Overcoming Career Plateau: The Role of AI in Shaping ‎Women’s Career Paths in Finance

  • Authors

    • Metin Karademir Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Aksaray University, 68100 Aksaray, Turkiye
    https://doi.org/10.14419/q2scav20

    Received date: August 25, 2025

    Accepted date: September 1, 2025

    Published date: September 6, 2025

  • Artificial Intelligence; Human Resources Management; Career Plateau; Women in Finance; Gender

  • Abstract

    This study explores the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and career plateaus among women working in corporate finance roles ‎in Istanbul. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven professionals occupying junior, mid-level, and managerial positions. The ‎interviews focused on everyday applications of AI, including performance dashboards, promotion lists, learning recommendations, and ‎financial forecasting and reporting. Perceptions of both opportunities and challenges were examined, together with their influence on ‎feelings of career stagnation or progress. A reflexive thematic analysis was applied.‎

    The findings suggest that AI helps make employee contributions more visible and supports performance discussions with shared evidence. ‎Personalized learning recommendations were described as valuable, particularly for early-career employees seeking direction. However, ‎several difficulties emerged. Some aspects of work, such as coordination, mentoring, and handling crises, were often overlooked by AI ‎metrics. The constant presence of scoring mechanisms was reported to create pressure and anxiety. In addition, decision-making processes ‎sometimes slowed down when AI outputs were mediated by unclear committee structures.‎

    More positive results were observed when AI was used in an advisory role, supported by transparent human review and regular bias ‎checks. Career planning was more effective when personal circumstances such as mobility, language, and caregiving responsibilities were ‎recognized. Although based on a small and non-random sample, the study offers evidence from Istanbul and highlights pathways for ‎broader future research‎.

