Responsible Investment and Sustainability: Systematic Literature Review

  • Authors

    • Boussetta Marwane Laboratory of Research in Entrepreneurship and Management of Organizations (REMO), Fez Business School, Private University of Fez
    • Ababou Mariame Laboratory of Research in Entrepreneurship and Management of Organizations (REMO), Fez Business School, Private University of Fez
    • Faquir Sanaa Laboratory of Smart Systems, Energy and Sustainable Development (SIEDD), Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Private University of Fez and Engineering and Technology Department, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology, NY, USA
    https://doi.org/10.14419/2918ap08

    Received date: July 29, 2025

    Accepted date: September 2, 2025

    Published date: September 6, 2025

  • Decision-Making, Environmental Information, Financial Performance, Responsible Investment, Sustainable Development

  • Abstract

    This systematic literature review explores how environmental information influences investment decisions and financial performance within responsible investment (RI). Analyzing 39 key articles reveals RI's potential to drive environmental change and contribute to long-term sustainability goals.

    Companies are disclosing more ESG (environmental, social, and governance) information due to investor pressure and the value of transparency. Investor behavior is influenced by ESG data, but concerns about greenwashing and social movements can also impact choices. Strong corporate governance is crucial for fostering robust ESG practices.

    The review highlights the need for standardized ESG metrics, long-term impact studies of RI, and greenwashing mitigation strategies. It also emphasizes exploring social and governance aspects of ESG and promoting RI in developing economies. By addressing these areas, stakeholders can collaborate to maximize RI's positive impact and build a more sustainable future.

