Measuring The Influence of The Central Business DistrictDevelopment of SDGs on The Growth and Income of People ‎Affected by The Development of The New Nusantara Capital City

  • Authors

    • Sugeng Susanto Universitas Raharja
    • Al Amin Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia and Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
    • Hardiansyah Padli Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
    • Yefri Joni Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
    • Windy Dwi Zhelsa Fithri Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia and BAZNAS Kabupaten Mojokerto
    • Shinta Lintang Nurillah Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
    • Istiqom Shinta Hardiyanti Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
    • Heru Widoyo Binus University
    • Julia Adelina Department of Tourism, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
    • Irnayenti Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
    • Marwini Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
    https://doi.org/10.14419/q4d9fn39

    Received date: August 2, 2025

    Accepted date: August 9, 2025

    Published date: August 16, 2025

  • Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Economic Growth; Income; Central Business District
  • Abstract

    Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of implementing the Sustainable Development ‎Goals (SDGs) on community growth and Income using a quantitative approach. ‎

    Design/methodology/approach: This study employs SEM-PLS analysis using the WarpPLS ‎‎8.0 analysis tool, chosen due to its ability to analyze complex relationships between variables ‎through structural models. ‎

    Findings: The results of the analysis show that the SDGs have a positive and significant ‎influence on growth, with a regression coefficient (β) value of 0.90 and a p-value of 0.01, which ‎is smaller than the significance level of 0.05, indicating that the achievement of the SDGs ‎contributes significantly to the increase in economic growth rate. In addition, the SDGs also ‎have a positive and significant effect on people's Income, with a β value of 0.95 and a p-value ‎of 0.01, which is also smaller than 0.05. These findings show that the implementation of the ‎SDGs principles can accelerate economic growth and increase people's Income. Therefore, ‎development policies that support the achievement of the SDGs are critical to encouraging ‎sustainable economic welfare, and sustainable development policies to prioritize the ‎achievement of the SDGs goals to support long-term financial welfare.‎

    Practical implications: By systematically tracking these metrics, stakeholders can begin to ‎quantify how and to what extent CBD and SDG-integrated development in Nusantara influences ‎economic growth, people's incomes, and social-environmental wellbeing, grounding bold ‎national goals in tangible, measurable outcomes.‎

    Social implications: The development of Nusantara's CBD presents a pivotal opportunity to ‎create a just, inclusive, and culturally rooted capital if social dimensions are prioritized, ‎including the recognition and protection of the rights of indigenous peoples. Empower ‎communities in design and implementation. Foster inclusive spaces and equitable housing. ‎Promote social cohesion through cultural preservation. Monitor outcomes through SDG-aligned, ‎transparent frameworks. This is a rare opportunity for a socially resilient capital one that ‎reflects the SDG vision in motion, not just concrete and towers.‎

    Research limitations/implications: To robustly measure the impacts of CBD SDG on growth ‎and Income in Nusantara-affected populations, research must: bridge data and voice gaps ‎through mixed methods, apply rigorous quasi-experimental designs with control comparisons, ‎and Track outcomes longitudinally aligned with SDG metrics. Embed equity, ecological, and ‎governance dimensions into all analyses.‎

    Originality/value: By emphasizing the fusion of CBD planning, SDG integration, and local ‎Income methodological innovation, your research will stand out as an original and valuable ‎contribution, offering both academic rigor and high policy utility for Nusantara and beyond.

