Comparative analysis of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence for OECD selected countries

  • Authors

    • Samia Gmidene economics
    • saida zaidi economics
    • Sonia Zouari Ghorbel economics
    2016-08-10
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.v4i2.6378
  • Renewable Energy, Nuclear Energy, Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions, Granger Causality Test.

  • The main purpose of this study is to investigate the causal relationship among renewable energy, nuclear energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions for selected OECD countries over the period 1980 to 2013. All variables are found to be cointgrated.

    Results of Granger causality show long-run relationship from GDP, renewable energy consumption and nuclear energy consumption to CO2 emissions, from CO2 emissions, GDP, to renewable energy consumption, from emissions, GDP to renewable energy, and from CO2 emissions GDP and nuclear energy consumption.

    In short run, results show that there exists bidirectional causality between GDP and CO2 emissions, and unidirectional causality running from renewable energy consumption to GDP. Also unidirectional causality running from renewable energy consumption to CO2 emissions without feedback but no causality running from nuclear energy consumption to CO2 emissions was found. This evidence suggests that renewable energy can help to mitigate CO2 emissions, but so far, nuclear energy consumption has not reached a level where it can CO2 emissions.

  • References

    1. [1] Mahadevan, R., AsafuAdjaye, J., (2007). Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 35(4), 2481-2490 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.019.

      [2] Oh, W., Lee, K., 2004. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 19701999. Energy Economics 26(1), 51-59 pp.

      [3] Masih, A.M.M., Masih, R., 1996. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multicountry study based on cointegration and errorcorrection modellingtechniques. Energy Economics 18(3), 165–183 pp.

      [4] Masih, A.M.M., Masih, R., 1997. On temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income, and prices: some new evidence from Asianenergy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration/vector error correction approach. Journal of Policy Modeling 19(4), 417-440 pp.

      [5] Masih, A.M.M., Masih, R., 1998. A multivariate cointegrated modeling approach in testing temporal causality between energy consumption, real income, and prices with an application to two Asian LDCs. Applied Economics 30(10), 1287–1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000368498324904.

      [6] Glasure, Y.U., Lee, A.R., 1996. The macroeconomic effects of relative prices, money, and federal spending on the relationship between US energy consumption and employment. Journal of Energy and Development 22(1), 81–91.

      [7] Yang, H.Y., 2000.A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energy Economics 22(3), 309–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00044-4.

      [8] Paul, S., Bhattacharya, R.N., 2004. Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: a note on conflicting results. Energy Economics 26(6), 977–983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.07.002.

      [9] Shiu, A., Lam, P.L., (2004), “Electricity consumption and economic growth in Chinaâ€, Energy Policy 32(1), 47–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00250-1.

      [10] Bozoklu S, Yilanci V. Energy consumption and economic growth for selected OECD countries: further evidence from the Granger causality test in the frequency domain. Energy Policy 2013; 63:877e81.

      [11] BashiriBehmiri N, PiresManso JR. How crude oil consumption impacts on economic growth of Sub-Saharan Africa? Energy 2013; 54:74e83.

      [12] Ang, J. B., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France.Energy Policy, 35, 4772-4778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.032.

      [13] Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., Mohd, S., 2012. Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Policy 51, 184–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065.

      [14] Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol. Econ. 49, 431–455. Fodha, M., Zaghdoud, O., 2010. Economic growth and environmental degradation in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 38, 1150–1156.

      [15] Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 3194. NBER, Cambridge.

      [16] Ozturk, I., Acaravci, A., 2010. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 3220–3225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005.

      [17] Payne, J. E. (2009) “On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US†Applied Energy 86, 575–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.003.

      [18] Chontanawat J, Lester C, Hunt Pierse R. Does energy consumption cause economic growth?: evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. J Policy Model 2008;30:209e20.

      [19] Levin, A., Lin, C.F., Chu, C-S.J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finitesample properties.Journal of Econometrics108, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7.

      [20] Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels.Journal of Econometrics115, 53–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.

      [21] Maddala, G.S., Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root rests with panel data and asimple new test.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics61, 631–652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13.

      [22] Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Baltagi, B.H. (Ed.), Elsevier,Amsterdam, pp. 161–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0731-9053(00)15006-6.

      [23] Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data.Econometrics Journal3, 148–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043.

      [24] Pedroni, P., 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14.

      [25] Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073.

      [26] PHILLIPS, P. C., HANSEN, B. E. 1990, Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 99–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297545.

      [27] STOCK, J. H., WATSON, M. W. A (1993), “Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systemsâ€, Econometrica, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 783–820. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2951763.

      [28] Masih, A.M.M., Masih, R., 1998. A multivariate cointegrated modeling approach in testing temporal causality between energy consumption, real income and prices with an application to two Asian LDCs. Applied Economics 30 (10), 1287–1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000368498324904.

      [29] Asafu-Adjaye, J., 2000. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics 22, 615–625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(00)00050-5.

      [30] Fatai, K., Oxley, L., Scrimgeour, F.G., 2004. Modelling the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in New Zealand, Australia, India, Indonesia, the Phillippines and Thailand. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 64, 431–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(03)00109-5.

      [31] Oh, W., Lee, K., 2004. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970– 1999. Energy Economics 26, 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(03)00030-6.

      [32] R. Morimoto, C. Hope The impact of electricity supply on economic growth in Sri Lanka, Energy Econ, 26 (2004), 77–85 pp.

      [33] C.C. Lee, C.P. Chang (2007), “The impact of energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from linear and nonlinear models in Taiwanâ€, Energy 32, pp. 2282–2294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.017.

      [34] H. Bloch, S. Rafiq, R. Salim, 2012), Coal consumption. CO2 emission and economic growth in China: empirical evidence and policy responses, Energy Econ, pp. 518–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.014.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Gmidene, S., zaidi, saida, & Zouari Ghorbel, S. (2016). Comparative analysis of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence for OECD selected countries. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 4(2), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.v4i2.6378