  • References

    1. Abhayawansa, S., Adams, C.A., Neesham, C., 2021. Accountability and Governance in Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: Conceptualis-ing how governments create value. Account. Audit. Account. 34. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-07-2020-4667
    2. Ahern, J., 2013. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landsc. Ecol. 28, 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
    3. Alshbili, I., Elamer, A.A., Moustafa, M.W., 2021. Social and environmental reporting, sustainable development and institutional voids: Evidence from a developing country. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 28, 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2096
    4. Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigne, E., Aldas-Manzano, J., Curras-Perez, R., 2017. A Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Re-sponsibility Following the Sustainable Development Paradigm. J. Bus. Ethics 140, 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2654-9
    5. Amer, E., 2018. The Penalization of Non-Communicating UN Global Compact’s Companies by Investors and Its Implications for This Initiative’s Effectiveness. Bus. Soc. 57, 255–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315609303
    6. Amran, A., Ooi, S.K., Mydin, R.T., Devi, S.S., 2015. The Impact of Business Strategies on Online Sustainability Disclosures. Bus. Strategy Envi-ron. 24, 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1837
    7. Ansar, A., Caldecott, B., Tilbury, J., 2013. Stranded assets and the fossil fuel divestment campaign: what does divestment mean for the valuation of fossil fuel assets? Stranded Assets Foss. Fuel Divest. Campaign.
    8. Aouadi, A., Marsat, S., 2018. Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data. J. Bus. Ethics 151, 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
    9. Arthur, C.L., Wu, J., Yago, M., Zhang, J., 2017. Investigating performance indicators disclosure in sustainability reports of large mining companies in Ghana. Corp. Gov. Bingley 17, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2016-0124
    10. Ayling, J., Gunningham, N., 2017. Non-state governance and climate policy: the fossil fuel divestment movement. Clim. Policy 17, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1094729
    11. Bassen, A., Gödker, K., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Oll, J., 2019. Climate Information in Retail Investors’ Decision-Making: Evidence From a Choice Ex-periment. Organ. Environ. 32, 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618771669
    12. Bina, O., 2013. The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31, 1023–1047. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j
    13. Boiral, O., Talbot, D., Brotherton, M.-C., 2020. Measuring sustainability risks: A rational myth? Bus. Strategy Environ. 29, 2557–2571. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2520
    14. Butlin, J., 1989. Our common future. By World commission on environment and development. (London, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp.383 £5.95.). J. Int. Dev. 1, 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3380010208
    15. Christensen, H.B., Hail, L., Leuz, C., 2021. Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Rev. Account. Stud. 26, 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
    16. de Souza Barbosa, A., da Silva, M.C.B.C., da Silva, L.B., Morioka, S.N., de Souza, V.F., 2023. Integration of Environmental, Social, and Govern-ance (ESG) criteria: their impacts on corporate sustainability performance. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01919-0
    17. Denyer, D., Neely, A., 2004. Introduction to special issue: Innovation and productivity performance in the UK - Denyer - 2004 - International Journal of Management Reviews - Wiley Online Library [WWW Document]. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00100.x (accessed 4.3.24).
    18. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., Zwergel, B., 2020. The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. J. Bus. Ethics 167, 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
    19. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K., 2002. Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Univ. StGallen 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
    20. Eng, N., Troy, C.L.C., Bortree, D.S., 2024. Symbolic and substantive legitimation: examining corporate commitments to sustainable development goal 12. J. Commun. Manag. 28, 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-06-2022-0075
    21. Farley, H.M., Smith, Z.A., 2020. Sustainability: If It’s Everything, Is It Nothing?, 2nd ed. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351124928
    22. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., Kaiser, S., 2018. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Glob. Finance J. 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
    23. Galant, A., Cadez, S., 2017. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraz. 30, 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122
    24. Gatti, L., Pizzetti, M., Seele, P., 2021. Green lies and their effect on intention to invest. J. Bus. Res. 127, 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.028
    25. Gödker, K., Mertins, L., 2018. CSR Disclosure and Investor Behavior: A Proposed Framework and Research Agenda. Behav. Res. Account. 30. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51976
    26. Gore, C., 2015. The Post-2015 Moment: Towards Sustainable Development Goals and a New Global Development Paradigm. J. Int. Dev. 27, 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3109
    27. Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., Kotzian, P., Feder, M., Weißenberger, B.E., 2021. Legitimation Strategies as Valuable Signals in Nonfinancial Reporting? Effects on Investor Decision-Making. Bus. Soc. 60, 943–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319872495
    28. Hendijani Zadeh, M., 2021. The effect of corporate social responsibility transparency on corporate payout policies. Int. J. Manag. Finance 17, 708–732. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-07-2020-0386
    29. Hossain, M.M., Wang, L., Yu, J., 2024. The reputational costs of corporate environmental underperformance: evidence from China. Bus. Strategy Environ. 33, 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3528
    30. Hotten, R., 2015. Volkswagen: The scandal explained. BBC News.
    31. Jain, T., Jamali, D., 2016. Looking Inside the Black Box: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 24, 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154
    32. Khaireddine, H., Lacombe, I., Jarboui, A., 2024. The trilogy in sustainability of environmental performance, assurance quality and firm value. Sus-tain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 15, 482–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2022-0352
    33. Khamisu, M.S., Paluri, R.A., Sonwaney, V., 2024. Environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure motives for environmentally sensitive industry: an emerging economy perspective. Cogent Bus. Manag. 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2322027
    34. Lambert, A.J.D., Boons, F.A., 2002. Eco-industrial parks: Stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation 22, 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00040-2
    35. Laufer, W.S., 2003. Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing. J. Bus. Ethics 43, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022962719299
    36. Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X.-Y., Koh, L., 2018. The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. Br. Account. Rev. 50, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007
    37. Lokuwaduge, C.S.D.S., Heenetigala, K., 2017. Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Develop-ment: An Australian Study. Bus. Strategy Environ. 26, 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927
    38. Lyon, T.P., Montgomery, A.W., 2015. The Means and End of Greenwash. Organ. Environ. 28, 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
    39. Malik, M., 2015. Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature. J. Bus. Ethics 127, 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2051-9
    40. Mebratu, D., 1998. Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 18, 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
    41. Mitlin, D., 1992. Sustainable Development: A Guide to the Literature. Environ. Urban. - Env. URBAN 4, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400112
    42. Ntim, C.G., Soobaroyen, T., 2013. Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 21, 468–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12026
    43. Ordanini, A., Rubera, G., DeFillippi, R., 2008. The many moods of inter-organizational imitation: A critical review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 10, 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00233.x
    44. Pavláková Dočekalová, M., Kocmanová, A., Meluzín, T., Škapa, S., 2022. Modelling of the relationship between sustainability and shareholder wealtH. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 28, 854–871. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.16480
    45. Perez-Batres, L., Doh, J., Miller, V., Pisani, M., 2012. Stakeholder Pressures as Determinants of CSR Strategic Choice: Why do Firms Choose Symbolic Versus Substantive Self-Regulatory Codes of Conduct? J. Bus. Ethics 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1419-y
    46. Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Bachrach, D.G., Podsakoff, N.P., 2005. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strateg. Manag. J. 26, 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454
    47. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., Tharyan, R., 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. Br. Account. Rev. 48, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
    48. Redclift, M., 2005. Sustainable development (1987-2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustain. Dev. 13, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281
    49. Sachdeva, M., Lehal, R., Gupta, S., Gupta, S., 2023. Influence of contextual factors on investment decision-making: a fuzzy-AHP approach. J. Asia Bus. Stud. 17, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2021-0376
    50. Sariannidis, N., Zafeiriou, E., Giannarakis, G., Arabatzis, G., 2013. CO2 Emissions and Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Firms: An Empirical Survey. Bus. Strategy Environ. 22, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1737
    51. Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., Weber, U., 2019. The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732
    52. Singh, S.K., Giudice, M.D., Chierici, R., Graziano, D., 2020. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762
    53. Thanki, H., Shah, S., Rathod, H.S., Oza, A.D., Burduhos-Nergis, D.D., 2022. I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Op-tions Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI. Sustain. Switz. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811377
    54. Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., Pittaway, L., 2005. Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evi-dence. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 7, 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x
    55. Tsang, A., Frost, T., Cao, H., 2023. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. Br. Account. Rev. 55, 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101149
    56. United Nations, 2020. Shared Responsibility, Global Solidarity: Responding to the Socio-Economic Impacts of COVID-19. 2020. URL https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/SG-Report-Socio-Economic-Impact-of-Covid19.pdf (accessed 4.2.24).
    57. United Nations, 2017. European Commission. The New European Consensus on Development—EU and Member States Sign Joint Strategy to Eradicate Poverty. URL https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1503 (accessed 4.2.24).
    58. van Marrewijk, M., 2003. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. J. Bus. Ethics 44, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247
    59. Wang, Y., Xu, M., 2023. Can ESG activities stabilise IPO prices? Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market. Eur. Financ. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12452
    60. Wendai, L., Jing, F., Li, B., 2022. Does More Voluntary Environmental Information Disclosure Cut Down the Cost of Equity Heavy Pollution In-dustries in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21620-0
    61. Wojtaszek, H., Miciuła, I., Gac, M., Kabus, D., Balcerzyk, R., Będźmirowski, J., Kowalczyk, A., 2023. Social and Environmental Responsibility Manager on the Example of Companies from Poland and Germany. Sustain. Switz. 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914359
    62. Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., Lin, L., Zeng, H., Chen, X., 2020. Carbon risk management and corporate competitive advantages: “Differential promotion” or “cost hindrance”? Bus. Strategy Environ. 29, 1764–1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2468

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Marwane , B. ., Mariame , A. ., & Sanaa , F. . (2025). Responsible Investment and Sustainability: Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 272-282. https://doi.org/10.14419/2918ap08