Leveraging Commitment and Technology Investment for Performance: The Contingent Role of Digital Ambidexterity

  • Authors

    https://doi.org/10.14419/j0yy3w86

    Received date: September 28, 2025

    Accepted date: November 16, 2025

    Published date: December 23, 2025

  • Digital ambidextrous capability, technology investment, top management commitment, technology turbulence, digital performance
  • Abstract

    This research examines how digital ambidextrous capability serves as a critical transformation mechanism connecting technology investment and management commitment to digital performance outcomes within logistics SMEs operating across Sumatra, Indonesia, particularly under varying degrees of technology turbulence. Drawing on data from project managers in logistics SMEs through PLS-SEM methodology, the analysis uncovers compelling evidence that both technology investment and top management commitment achieve their performance impacts exclusively through the development of digital ambidextrous capability, rather than operating through direct channels. This complete mediation pattern fundamentally challenges conventional resource-based perspectives that assume straightforward linkages between organizational inputs and performance outputs. Furthermore, technology turbulence emerges as a consequential boundary condition that progressively amplifies the strength of relationships between ambidextrous capability and performance outcomes as environmental volatility intensifies. The analytical framework demonstrates strong predictive validity, extending beyond retrospective explanation to offer forward-looking forecasting capacity. This investigation advances dynamic capabilities scholarship by positioning digital ambidextrous capability as an indispensable intermediary process that converts organizational investments into tangible Digital ambidextrous capability returns within emerging economy settings. While acknowledging inherent constraints of cross-sectional research designs, potential conceptual overlaps among related constructs, and reliance on single-respondent data sources, this work furnishes actionable insights for managers navigating digital transformation journeys, emphasizing capability cultivation as the pivotal lever for unlocking performance gains amid turbulent technological landscapes.