  • References

    1. Ahmad Ma’ruf, & Wihastuti, L. (2008). PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI INDONESIA: Determinan dan Prospeknya. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 9(1), 44–55.
    2. Ardi, A., Cahyadi, H., Sarwono, R., Limaho, H., Meilani, Y. F. C. P., & Pramono, R. (2023). The Importance of a Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) in Multinational and State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 4(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2023-04-03-04.
    3. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. (2023). Evaluasi Dampak Pembangunan CBD pada Perekonomian Masyarakat.
    4. Burton E. (2001). The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A preliminary Analysis. Journal of Urban Study. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050162184.
    5. Cardillo, M. A. dos R., & Basso, L. F. C. (2025). Revisiting knowledge on ESG/CSR and financial performance: A bibliometric and systematic re-view of moderating variables. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 10(1), 100648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100648.
    6. Chen, W., Du, X., Lan, W., Wu, W., & Zhao, M. (2023). How Can Digital Economy Development Empower High-Quality Economic Develop-ment? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(4), 1168–1194.
    7. Hall, P. (1998). Cities in Civilization: Culture, Innovation, and Urban Order. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
    8. Handoyo, R., Sofie, S., & Wardhani, N. (2023a). Implementasi Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs), Goal 8 Pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro Di Desa Padas, Kecamatan Karangnom Dan Desa Bonyokan, Kecamatan Jatinom, Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 10(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v10i1.16234.
    9. Handoyo, R., Sofie, S., & Wardhani, N. (2023b). Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Goal 8 among Micro Business Actors in Padas Village, Karangnom District and Bonyokan Village, Jatinom District, Klaten Regency. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 10(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v10i1.16234.
    10. Hoang, T. H. Van, Pham, L., & Nguyen, T. T. P. (2023). Does country sustainability improve firm ESG reporting transparency? The moderating role of firm industry and CSR engagement. Economic Modelling, 125(April), 106351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106351.
    11. Hoyt, H. (1939). The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Federal Housing Administration.
    12. Irhamsyah, F. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) dan Dampaknya Bagi Ketahanan Nasional. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 7(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v7i2.71.
    13. Jan, A. A., Lai, F. W., & Tahir, M. (2021). Developing an Islamic Corporate Governance framework to examine sustainability performance in Islam-ic Banks and Financial Institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315(March 2020), 128099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128099.
    14. Joseph F Hair. (2010). “Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (Vol. 7)” (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2010). 7, 2010.
    15. Jyoti, G., & Khanna, A. (2024). How does sustainability performance affect firms’ market performance? An empirical investigation in the Indian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 20457–20483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03482-9.
    16. Kaiser, Z. R. M. A., & Deb, A. (2025). Sustainable smart city and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review. Regional Sustainability, 6(1), 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100193.
    17. Kementrian PPN/Bappenas. (2021). Strategi Pembangunan Ibu Kota Nusantara. Bappenas.
    18. Kementrian PUPR. (2022). Laporan Pengembangan Infrastruktur Berkelanjutan di Ibu Kota Nusantara. Kementrian PUPR.
    19. Lamanda, G., & Tamásné, Z. V. (2025). Is banks’ ESG disclosure associated with financial depth and economic growth? Evidence from the Vise-grad Four countries. Environmental Development, 101233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101233.
    20. McNeill, D., & Connor, A. (2025). The logistical governance of vertical commuting in the central business district. Urban Studies, 62(4), 700–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241263226.
    21. Membretti, A., Taylor, S. J., & Delves, J. L. (2023). Sustainable Futures in Southern Africa’s Mountains: Multiple Perspectives on an Emerging City. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15773-8.
    22. Pormes, L., & Leiwakabessy, A. (2023). Sustainabilitas Pengusaha Kerajinan Gerabah Dalam Bingkai Kemiskinan Struktural (Studi Pada Desa Ouw Kecamatan Saparua) Ludwina. Jurnal Administrasi Terapan, 2(1), 179–188.
    23. Pratama, N. B., Purnomo, E. P., & Agustiyara, A. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan Di Daerah Is-timewa Yogyakarta. SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 6(2), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.30738/sosio.v6i2.8045.
    24. Rachmatullah, R., Endaryanto, T., & Affandi, M. I. (2021). Pengarusutamaan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) Program Pengentasan Kem-iskinan di Kota Pagar Alam. Tataloka, 23(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.2.239-251.
    25. Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning, 54(2), 73–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9.
    26. Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2019). Sustainable Development. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
    27. Saputra, M., & Hidayat, W. (2023). Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi pada Tingkat Kabupaten di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, Ejournal. Umma. Ac. Id. https://doi.org/10.22219/jie.v7i04.27061.
    28. Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Graha Ilmu.
    29. Schmider-Ramirez et al. (2015). PESTEL Analysis for organizational framework : the application and development. Mafalda Journal.
    30. Sekar Panuluh, & Fitri, M. R. (2015). Perkembangan Pelaksanaan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) di Indonesia. International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development, 2(September), 1–25.
    31. Shipley, R., & Snyder, M. (2013). The role of heritage conservation districts in achieving community economic development goals. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.660886.
    32. Simanjuntak, J., Muhammad, F., Al Aqilah, M. R., Raihannah, N. A., & Bakti, H. S. G. P. (2024). Potensi Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) Sebagai Katalisator Pemerataan Ekonomi Di Indonesia. Jurnalku, 4(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v4i3.801.
    33. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta.
    34. Tusquellas, N., Santiago, R., & Palau, R. (2025). Professional Development Analytics: A Smart Model for Industry 5.0. Applied Sciences, 15(4), 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042057.
    35. United Nation. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. United Nation.
    36. Usman, U., Wartoyo, W., Haida, N., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2024). Implementasi Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) Di Indonesia Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Al-Masharif: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Keislaman, 12(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.24952/masharif.v12i1.12446.
    37. Wang, J., Yu, J., & Zhong, R. (2023). Country environmental, social and governance performance and economic growth: The international evi-dence. Accounting and Finance, 63(4), 3911–3941. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13079.
    38. Wen, J., Fan, Z., & Liu, J. (2025). Effects of complex skyscraper geometries on wind energy potentials of high-density urban central business dis-trict: A case study of the Lujiazui blocks. Sustainable Cities and Society, 124, 106287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106287.
    39. Wheeler, S. M. (2000). Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable, Equitable, and Ecological Communities. Routledge.
    40. Wong, S. W., & Tang, B. sin. (2005). Challenges to the sustainability of “development zones”: A case study of Guangzhou Development District, China. Cities, 22(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.05.008.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Susanto, S. ., Amin, A., Padli, H. ., Joni, Y. ., Fithri, W. D. Z. ., Nurillah, S. L. ., Hardiyanti, I. S. ., Widoyo, H. ., Adelina, J. ., Irnayenti, & Marwini. (2025). Measuring The Influence of The Central Business DistrictDevelopment of SDGs on The Growth and Income of People ‎Affected by The Development of The New Nusantara Capital City. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(4), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.14419/q4d9fn39