on SDLC For Water Fall and Agile. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.32), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.32.13516