  • References

    1. . Abdelaziz, M. A. A., Wu, J., Yuan, C., & Ghonim, M. A. (2023). Unlocking supply chain product and process innovation through the development of supply chain learning capabilities under technological turbulence: Evidence from Egyptian SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Man-agement, 34(5), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2022-0395
    2. . Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, 77/78, 345–348.
    3. . Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2020). Foreign direct investment, information technology, and economic growth dynamics in Sub-Saharan Af-rica. Telecommunications Policy, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2019.101838
    4. . Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained Digital ambidextrous capability advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
    5. . Bourlakis, M., Nisar, T. M., & Prabhakar, G. (2023). How technostress may affect employee performance in educational work environments. Tech-nological Forecasting and Social Change, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122674
    6. . Buccieri, D., Javalgi, R. G., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidex-trous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities. International Business Review, 29(2).
    7. . Cangelosi, V. E., & Dill, W. R. (1965). Organizational Learning: Observations Toward a Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391412
    8. . Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capabil-ity, network capability, and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.03.035
    9. . Churchill, G. A., & Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110
    10. . Cristofaro, M., Helfat, C. E., & Teece, D. J. (2025). Adapting, Shaping, Evolving: Refocusing on the Dynamic Capabilities–Environment Nexus. Academy of Management Collections, 4(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMC.2022.0008
    11. . Dong, Y., Feng, T., & Sheng, H. (2024). Digital-based business model design and firm performance: the mediating role of ambidextrous innova-tion. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(11), 2309–2324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2023-0358
    12. . El Manzani, Y., El Idrissi, M., & Lissaneddine, Z. (2023). Soft quality management practices and product innovation ambidexterity: the mediating role of market orientation ambidexterity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(5), 1333–1364. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2021-0460
    13. . Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Digital ambidextrous capability Advantage and Firm's Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620–644. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-020-00655-z
    14. . Foisal, M. T. M., Abedin, M. T., & Ali, E. (2025). Investment in digital technology and entrepreneurial trajectory: Is there any Digital ambidextrous capability edge? Asian Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-12-2023-0423
    15. . Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132
    16. . Hambrick, D. (1982). Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 159–174.
    17. . He, P., Pei, Y., Lin, C., & Ye, D. (2021). Ambidextrous marketing capabilities, exploratory and exploitative market‐based innovation, and innova-tion performance: an empirical study on China's manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031146
    18. . Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
    19. . Jiang, S., Yang, J., Yu, M., Lin, H., Li, C., & Doty, H. (2022). Strategic conformity, organizational learning ambidexterity, and corporate innova-tion performance: An inverted U-shaped curve? Journal of Business Research, 149, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.05.023
    20. . Jing, H., Zhang, Y., & Ma, J. (2023). Influence of digital ambidextrous capabilities on SMEs' transformation performance: The mediating effect of business model innovation. Heliyon, 9(11), e21020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21020
    21. . Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Power Anomalies in Testing Mediation. Psychological Science, 25(2), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613502676
    22. . Keszey, T. (2020). Environmental orientation, sustainable behaviour at the firm-market interface and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118524
    23. . Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Wang, C. (2025). Digital platform capability and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of strategic flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2024.114971
    24. . Lisi, W., Zhu, R., & Yuan, C. (2020). Embracing green innovation via green supply chain learning: The moderating role of green technology turbu-lence. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.1979
    25. . Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001
    26. . Liu, Q. R., Liu, J. M., & He, Z. P. (2023). Digital transformation ambidexterity and business performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Man-agement, 36(5), 1402–1420. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2022-0280
    27. . López‐Gamero, M. D., Molina‐Azorín, J. F., Pereira‐Moliner, J., & Pertusa‐Ortega, E. M. (2023). Agility, innovation, environmental management and Digital ambidextrous capabilityness in the hotel industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2373
    28. . Ma, H., Jia, X., & Wang, X. (2022). Digital Transformation, Ambidextrous Innovation and Enterprise Value: Empirical Analysis Based on Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14159482
    29. . Maleshkov, V., Valchanov, H., & Aleksieva, V. (2024). Blockchain-Based Model for Warehouse Management Systems for Artworks and Collecti-bles. Engineering Proceedings, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024070039
    30. . Masrianto, A. (2024). How to Boost Your Firm's Digital Marketing Capability? International Journal of Technology. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i3.5691
    31. . Mu'min, H., Kaihatu, T. S., & Bernardus, D. (2025). Dynamic Capabilities, Technological Capability, and Green Innovation Performance in Indo-nesian Manufacturing Industries. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(5), 3803–3814. https://doi.org/10.37641/JIMKES.V13I5.3736
    32. . Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., Ukko, J., Rantala, T., & Rantanen, H. (2023). Shaping Digital Innovation Via Digital-related Capabilities. Information Sys-tems Frontiers, 25(3), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10796-020-10089-2
