The Impact of Financial Inclusion and Digitalizationon Income ‎Inequality: A Panel Data Analysisfor ASEAN

  • Authors

    • Abraham C. Camba Jr.‎ Department of Economics, College of Social Sciences and Development, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila
    https://doi.org/10.14419/vtfx2k20

    Received date: January 8, 2026

    Accepted date: February 25, 2026

    Published date: April 14, 2026

  • Financial Inclusion; Digitalization; Income Inequality; ASEAN; Panel Data

  • Abstract

    This study examines the impact of financial inclusion and digitalization on income inequality in selected ASEAN countries over the period ‎‎2011–2024 using panel data econometric techniques. Fixed Effects (FEM), Random Effects (REM), and Generalized Method of Moments ‎‎(GMM) estimators are employed to capture both static and dynamic relationships while accounting for unobserved heterogeneity and potential endogeneity. Correlation analysis indicates that financial inclusion and digitalization are moderately associated with lower income equality. FEM results show that financial inclusion significantly reduces inequality, whereas digitalization initially increases inequality, suggesting uneven distributional benefits during the early stages of digital adoption. These mixed results reflect transitional digital divide im-‎pacts in early digitalization phases, where access and digital capabilities remain uneven. In contrast, REM and GMM estimates reveal that ‎digitalization has a statistically significant inequality-reducing impact, highlighting its broader and dynamic role in expanding access to digital finance, employment opportunities, and entrepreneurial activity. Financial inclusion remains statistically insignificant in these models, ‎indicating that its short-run distributional impact may be limited without inclusive outreach and effective utilization. Overall, the findings ‎suggest that while digitalization contributes to inequality reduction over time, financial inclusion requires targeted and complementary poli‎cies to generate sustained distributive effects. The results provide relevant policy implications for promoting inclusive growth in ASEAN ‎economies‎.

  • References

    1. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Re-view of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.
    2. Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Wiley.
    3. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality, and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6.
    4. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
    5. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0.
    6. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.
    7. Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Financial inclusion and urban–rural income inequality: Long-run and short-run relationships. Emerging Markets Fi-nance and Trade, 56(2), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1562896.
    8. Isa, F. M., & Ali, R. (2019). Financial inclusion policies and rural income inequality in Malaysia. Asian Development Policy Review, 7(1), 1–15.
    9. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
    10. Lee, J. W., & Lee, S. M. (2022). Digital transformation and inequality in South Korea. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17(3), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12385.
    11. Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2020). Urban–rural digital divide and income inequality in China. China Economic Review, 62, 101120.
    12. McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in economic development. Brookings Institution.
    13. Ozili, P. K. (2022). Digital financial inclusion. In K. Sood, R. K. Dhanaraj, B. Balusamy, S. Grima, & R. U. Maheshwari (Eds.), Big data: A game changer for the insurance industry (pp. xx–xx). Emerald Publishing Limited.
    14. Ramos, G. D., Uy, C. M., & Tan, J. L. (2021). Digital finance and rural entrepreneurship in the Philippines. Journal of Development Policy, 15(2), 143–158.
    15. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
    16. Shaw, E. S. (1973). Financial deepening in economic development. Oxford University Press.
    17. Shirakawa, M. (2012). Financial inclusion and inequality: Lessons from Japan. Bank of Japan Economic Review, 45(4), 25–41.
    18. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. W. W. Norton & Company.
    19. Sun, Y., Chen, Z., & Wang, F. (2023). Digital financial inclusion, entrepreneurial activity, and rural income inequality. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(2), 267–283.
    20. Tan, C. H., & Chan, W. Y. (2022). Digitalization and financial inclusion: Evidence from Malaysia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 39(2), 178–192.
    21. Uy, C. M. (2022). Mobile banking and income inequality in the Philippines. Asian Banking Review, 10(3), 50–68.
    22. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Camba Jr.‎ , A. C. . (2026). The Impact of Financial Inclusion and Digitalizationon Income ‎Inequality: A Panel Data Analysisfor ASEAN. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 13(2), 604-612. https://doi.org/10.14419/vtfx2k20