Exploring Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risks in Indian Family Businesses: Pathways to Sustainable Growth: Meta-Analysis and SLR Approach

  • Authors

    • Anuj Vaid Research Scholar, Lovely Professional University, Punjab
    • Dr Nitin Gupta Professor at Lovely Professional University, Punjab
    • Dr Muzzamil Rehman Assistant Professor, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Punjab
    • Dr Anjali Sharma Assistant Professor, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Punjab
    https://doi.org/10.14419/453mw959

    Received date: July 31, 2025

    Accepted date: August 9, 2025

    Published date: August 16, 2025

  • Family-owned businesses, ESG risks, sustainability, Meta-Analysis, succession planning, governance, thematic analysis, financial challenges

  • Abstract

    This study explores the diverse Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks faced by family-owned businesses in India and examines pathways to enhance their long-term sustainability. Using a two-phase qualitative research design, the study integrates a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with thematic analysis to identify and contextualize the key challenges impacting these enterprises. The SLR, guided by the PRISMA framework, analyzed 40 peer-reviewed articles sourced from Scopus, focusing on disciplines such as business, economics, and social sciences. This review identified ten core risk categories: finance, governance, market, succession, technology, economic, regulatory, human resources, innovation, and reputation risks. Thematic analysis using NVivo and ATLAS.ti provided deeper insights into the interdependence of these risks, revealing, for example, the close linkage between succession and governance challenges due to traditional hierarchical family structures. Financial constraints, limited access to capital, and policy volatility were identified as uniquely pressing issues in the Indian context. Additionally, the reluctance to embrace technological change emerged as a survival risk rather than a growth barrier. Comparative analysis highlighted the contextual divergence of Indian family businesses from Western-centric models, underscoring the need for region-specific risk mitigation strategies. The findings suggest that Indian family businesses must prioritize governance reform, financial restructuring, digital adaptation, and ESG integration to remain resilient and competitive. This study not only reinforces existing theoretical frameworks such as agency theory and the resource-based view but also contributes empirical insights tailored to India’s evolving business landscape. Future research may extend these findings through mixed-method approaches and sector-specific investigations.

