Evaluating The Operational Dynamics and Financial Accountability of Kerala’s Welfare Corporations in Promoting Socio-Economic Equity among ‎Marginalized Groups

  • Authors

    • Varghese K Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumaracoil, Tamil Nadu, India
    • M. Janarthanan Pillai Research Supervisor, Professor, Department of Management Studies, Rohini College of Engineering and Technology, Palkulam, ‎Kanyakumari District
    https://doi.org/10.14419/spz31265

    Received date: September 15, 2025

    Accepted date: October 25, 2025

    Published date: November 6, 2025

  • Factor Analysis; Marginalized Groups; Multivariate Analysis of Variance; Multiple Linear Regression; Socio-Economic Advancement; Welfare ‎Schemes.
  • Abstract

    Marginalized groups are communities that experience persistent social, economic, and political disadvantages, often resulting in limited ac‎cess to essential resources such as education, employment, healthcare, and financial stability. In Kerala, efforts to promote inclusive development have led to the implementation of a wide range of welfare schemes. Among these, three key public sector organizations—Kerala ‎State Women’s Development Corporation (KSWDC), Kerala State Handicapped Persons Welfare Corporation (KSHPWC), and Kerala ‎State Development Corporation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (KSDCSCST)—have been selected for this study based on ‎their targeted welfare initiatives aimed at empowering women, Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and persons with disabilities. ‎This research evaluates the impact of these welfare schemes on the socio-economic development of marginalized communities in Kerala ‎using a quantitative approach. Using Multiple Linear Regression (R² = 0.78) and MANOVA, the research finds statistically significant ‎improvements in financial independence (M = 3.8), job security (M = 3.5), educational attainment (M = 3.9), and quality of life (M = 4.0). ‎Factor analysis identifies strategic domains such as skill development, gender empowerment, and accessibility. These results demonstrate ‎that targeted welfare policies yield measurable and meaningful socio-economic advancements. The study underscores the need for accounta‎bility-driven, inclusive policymaking.

  • References

    1. Ali, S., & Shafeeq, N. Y. (2021). Women of marginalized communities in India and their access to education. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6, 1635-1640. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR21626155226.
    2. Allen, R., & Tommasi, D. (2001). Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transition Countries. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264192607-en.
    3. Allotey, E., García-Carrión, R., Villardón-Gallego, L., & Soler-Gallart, M. (2023). Transforming the educational experiences of marginalized stu-dents in Ghana through dialogic literary gatherings. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01801-z.
    4. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European law journal, 13(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
    5. Devi, S. K., & Dhal, N. (2020). Socio-economic Initiative of the Government and its efficacy on Tribal Women. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E5010.018520.
    6. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.
    7. Jose, S. B. L., & Prasad, A. K. (2024). Perceptions of Tribals on Their Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Welfare Aspects in Kerala.
    8. Kaplan, R. S. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Review Press.
    9. Kumar, M. L. (2023). Socio-Political, Economic, and Educational challenges for marginalized people in India. ldealistic Journal of Advanced Re-search in Progressive Spectrums (IJARPS) eISSN–2583-6986, 2(07), 12-16.
    10. Kumar, S., Sharma, M., & Chandel, S. SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SCHEMES IN THE TRIBAL AREAS OF HI-MACHAL PRADESH.
    11. Marson, F., Eagly, P., & Russell, O. M. (2023). Impact of Social Assistance Programs on Family Economic Welfare in Urban Environments: An Analysis of Equity and Community Engagement. Law and Economics, 17(3), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v17i3.44.
    12. Meng, X. (2024). Education policy and social justice: a policy framework analysis for improving educational opportunities for marginalized groups. Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies, 2, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.54254/3049-7248/2/2024008.
    13. Ochieng, V. O., & Waithanji Ngware, M. (2023). Adoption of education technologies for learning during COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of marginalized and vulnerable learner populations in Kenya. International journal of educational reform, 32(4), 464-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221076081.
    14. Preethi, V. P., Thorat, V. A., & Dhekale, J. S. (2022). Disparities in Socio-economic development in Kerala: A disaggregated analysis.
    15. Roshni, P. K. Marginalization, Globalization and Scheduled Tribes in Kerala.
    16. Shah, A. (Ed.). (2007). Performance accountability and combating corruption. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6941-8.
    17. Sharma, S., Mehra, D., Akhtar, F., & Mehra, S. (2020). Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC public health, 20, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09884-y.
    18. Swathy, P. S., & Venugopal, B. TRIBAL WELFARE SCHEMES IN KERALA: AN EVALUATION.
    19. Vermais, N. M. P., & Srivastava, A. (2021). The Routledge handbook of exclusion, inequality and stigma in India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295706.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    K, V., & Pillai , M. J. . (2025). Evaluating The Operational Dynamics and Financial Accountability of Kerala’s Welfare Corporations in Promoting Socio-Economic Equity among ‎Marginalized Groups. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(7), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.14419/spz31265