    33. . Oduro, S., De Nisco, A., & Mainolfi, G. (2023). Do digital technologies pay off? A meta-analytic review of the digital technologies/firm perfor-mance nexus. Technovation, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2023.102836
    34. . Oduro, S., & Haylemariam, L. G. (2025). Effect of social and environmental sustainability on SME Digital ambidextrous capabilityness: a meta-analytic review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11301-025-00519-3
    35. . Ouyang, H., Cui, X., Peng, X., & Udemba, E. N. (2023). Reverse knowledge transfer in digital era and its effect on ambidextrous innovation: A simulation based on system dynamics. Heliyon, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22717
    36. . Park, O., Bae, J., & Hong, W. (2019). High-commitment HRM system, HR capability, and ambidextrous technological innovation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(9), 1526–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1296880
    37. . Pradhana, G. G., Sembiring, M., Dewi, L., Kaihatu, T. S., & Mu'min, H. (2025). Social Innovation as A Transmission Mechanism: How Govern-ment Commitment Translates Into Socio-Economic Development In Emerging Markets. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Stud-ies, 12(4), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.14419/R235R455
    38. . Pramono, R., Kaihatu, T. S., Bernardus, D., Mu'Min, H., & Darmanto. (2025). Entrepreneurial Marketing and Business Performance in System In-tegrator Start-Ups: A Serial Mediation Analysis Through Technology Customization and Innovation Capability. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(6), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.14419/VSFS3065
    39. . Purnawan, M. P., Rachbini, W., Mu'min, H., & Darmanto. (2025). Digital Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Performance: The Mediat-ing Role of Digital Innovation Competence and The Moderating Effect of Digital Technology Preparedness. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.14419/N6Q13J78
    40. . Radiany, A. A., Radiany, A. A., Mu'min, H., Darma, Purnawan, M. P., & Biki, S. B. (2025). The Impact of Social Media on Organizational Innova-tion in Cultural Institutions: A Mediation Analysis of Visitor Co-Creation and Digital ambidextrous capability Performance. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.14419/gbzzek97
    41. . Sam, T. H., Mu'min, H., Kaihatu, T. S., Prihanisetyo, A., & Pramono, R. (2025). Dynamic Capabilities in Volatile Markets: Leveraging Strategic Flexibility and Customer Insights to Drive Product Innovation and Market Performance. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Stud-ies, 12(5), 1144–1163. https://doi.org/10.14419/6Z107704
    42. . Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2023). "PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet"–retrospective observations and recent advances. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 31(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488
    43. . Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Market Research, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
    44. . Shabbir, S., Danish, R. Q., Rehman, M., Hasnain, M., & Asad, H. (2021). An Empirical Investigation of Environmental Turbulence and Fear in Predicting Entrepreneurial Improvisation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020157
    45. . Sharma, P. N., Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Prediction-Oriented Model Selection in Partial Least Squares Path Model-ing. Decision Sciences, 52(3), 567–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/DECI.12329
    46. . Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233–253.
    47. . Teece, D. J. (2025). The multinational enterprise, capabilities, and digitalization: governance and growth with world disorder. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41267-024-00767-7
    48. . Trieu, H. D. X., Nguyen, P. Van, Nguyen, T. T. M., Vu, HaiT. M., & Tran, KhoaT. (2023). Information technology capabilities and organizational ambidexterity facilitating organizational resilience and firm performance of SMEs. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(4), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.03.004
    49. . Usman Shehzad, M., Zhang, J., Le, P. B., Jamil, K., & Cao, Z. (2023). Stimulating frugal innovation via information technology resources, knowledge sources and market turbulence: a mediation-moderation approach. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(4), 1071–1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2021-0382
    50. . Wijayanto, G., Mu'min, H., Waangsir, F. W., & Ardhiyansyah, A. (2024). The Effect of Environmental Education, Consumer Awareness, and En-vironmentally Friendly Practices on Plastic Waste Reduction in Indonesia. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(03), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i03.708
    51. . Yadav, S., Samadhiya, A., Kumar, A., Majumdar, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Luthra, S. (2023). Achieving the sustainable development goals through net zero emissions: Innovation-driven strategies for transitioning from incremental to radical lean, green and digital technologies. Re-sources, Conservation and Recycling, 197, 107094. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2023.107094
    52. . Yu, J., & Zhu, L. (2022). Corporate ambidexterity: Uncovering the antecedents of enduring sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, 365. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.132740
    53. . Zaman, S. A. A., Vilkas, M., Zaman, S. I., & Jamil, S. (2024). Digital technologies and digitalization performance: the mediating role of digitaliza-tion management. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2024-0176
    54. . Zhang, M., Chen, X., Xie, H., Esposito, L., Parziale, A., Taneja, S., & Siraj, A. (2024). Top of tide: Nexus between organization agility, digital ca-pability and top management support in SME digital transformation. Heliyon, 10(10), e31579. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E31579
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ferdy, Kaihatu, T. S., & Sutrisno, T. F. . (2025). Leveraging Commitment and Technology Investment for Performance: The Contingent Role of Digital Ambidexterity. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(8), 811-821. https://doi.org/10.14419/j0yy3w86