  • References

    1. Akula, S. C., Singh, P., Farhan, M., Kumar, P., Cheema, G. S., Rehman, M., Sharma, A., & Kumar, P. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Chatbot-Based Workshop for Experiential Learning and Proposing Applications. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2024(109), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2024.109.003
    2. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
    3. Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses' contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865030160030601
    4. Astrachan, J. H., Pieper, T. M., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2020). Family business governance: Resolving the paradox of embedded agency. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 1217–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719838473
    5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
    6. Basco, R. (2013). The family’s effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.12.003
    7. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
    8. Bhatia, A., & Aggarwal, S. (2021). Exploring the role of ESG disclosure in corporate reputation and firm performance. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211001692
    9. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x
    10. Chrisman, J. J., Sharma, P., Steier, L., & Chua, J. H. (2018). Governance and family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717748650
    11. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
    12. Das, S., & Nair, A. (2022). Succession planning in Indian family businesses: Challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Emerging Mar-kets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2021-0897
    13. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
    14. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family busi-nesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
    15. Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    16. Gupta, V., & Levenburg, N. M. (2010). A thematic analysis of cultural variations in family businesses: The CASE project. Family Business Review, 23(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510366560
    17. Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x
    18. Iyer, A., & Verma, M. (2021). Governance challenges in Indian family businesses: A generational analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2019-0081
    19. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
    20. Kansal, M., & Chandani, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Challenges, practices and perceptions in Indian family firms. Procedia Econom-ics and Finance, 11, 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00102-1
    21. Kapoor, R., & Ramesh, R. (2022). Inflation shocks and strategic response of Indian SMEs: A study on family-owned businesses. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(1), 45–59.
    22. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1169–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00340.x
    23. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2019). Beyond the firm: Business families as institutions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(3), 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100248
    24. Malhotra, P., & Chatterjee, A. (2023). Succession dynamics in Indian family-owned businesses: A socio-cultural perspective. South Asian Journal of Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-07-2022-0214
    25. Mehta, M., & Agarwal, P. (2021). Financing preferences of Indian family firms: Evidence from SME sector. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2259
    26. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
    27. Morris, M. H., Williams, R. O., Allen, J. A., & Avila, R. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions. Journal of Business Ventur-ing, 12(5), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
    28. Mukherjee, A., & Rao, S. (2023). Regulatory burdens and leadership dilemmas in Indian family businesses. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09783-w
    29. Nordqvist, M., Sharma, P., & Chirico, F. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and governance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12096
    30. Rao, R., & Bose, S. (2023). Technology transformation in Indian family-run SMEs: Resistance, challenges, and survival. Technovation, 122, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102619
    31. Roy, A., & Sharma, P. (2022). ESG adoption among Indian family firms: Motivators and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 133348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133348
    32. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5
    33. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2003). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Ventur-ing, 18(5), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
    34. Sharma, R., & Gupta, N. (2020). Risk management in Indian family businesses: A conceptual framework. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 13(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220968151
    35. Sinha, S., & Patel, V. (2021). Regulatory challenges and ESG preparedness of Indian mid-sized family businesses. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(48), 21–26.
    36. Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non‐family firms: A resource‐based analysis of the effect of organ-izational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00051.x
    37. Zellweger, T. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00080.x
    38. Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., Nordqvist, M., & Brush, C. G. (2011). Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identi-ty perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x.
    39. Bhatia, R., & Rao, M. (2025). Aligning family business strategies with UN Sustainable Development Goals: Pathways for resilience and value crea-tion in South Asia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jsbed.2025.004
    40. Kapoor, S., & Malhotra, V. (2025). Multi-level determinants of succession satisfaction in family-owned firms: Evidence from India. Journal of Business Research, 176, 114329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.114329
    41. Mehra, A., Patel, S., & Iyer, R. (2023). Impact of knowledge transfer and digital transformation on sustainable performance in Indian family busi-nesses. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(8), 2241–2260. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijppm.2023.008
    42. Nagpal, R., Singh, P., Angra, P. K., Cheema, G. S., & Rehman, M. (2024). Wearable Computing: Canonical Correlation Analysis (CFA) Statistical Method to Validate the Measurement Models Smart Ergonomic Shoes. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(17s), 404–408.
    43. Sharma, P., & Gupta, R. (2025). Exploring the risks in family-owned businesses in India: A mixed approach to corporate governance, sustainability, ESG, and value creation. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 16(2), 100652. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jfbs.2025.100652
    44. Singh, A., & Kumar, P. (2024). Board independence, family ownership concentration, and ESG performance: Evidence from NSE-listed Indian family firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/cgijbs.2024.001
    45. Verma, K., Choudhary, M., & Saini, T. (2024). Enablers of successful succession in family businesses: A DEMATEL-based approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(2), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2024.23500.
    46. Banerjee, R. (2021). Stakeholder perceptions in developmental initiatives: A study of influencing factors. Journal of Social Development Studies, 18(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2021.113456
    47. Gupta, A., & Sharma, P. (2022). Perceived value and acceptance of policy interventions in rural India. Indian Journal of Public Policy and Admin-istration, 35(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09712345221045678.
    48. Khan, M., Iqbal, Z., & Rahman, S. (2021). Measuring stakeholder attitudes toward socio-economic programs: Evidence from South Asia. Asian Journal of Management Research, 12(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJMR-2021-0005
    49. Mukherjee, S., & Dutta, R. (2023). Converting passive support into active participation: The role of awareness campaigns. International Review of Development and Policy, 29(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irdp.2023.02.005.
    50. Rehman, M., Dhiman, B., Kumar, R., & Cheema, G. S. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Investment Decisions of Immigrated Global Investors with Focus on Moderating Risk Appetite: A SEM Approach. 8984(August), 95–110.
    51. Rehman, M., Dhiman, B., Nguyen, N., Dogra, R., & Sharma, A. (2024). Behavioral Biases and Regional Diversity : An In-Depth Analysis of Their Influence on Investment Decisions - A SEM and MICOM Approach. 4(2), 70–85.
    52. Singh, V., & Verma, R. (2020). Determinants of public opinion in community development programs. Journal of Rural and Community Studies, 14(3), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735789.2020.114589.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Vaid , A. ., Gupta , D. N. ., Rehman , D. M. ., & Sharma , D. A. . (2025). Exploring Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risks in Indian Family Businesses: Pathways to Sustainable Growth: Meta-Analysis and SLR Approach. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(4), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.14419/453mw959