Determinants of AI Adoption Intention in Credit Risk Management: Evidence from Moroccan Banks

  • Authors

    https://doi.org/10.14419/5ks3zg51

    Received date: January 24, 2026

    Accepted date: February 20, 2026

    Published date: March 5, 2026

  • Artificial Intelligence; Behavioural Intention; Credit Risk Management; Regulatory Ambiguity; ‎Technology Acceptance Model
  • Abstract

    This research examines the behavioural intention of Moroccan banking professionals to ‎integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into credit risk management. Utilizing an expanded ‎Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the study integrates five principal constructs: perceived ‎usefulness, ease of use, explainability, trust, and regulatory ambiguity. Data were collected ‎from 131 credit risk professionals and examined by Partial Least Squares Structural Equation ‎Modeling (PLS-SEM). The model explains 62.7% of the variance in behavioural intention. The ‎results show that perceived usefulness is the most important factor in adoption, while ‎explainability, trust, and ease of use were not statistically significant. Regulatory ambiguity ‎showed a significant positive effect on behavioural intention, highlighting the importance of the ‎regulatory environment in shaping AI adoption decisions. These findings indicate that in the ‎Moroccan banking sector, performance value and legal frameworks are prioritized over usability ‎or transparency. The study provides actionable insights for policymakers and financial ‎organizations aiming to facilitate AI integration in environments sensitive to compliance‎.

  • References

    1. Cho JH, Chang SA, Kwon HS, Choi YH, KoSH, Moon SD, Yoo SJ, Song KH, Son HS, Kim HS, Lee WC, Cha BY, Son HY & Yoon KH (2006), Long-term effect of the internet-based glucose monitoring system on HbA1c Reduction and glucose stability: a 30-month follow-up study for diabetes management with a ubiquitous medical care system. Diabetes Care 29, 2625–2631.
    2. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL & Hauser SL (2008), Principles of Harrison’s Internal Medicine, Vol. 9, 17thedn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp.2275–2304.
    3. Kim HS & Jeong HS (2007), A nurse short message service by cellular phone in type-2 diabetic patients for six months. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16, 1082–1087.
    4. Lee JR, Kim SA, Yoo JW & Kang YK (2007), The present status of diabetes education and the role recognition as a diabetes educator of nurses in korea. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 77, 199–204.
    5. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hohne SH, Hu TM, Levine BA & Conlin PR (2005), Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care 28, 1624–1629.
    6. Thakurdesai PA, Kole PL & Pareek RP (2004), Evaluation of the quality and contents of diabetes mellitus patient education on Internet. Patient Education and Counseling 53, 309–313.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Jalila , B. ., & Abdellatif, M. . (2026). Determinants of AI Adoption Intention in Credit Risk Management: Evidence from Moroccan Banks. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 13(2), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.14419/5ks3zg51