Sub graph sampling and case citation network: a case study
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11820
Received date: April 21, 2018
Accepted date: April 30, 2026
Published date: July 4, 2018
-
Legal Sector, Network Analysis, Analytics in Legal Domain, Subgraph Sampling, Case-Citation Network. -
Abstract
Graphs or networks very commonly are used to represent connected or linked data. With the penetration of www in every sphere of life networked relationships can be easily established through communication links over web and network and graph analysis come as obvious choices of data representation and analysis. There are processes which can be analysed as network not through web but through the knowledge links available in these domains. In both these cases network analysis is challenged by the enormous size of the network in terms of nodes and links. Sub graph sampling can effectively be employed on large network structures to reduce the size of data while preserving the original properties of the network. Through this paper authors present a case study on application of sub graph sampling approach to obtain reduced case citation network in legal domain.
-
References
- Ana Paula Appel, Luis G. Moyano, “Link and Graph Mining in the Big Data Era”, Springe, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49340-4_17.
- Michele Berlingerio, Michele Coscia, FoscaGiannotti, Anna Monrea-le, Dino Pedreschi “Multidimensional networks: foundations of struc-tural analysis”, Springer, 2011.
- Rohit kumar Kaliyar, “Graph Databases”, ICCCA, 2015.
- Robert Bredereck, Christian Komusiewicz, Stefan Kratsch, Hen-drikMolter, Rolf Niedermeier and Manuel Sorge, “Assessing the Computational Complexity of Multi-Layer Subgraph Detection”, Springer, 2016.
- Daniel Stutzbach, Reza Rejaie, Nick Duffield, Subhabrata Sen, Wal-ter Willinger, “Sampling Techniques for Large, Dynamic Graphs”, IEEE, 2007.
- Rupali Sunil Wagh, “Application of Citation Network Analysis for Improved Similarity Index Estimation on Legal Case Documents: A study”, ICCTAC, 2017.
- Ben Shneiderman, AleksAris, “Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates”, IEEE, 2006.
- John Stasko, CarstenGörg, Zhicheng Liu, “Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization”, IEEE, 2008.
- MariosKoniaris, LoannisAnagnostopoulos, YannisVassiliou, “Net-work Analysis in the Legal Domain: A complex model for European Union legal sources”, Journal of Computer Networks, 2015.
- Dan Steiner, “Data Analytics and Your Law Firm, Law Technology Today”, Law and Innovation Conference, 2016.
- Owen Byrd, Legal, “Analytics vs. Legal Research: What’s the Dif-ference? Law Technology Today”, Law and Innovation Conference, 2017.
- Andrew Stranieri, John Zeleznikow, “Tools for Intelligent Decision Support System Development in the legal domain”, IEEE, 2000.
- Karl Branting, “Data-centric and logic-based models for automated legal problem solving”, Springer, 2017.
- Sushanta Kumar, P. Krishna Reddy, V. BalakistaReddy, Malti Suri2, “Finding Similar Legal Judgements Under Common Law System”, Springer, 2013.
- Pak Chung Wong, Chaomei Chen, CarstenGörg, Ben Shneiderman, John Stasko, Jim Thomas, “Graph Analytics—Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead”, IEEE, 2012.
- AkshayMinocha, Navjyoti Singh, ArjitSrivastava, “Finding relevant Indian judgemegnts using Dispersion of Citation Network”, ACM, 2015.
- GáborHamp, RékaMarkovich, “Automated Reference Extraction in Hungarian Legislative Texts and Visualization of their Inner Link Structures”, Openlaws Open Data Workshop, NAIL, 2015.
- Nidha Khanam, Rupali Sunil Wagh, “Application of Network Anal-ysis for Finding Relatedness among Legal Documents by Using Case Citation Data”, Journal on Information Technology, UGC, 2017.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Khanam, N., & Sunil Wagh, R. (2018). Sub graph sampling and case citation network: a case study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3), 1286-1289. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11820
