From Presentation to Purchase: Economic and Financial Analysis of Host ‎Characteristics in Food Live-Streaming

  • Authors

    • Wei Zhao Panyapiwat Institute of Management
    • Yue He Panyapiwat Institute of Management
    • Quanbo Wang Panyapiwat Institute of Management
    https://doi.org/10.14419/443cc317

    Received date: October 28, 2025

    Accepted date: November 17, 2025

    Published date: November 24, 2025

  • Consumer Behavior; Economic Analysis; Host Characteristics; Live-Streaming Commerce; ‎Parasocial Interaction

  • Abstract

    This study examines the economic and financial implications of host characteristics in food ‎live-streaming commerce, a rapidly growing sector that has transformed digital retail. ‎Drawing on parasocial interaction theory and the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework, we investigate how streamer attributes—namely, professionalism, attractiveness, interactivity, and expertise—impact consumer trust and purchase intentions. Using secondary data from 345 consumers engaged in food live-streaming platforms, we employ structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the complex relationships between host characteristics and economic outcomes. ‎Results indicate that streamer professionalism (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and attractiveness (β = ‎‎0.38, p < 0.001) significantly enhance consumer trust, which mediates purchase intention (β = ‎‎0.51, p < 0.001). The economic analysis reveals that a one-standard-deviation increase in host ‎professionalism correlates with a 23% increase in consumer purchase value. Our findings ‎demonstrate that parasocial interaction plays a crucial mediating role (indirect effect = 0.31, p ‎‎< 0.001) between host characteristics and financial outcomes. The fsQCA results identify ‎three configurations of host attributes that lead to high purchase intentions, with ‎comprehensive trait combinations proving most effective. This research contributes to the ‎literature by integrating economic analysis with consumer psychology, providing actionable ‎insights for platform operators and content creators in the $843.93 billion global live-streaming commerce market. The study has significant implications for resource allocation, ‎streamer selection, and marketing strategy optimization in the food live-streaming sector‎.

  • References

    1. Electroiq. (2025). The live commerce market size worth $3.7 trillion by 2030. Retrieved from https://www.electroiq.com/live-commerce-market-size
    2. Fu, Y., & Hsu, C. (2023). Streamer characteristics and consumer engagement in live streaming commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Ap-plications, 58, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101247.
    3. Gao, W., Jiang, N., & Guo, Q. (2025). How cool virtual streamer influences customer in live-streaming commerce? Journal of Retailing and Con-sumer Services, 82, 104139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104139.
    4. Grand View Research. (2024). Live commerce platforms market size, share & trends analysis report. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com.
    5. Guo, Y., Zhang, K., & Wang, C. (2022). Way to success: Understanding top streamer's popularity and influence from the perspective of source characteristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102786.
    6. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
    7. Han, F., & Tepsan, W. (2025). The impact of streamer social presence and professionalism on food live streaming purchase intention: A model of moderated mediation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 37(6), 1423-1442. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2025-0151.
    8. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049.
    9. Hossain, M. A., Kalam, A., Nuruzzaman, M., & Kim, M. (2023). The power of live-streaming in consumers' purchasing decision. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231197903. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231197903.
    10. Huang, Y., & Mohamad, S. H. (2025). Examining the impact of parasocial interaction and social presence on impulsive purchase in live streaming commerce context. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1554681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1554681.
    11. Kang, J. W., & Namkung, Y. (2019). The information quality and source credibility matter in customers' evaluation toward food O2O commerce. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.011.
    12. Kang, K., Lu, J., Guo, L., & Li, W. (2020). The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102251.
    13. Kim, S., & Park, H. (2024). Cultural dimensions and trust in global live-streaming commerce: Evidence from East and West. Journal of Internation-al Marketing, 32(2), 155–173.
    14. Li, Y., Chen, X., & Zhang, M. (2023). Parasocial interaction and impulse buying in live streaming commerce. Psychology & Marketing, 40(7), 1432-1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21825.
    15. Li, Y., Wang, J., & Liu, H. (2024). The influence of anchor characteristics on consumer purchase intention: A case study of agricultural livestream-ing. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1534691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1534691.
    16. Liao, C., Luo, J., Wang, S., Shen, Y., & Lin, S. (2025). How live-streaming commerce influences consumers' impulse buying of near expiry-date food: Implications for reducing food waste. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1570483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1570483.
    17. Liao, J., Chen, K., Qi, J., Li, J., & Yu, I. Y. (2023). Creating immersive and parasocial live shopping experience for viewers: The role of streamers' interactional communication style. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(1), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2021-0114.
    18. Liu, X., Wang, D., Gu, M., & Yang, J. (2022). Research on the influence mechanism of anchors' professionalism on consumers' impulse buying in-tention in the livestream shopping scenario. Enterprise Information Systems, 17(6), 2147853. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2022.2065457.
    19. Luo, X., Cheah, J. H., Lim, X. J., Ramayah, T., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Inducing shoppers' impulsive buying tendency in live-streaming: Integrat-ing signaling theory with social exchange theory. Internet Research, 35(1), 157-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-04-2023-0260.
    20. Mai, T. D. P., To, A. T., Trinh, T. H. M., Nguyen, T. T., & Le, T. T. T. (2023). Para-social interaction and trust in live-streaming sellers. Emerging Science Journal, 7(3), 744-754. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-06.
    21. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
    22. Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U., & Fan, M. (2021). How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of S-O-R theory. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(4), 300-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-02-2021-0012.
    23. Shi, R., Wang, M., Qiao, T., & Shang, J. (2024). The effects of live streamer's facial attractiveness and product type on consumer purchase intention: An exploratory study with eye tracking technology. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050375.
    24. Soares, R. R., Zhang, T. C., Proença, J. F., & Kandampully, J. (2024). The role of influencer credibility in social media-based travel recommenda-tions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(3), 567-589.
    25. Statista. (2024). Livestream e-commerce sales in the United States from 2020 to 2026. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com.
    26. Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance per-spective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 100886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886.
    27. Tang, X., Hao, Z., & Li, X. (2024). The influence of streamers' physical attractiveness on consumer response behavior: Based on eye-tracking exper-iments. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1297369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297369.
    28. Tian, B., Chen, J., Zhang, J., Wang, W., & Zhang, L. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of streamer trust in livestreaming commerce. Behav-ioral Sciences, 13(10), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100812.
    29. Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117, 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032.
    30. Xu, X., Wu, J. H., & Li, Q. (2020). What drives consumer shopping behavior in live streaming commerce? Journal of Electronic Commerce Re-search, 21(3), 144-167.
    31. Yuan, S., Liu, L., Su, B., & Zhang, H. (2025). Streamer characteristics and consumer value co-creation in agricultural livestreaming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1628385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1628385.
    32. Zhao, D., Yang, J., & Zhao, C. (2024). Exploring how the live streaming context influences consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103734.
    33. Zhang, L., & Xu, H. (2025). AI-driven personalization in live-streaming: Opportunities and ethical challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 151, 107259.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Zhao, W., He, Y. ., & Wang, Q. (2025). From Presentation to Purchase: Economic and Financial Analysis of Host ‎Characteristics in Food Live-Streaming. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(7), 663-675. https://doi.org/10.14419/443cc317