Government Policies and Silk Handloom: ABibliometric ‎Study

  • Authors

    • Renuka Devi V. Ph.D. Full-Time Research Scholar, Department of Commerce. School of Social Sciences and Languages (SSL), Vellore Institute of ‎Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, 632 014‎
    • Dr. V. Selvam Professor, Department of Commerce, School of Social Sciences and Languages (SSL), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, ‎Tamil Nadu, India, 632 014
    https://doi.org/10.14419/9ah2j196

    Received date: October 14, 2025

    Accepted date: November 18, 2025

    Published date: December 14, 2025

  • Silk Handloom Weaving; Geographical Indication Perception; Financial Aid Schemes; Handloom Industry

  • Abstract

    Silk handloom weaving is an integral part of India's cultural and economic landscape, deeply embedded in its artisanal heritage. Government ‎policies have played a crucial role in shaping the sector’s trajectory, particularly through initiatives such as Geographical Indication (GI) tags ‎and financial aid schemes. This study employs a bibliometric approach to systematically analyze the impact of these policies on the silk ‎handloom industry, synthesizing findings from a dataset spanning 2000 to 2024, sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ‎and the Science Citation Index (SCI). Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) ‎guidelines, this study conducted a rigorous screening process, starting with 2,035 initial records. After duplicate removal and application of ‎inclusion-exclusion criteria, 178articles were deemed relevant for detailed bibliometric analysis.  The findings reveal a growing scholarly ‎interest in government interventions in the silk handloom sector, with a notable emphasis on the role of GI certification in enhancing product ‎authenticity, marketability, and economic benefits for weavers. This study underscores the importance of targeted policy reforms and greater ‎collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to optimize the benefits of government interventions. ‎Furthermore, it identifies critical research gaps, particularly in assessing the long-term socio-economic impact of GI certification and ‎financial support programs on weaver communities. By bridging these gaps, future research can contribute to a more sustainable and ‎resilient silk handloom ecosystem, ensuring that traditional artisans reap the full benefits of policy-driven advancements.