  • References

    1. Gao, K., & Zamanpour, A. (2024). How can AI-integrated applications affect the financial engineers’ psychological safety and work-life balance: Chinese and Iranian financial engineers and administrators’ perspectives. BMC psychology, 12(1), 555. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02041-9.
    2. Biliavska, V., Castanho, R. A., & Vulevic, A. (2022). Analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence in enhancing the human resource practices. J. Intell. Manag. Decis, 1(2), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd010206.
    3. Woźniak-Jęchorek, B., Rydzak, W., & Kuźmar, S. (2023). Decoding the interface: Exploring women's perspectives on integrating AI in profession-al work. Human Technology, 19(3), 325-351. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2023.19-3.2.
    4. Farivar, F., Anthony, M., Richardson, J., & Amarnani, R. (2024). More to life than promotion: Self‐initiated and self‐resigned career plat-eaus. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(4), 1022-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12542.
    5. Khan, S., & Sreenivasan, G. K. (2024). Impact of AI on Work Life Balance of Working Women in Hotel Industry. Indian Scientific Journal of Re-search in Engineering and Management, 9(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM38120.
    6. Wong, L. P. (2024). Artificial intelligence and job automation: challenges for secondary students’ career development and life plan-ning. Merits, 4(4), 370-399. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits4040027.
    7. Smith‐Ruig, T. (2009). Exploring career plateau as a Multi‐faceted phenomenon: Understanding the types of career plateaux experienced by ac-counting professionals. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 610-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00608.x.
    8. Ha, J. C., & Park, H. S. (2018). Effect of regional public corporation women employee's career plateau upon subjective career success. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(10), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no10.51.
    9. Lin, Y. C., & Chen, A. S. Y. (2021). Experiencing career plateau on a committed career journey: A boundary condition of career stages. Personnel Review, 50(9), 1797-1819. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2020-0192.
    10. Aarathy, T. S. (2025). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Work-Life Balance for Women Employees in the Academic Sector. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to AI, Data, and Innovation for a Smarter World (pp. 253-270). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9375-8.ch015.
    11. Dorta-González, P., López-Puig, A. J., Dorta-González, M. I., & González-Betancor, S. M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence usage by re-searchers at work: Effects of gender, career stage, type of workplace, and perceived barriers. Telematics and Informatics, 94, 102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102187.
    12. Chang, P. C., Geng, X., & Cai, Q. (2024). The impact of career plateaus on job performance: the roles of organizational justice and positive psycho-logical capital. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020144.
    13. Khan, M., Sulaiman, R., Nazir, O., Khan, S., & Awan, S. (2024). The unseen in the glass ceilings: examining women’s career advancement in higher education institutions through a multi-level institutional lens. Human Resource Development International, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2342762.
    14. Krstić, A., Shen, W., Varty, C. T., Lam, J. Y., & Hideg, I. (2025). Taking on the Invisible Third Shift: The Unequal Division of Cognitive Labor and Women’s Work Outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 49(2), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843251330284.
    15. Kumar, R., Akbar, W., & Khan, N. R. (2021). Moderating role of person job-fit facet between hierarchical plateau and turnover intention. South Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 15(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843251330284.
    16. Ahmad Saufi, R., Aidara, S., Che Nawi, N. B., Permarupan, P. Y., Zainol, N. R. B., & Kakar, A. S. (2023). Turnover intention and its antecedents: The mediating role of work–life balance and the moderating role of job opportunity. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1137945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1137945.
    17. Chaturvedi, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2025). Who gets the callback? generative ai and gender bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21400.
    18. Chen, Z. (2023). Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices. Humanities and social sciences communica-tions, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x.
    19. Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., ... & Biega, A. J. (2025). Fairness and bias in algorithmic hiring: A multidisciplinary survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 16(1), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696457.
    20. Mujtaba, D. F., & Mahapatra, N. R. (2024). Fairness in AI-driven recruitment: Challenges, metrics, methods, and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19699.
    21. An, J., Huang, D., Lin, C., & Tai, M. (2024). Measuring gender and racial biases in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15281.
    22. Russo, C., Romano, L., Clemente, D., Iacovone, L., Gladwin, T. E., & Panno, A. (2025). Gender differences in artificial intelligence: the role of artificial intelligence anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559457.
    23. Necula, S. C., Fotache, D., & Rieder, E. (2024). Assessing the impact of artificial intelligence tools on employee productivity: insights from a com-prehensive survey analysis. Electronics, 13(18), 3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183758.
    24. Liu, X., & Li, Y. (2025). Examining the double-edged sword effect of AI usage on work engagement: The moderating role of core task characteris-tics substitution. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020206.
    25. Brown, A. S., Dishop, C. R., Kuznetsov, A., Chao, P. Y., & Woolley, A. W. (2025). Beyond efficiency: Trust, AI, and surprise in knowledge work environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 167, 108605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108605.
    26. Yin, R. K. (2003), Applications of Case Study Research (2nd ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    27. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023). Generative AI at work. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31161.
    28. Hemmer, P., Westphal, M., Schemmer, M., Vetter, S., Vössing, M., & Satzger, G. (2023, March). Human-AI collaboration: the effect of AI delega-tion on human task performance and task satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 453-463). https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584052.
    29. Valtonen, A., Saunila, M., Ukko, J., Treves, L., & Ritala, P. (2025). AI and employee wellbeing in the workplace: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 199, 115584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115584.
    30. Reuters. (2024, March 21). AI can narrow justice gap, but women lawyers are slower to adopt it, Berkeley study shows. Reuters Legal News. Availa-ble online: https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/ai-can-narrow-justice-gap-women-lawyers-slower-adopt-it-berkeley-study-shows-2024-03-21, last visit: 31.08.2025
    31. Kadoma, K., Aubin Le Quere, M., Fu, X. J., Munsch, C., Metaxa, D., & Naaman, M. (2024, May). The role of inclusion, control, and ownership in workplace ai-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642650.
    32. Mäkelä, E., & Stephany, F. (2024). Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19754. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5153230.
    33. Dillon, E. W., Jaffe, S., Immorlica, N., & Stanton, C. T. (2025). Shifting work patterns with generative ai (No. w33795). National Bureau of Eco-nomic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33795.
    34. Otis, N. G., Delecourt, S., Cranney, K., & Koning, R. (2024). Global evidence on gender gaps and generative AI. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/h6a7c.
    35. Mirbabaie, M., Brünker, F., Möllmann Frick, N. R., & Stieglitz, S. (2022). The rise of artificial intelligence–understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace. Electronic Markets, 32(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00496-x.
    36. Heilman, M. E., Caleo, S., & Manzi, F. (2024). Women at work: Pathways from gender stereotypes to gender bias and discrimination. Annual Re-view of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 165-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-034105.
    37. Hoffman, M., & Stanton, C. T. (2024). People, practices, and productivity: A review of new advances in personnel economics. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w32849.
    38. Chuang, Y. T., Chiang, H. L., & Lin, A. P. (2025). Insights from the Job Demands–Resources Model: AI's dual impact on employees’ work and life well-being. International Journal of Information Management, 83, 102887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102887.
    39. Giuntella, O., Konig, J., & Stella, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the wellbeing of workers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 20087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98241-3.
    40. Sahni, S., Kaushal, L. A., & Gupta, P. (2025). Gendered differences and strategies for work-life balance: Systematic review based on social ecolog-ical framework perspective. Acta Psychologica, 256, 105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105019.
    41. ILO Report via Economic Times. (2025, May 29). AI poses a greater threat to women in the workforce, but why? The Economic Times. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/ai-poses-a-greater-threat-to-women-in-the-workforce-but-why-ilo-study-reveals-alarming-gender-gap-predictions/articleshow/121496170.cms?from=mdr, last visit: 31.08.2025.
    42. Kalim, U., Kanwar, A., Sha, J., & Huang, R. (2025). Barriers to AI adoption for women in higher education: a systematic review of the Asian con-text. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00390-5.
    43. Aldasoro, I., Armantier, O., Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., & Oliviero, T. (2024). Survey evidence on gen AI and households: job prospects amid trust concerns (No. 86). Bank for International Settlements.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Karademir, M. (2025). Overcoming Career Plateau: The Role of AI in Shaping ‎Women’s Career Paths in Finance. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.14419/q2scav20