A survey on MANET protocols in wireless sensor networks

  • Authors

    • C Cynthia, Prudhvi Krishna Saguturu
    • Komali Bandi
    • Srikanth Magulluri
    • T Anusha
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.31.13384

    Received date: May 28, 2018

    Accepted date: May 28, 2018

    Published date: May 29, 2018

  • AODV (Ad Hoc on Demand Distance Vector), DSDV (Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), and TORA (Temporary Ordered Routing Algorithm), QoS (Quality of Service).

  • Abstract

    In Wireless sensor networks and ad hoc networks nodes have a freedom to move from one place to another, they are self-configuring this type of the structure fulfil the requirements of several application. A survey on the different MANET protocols will be done in this paper. Mainly this paper will focus on the Quality of Service on the different parameters like Throughput and Delay between different protocols like AODV (Ad Hoc on Demand Distance Vector), DSDV (Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), and TORA (Temporary Ordered Routing Algorithm). DSDV is called as proactive protocol because they know everything about the nodes in the network before the communication start. DSR, AODV, TORA protocols are called reactive protocol because nodes in this network do not know anything about network. They are also called ON-DEMAND routing protocols. After this analysis you will come to know which MANET protocol is best for different application.

  • References

    1. Ensor I, “Wireless Sensor Networks”, Commun. ACM, Vol.47, (2004), pp.53–57.
    2. Mbarushimana C & Shahrabi A, “Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, 21 st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshop (AINA W'07), (2007).
    3. Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu YC & Jetcheva J, “A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols”, Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking,(1998), pp.85-97.
    4. Johnson DB & Maltz DA, “Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks”, Mobile computing, Springer, (1996), pp.153–181.
    5. Perkins CE & Royer EM, “Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing”, Proceedings Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, (1999), pp.90–100.
    6. Abuhmida M, Radhakrishnan K & Wells I, “Performance Evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc Routing Protocols on Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring”, 17th UKSim-AMSS International Conference on Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), (2015), pp.544-548.
    7. Di Caro GA, Ducatelle F & Gambardella LM, “Studies of routing performance in a city-like testbed for mobile ad hoc networks”, Technical Report07-06, IDSIA, Lugano, Switzerland, (2006).
    8. Boukerche A, “Performance evaluation of routing protocols for ad hoc wireless networks”, Mob. Networks Appl., Vol.9, No.4, (2004), pp.333–342.
    9. Kassim M, Rahman RA & Mustapha R, “Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) routing protocols comparison for wireless sensor network”, IEEE International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), (2011), pp.148-152.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Cynthia, Prudhvi Krishna Saguturu, C., Bandi, K., Magulluri, S., & Anusha, T. (2018). A survey on MANET protocols in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.31), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.31.13384