  • References

    1. Ahmed P, Sheereen Z, Rahman A. Problems Faced by the Silk Handloom Weavers in Azamgarh and Varanasi Districts of Uttar Pradesh. Interna-tional Journal of Convergent Research. 2024 Dec 19;1(1).
    2. Priyanka U, Vimala V. Impact of National Handloom Development Programme (NHDP)–Adoration to GI Tagged Kuthampully Sarees.
    3. Khatoon S, Iffat A. AatmaNirbhar Bharat Abhiyan: a tool to revive Uttar Pradesh handloom sector. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel. 2022 Nov 28;26(4):468-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-05-2021-0061.
    4. Padmaja VV, Thanigaiyarasu R. Problems and Prospects of Silk Weavers with Emerging Technology-in Reference to Kancheepuram Town of Ta-milnadu.
    5. Öztürk O, Kocaman R, Kanbach DK. How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal. Review of managerial science. 2024 Mar 6:1-29.
    6. Singh VK, Singh P, Karmakar M, Leta J, Mayr P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scien-tometrics. 2021 Jun;126:5113-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
    7. Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, Delgado-López-Cózar E. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: Which is best for me?. Im-pact of Social Sciences Blog. 2019 Dec 3.
    8. Kleminski R, Kazienko P, Kajdanowicz T. Analysis of direct citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling in scientific topic identification. Jour-nal of Information Science. 2022 Jun;48(3):349-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520962775.
    9. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021 Sep 1;133:285-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
    10. Chaudhary M, Agarwal B, Bhatia M. Geographical indications in India: A case of Handicraft industry in Uttar Pradesh. The Journal of World In-tellectual Property. 2022 Nov;25(3):617-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12244.
    11. Mukunda BG, Sahoo SS, Mohanta G, Mathew R. Tourist's Perception of Handicraft Tourism Development: A Study on Channapattana Toy Town in Karnataka. InEmerging Trends and Innovations in Industries of the Developing World 2023 Sep 28 (pp. 47-52). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003457602-9.
    12. Reddy, D. Narasimha. (2008). "Handloom Industry in India: Issues and Challenges."
    13. Varghese, T., and Salim, A. (2015). "Handloom Industry in Kerala: A Study of the Problems and Challenges."
    14. Narzary, P. (2013). "A Study on the Challenges Faced by the Handloom Industry in BTAD, Assam."
    15. Goswami, R., and Jain, R. K. (2014). "Strategy for Sustainable Development of Handloom Industry."
    16. Basu, S. (2016). "Textile, Garment, and Fashion Industry in Odisha: Prospects and Challenges."
    17. Chary, M. N., and Usha, K. (2021). "Socio-Economic Conditions of Handloom Weavers in Andhra Pradesh."
    18. Das, K. (2021). "Impact of Government Policies on Handloom Weavers in Assam."
    19. Malarkodi, K., (2020). "Challenges Faced by Handloom Weavers in Tamil Nadu."
    20. Srinivasulu, K. (1996). "Impact of 1985 Textile Policy on Handloom Sector."
    21. Kethan M, Khizerulla M, Sekhar SC, Basha M. A study on issues and challenges on production of handloom sector with special reference to rayalaseema and costal region of Andhra Pradesh. IJAR. 2022;8(6):89-95. https://doi.org/10.22271/allresearch.2022.v8.i6b.9823.
    22. Paul A. Analysis of handloom industry and its major problems in Dakshin Dinajpur of West Bengal. International Journal of Research and Analyti-cal Reviews. 2019;6(1):779-88.
    23. Basu B. Scope and Opportunities of Textile and Garment Development in Odisha. BTRA Scan. 2021 Jul 1;50(3).
    24. Divya CV, Gopika CV, Krishna MB. Financial Problems Faced by Handloom Weavers in Chendamangalam Cooperative Society. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 2020;8(5):226-30. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E6721.018520.
    25. Saikia D, Baruah H. Traditional Handloom and its Impact on Weavers: A Study in Assam. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 2021 May 1;12(4).
    26. Rathinamoorthy R, Prathiba Devi R. Societal Sustainability of Handloom Sector in Tamil Nadu—A Case Study. Handloom Sustainability and Cul-ture: Artisanship and Value Addition. 2021:161-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5272-1_7.
    27. Niranjana S. Appraising the Indian handloom industry. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001 Nov 10:4248-50.
    28. Mishra SS, Mohapatra AD. Sustainability of handloom: a review. Ilkogr. Online Elem. Educ. Online. 2020;19:1923-40.
    29. Khan M. Socio-Economic condition of Handloom weavers-A case study of ChiralaMandal, Andhra Pradesh. IOSR Journal of Economics and Fi-nance (IOSR-JEF), e-ISSN. 2020:2321-5933.
    30. Dutta, M., and Deb, P. (2023). "Statutory and Policy Roadmap for Gamosa through Innovation System Lens." SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4544944.
    31. Wu Z, Zhou L, Ding X, Wu X, Wang L. Knowledge roadmap of sustainable development in the textile and apparel industry: a scientometric analy-sis. Fashion and Textiles. 2022 Oct 25;9(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-022-00308-6.
    32. Sarker MS, Bartok I. Global trends of green manufacturing research in the textile industry using bibliometric analysis. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering. 2024 Jun 1;9:100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100578.
    33. Niranjana S, Vinayan S. Growth and prospects of the handloom industry. Planning Commission, Government of India (GOI), New Delhi. 2001.
    34. Husain MD, Farooq S, Siddiqui MO, Khan DR. Textile dynamics in Pakistan: Unraveling the threads of production, consumption, and global com-petitiveness. InConsumption and Production in the Textile and Garment Industry: A Comparative Study Among Asian Countries 2024 Sep 1 (pp. 33-58). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6577-5_3.
    35. Ahmed P, Sheereen Z. A Study of Socio-Economic Conditions of Handloom Weavers in Uttar Pradesh of India. Saudi J Econ Fin. 2022;6(10):339-50. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjef.2022.v06i10.002.
    36. Singha R, Singha S. Women’s Empowerment through the Silk Industry of Assam, India, and its underlying Economy. Journal of International Women's Studies. 2020;21(5):9-31.
    37. Malarkodi M, Indumathi VM, Deepa N, Divya K. Analyzing constraints of handloom weavers in the western zone of Tamil Nadu using rank-based quotient technique. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 2020;10(3and4):79-82. https://doi.org/10.5958/2250-0499.2020.00056.7.
    38. Ramana JV, Reddy DH, Kumar V, Sirisha K. An empirical study on marketing of handloom fabrics in Andhra Pradesh (A case study with refer-ence to Guntur district). International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 2019;8(8):1071-5.
    39. Zhang S, Wang X, Xu J, Chen Q, Peng M, Hao J. Green manufacturing for achieving carbon neutrality goal requires innovative technologies: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2022. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2024 Jun 1;140:255-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.08.016.
    40. Punj N, Ahmi A, Tanwar A, Rahim SA. Mapping the field of green manufacturing: A bibliometric review of the literature and research frontiers. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023 Oct 15;423:138729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138729.
    41. Dutta M, Borah MP, Kalita A, Bhuyan A, Goswami M. Cross Sectional Analysis of Domestic Weavers of Assam. Available at SSRN 4432544. 2022 Sep 30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4432544.
    42. Chinnu DC, Sheeba P. The Socio-Economic Conditions of Handloom Weavers in Vellore District of Tamil Nadu. Available at SSRN 3818666. 2021 Apr 3. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3816666.
    43. Li, C., Ban, Q., Ge, L., Qi, L., & Fan, C. (2024). The relationship between geographical indication products and farmers’ incomes based on meta-analysis. Agriculture, 14(6), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060798.
    44. Li, C., Gao, J., Ge, L., Hu, W., & Ban, Q. (2023). Do geographical indication products promote the growth of the agricultural economy? An empir-ical study based on meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15(19), 14428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914428.
    45. Li, C., Ban, Q., Gao, J., Ge, L., & Xu, R. (2024). The Role of Geographical Indication Products in Promoting Agricultural Development—A Meta-Analysis Based on Global Data. Agriculture; Basel, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101831.
    46. Deselnicu, O. C., Costanigro, M., Souza-Monteiro, D. M., & McFadden, D. T. (2023). A meta-analysis of geographical indication food valuation studies: what drives the premium for origin-based labels?. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 204-219.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    V. , R. D. ., & Selvam , D. V. . (2025). Government Policies and Silk Handloom: ABibliometric ‎Study. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(8), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.14419/9ah2j196