The Influence of High-Performance Work Systems and‎Organizational Culture and Employee Performance Mediated by ‎Abilities, Motivation, and Career Opportunities in The Kendari City ‎Government

  • Authors

    • Indira Yuana Dr. Research Scholar, Department of Science Study Program, Faculty of Science Study Program, Haluoleo University, Kendari, ‎Southeast Sulawesi, 93232, Indonesia
    • Rahmad Madjid Prof. Research Supervisor, Department of Management Science, Faculty of Management Science, Haluoleo University, Kendari, Southeast ‎Sulawesi, 93232, Indonesia
    • Rosnawintang Prof. Research Supervisor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management Science, Haluoleo University, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, ‎‎93232, Indonesia
    • La Ode Bahana Adam Dr. Research Supervisor, Department of Management Science, Faculty of Management Science, Haluoleo University, Kendari, Southeast ‎Sulawesi, 93232, Indonesia
    https://doi.org/10.14419/yrkmvd45

    Received date: July 20, 2025

    Accepted date: September 8, 2025

    Published date: September 19, 2025

  • High Performance Work System; Organizational Culture; Ability; Motivation; Career Opportunities; Performance

  • Abstract

    The population was ‎329 people on the State Civil Apparatus of Kendari City Government Regional Services and Agencies, using the ‎Proportionate Stratified Random Sampling technique. Research variable data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with ‎the AMOS program. The research results show that: (1) a high-performance work system has a positive and significant effect on ability, ‎motivation and career opportunities, but the positive effect is not significant on employee performance; (2) organizational culture has a positive ‎and significant effect on abilities and career opportunities, but the positive effect is not significant on employee motivation and performance; ‎‎(3) ability and career opportunities influence employee performance, but motivation does not significantly influence employee performance; ‎‎(4) high-performance work systems influence employee performance mediated by ability and career opportunities, but motivation does not ‎mediate the influence of high-performance work systems on employee performance; (5) organizational culture influences employee ‎performance mediated by abilities and career opportunities, but motivation does not mediate the influence of organizational culture on ‎employee performance.

  • References

    1. Appelbaum, E. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
    2. Arianto, Nurmin., Kurniawan, Hadi. (2020). JENIUS: Jurnal Ilmiah, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. 3(3), 312-321. https://doi.org/10.32493/JJSDM.v3i3.4869.
    3. Ariwibowo, Joko., dkk. (2022). Pengaruh Peluang Karir Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Motivasi Kerja Dan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi Pada Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Sulawesi Barat. ECOBISMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Management. 9(2), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v9i2.2433.
    4. Armstrong, M. and Brown, D. (2019) ‘Strategic Human Resource Management : Back to the future ? A literature review’.
    5. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y. M., dan Otaye, L. E. (2012). Impact of High-Performance Work Systems on Individual- and Branch-Level Performance: Test of a Multilevel Model of Intermediate Linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025739.
    6. Cascio, W.F. (1992). Managing Human Resources: Producttivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits, (third Ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.
    7. Combs, et al. (2006). How Much Do High-Performance Work Practices Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Their Effects on Organizational Performance. Personnel Psychology. 59, 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x.
    8. Combs, J.G., Liu, Y., Hall, A. and Ketchen, D.J. (2006). How much do high work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organiza-tional performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x.
    9. Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Cascio, W. F. (2021). Global talent management and performance in multinational enterprises: A review and re-search agenda. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101182.
    10. Ciancarini, P., Giancarlo, R., & Grimaudo, G. (2023). Digital transformation in public administration: A guide for computer scientists. arXiv pre-print arXiv:2305.05551. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05551.
    11. Den Hartog, D.N. and Verburg, R.M. (2004), “High performance work systems, organizational culture and firm effectiveness”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00112.x.
    12. Djatmiko, dkk. (2023). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil Melalui Motivasi Kerja Pada Kantor Badan Pendapa-tan Daerah. Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi (Sostech). Vol(3), No(2). E-ISSN 2774-5155. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v3i2.640.
    13. Dewi, T. S., & Abadi, F. (2024). The effect of HPWS on organizational citizenship behavior with psychological well-being and organizational commitment as mediators. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(12), 511. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i12.511.
    14. Edgar, Fiona., et al. (2020). Gender And Job Performance: Linking the High-Performance Work System with The Ability–Motivation–Opportunity Framework. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2019-0577.
    15. Edgar, Fiona., et al. (2020). The HPWS and AMO: a dynamic study of system- and individual-level effects. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2019-0541.Eko, Widodo Suparno. (2015). Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.Yogyakarta: PUSTAKA PELAJAR.
    16. Fadli, Faisal, Mochammad. (2020). Pengaruh Motivasi, Kemampuan dan Kesempatan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Rumah Sakit Umum Dae-rah Nanga Pinoh Kabupaten Melawi. Integra. 10(1), 041-062. E-ISSN 2581-0340.
    17. Fitrianti, Nur Rani, dkk. (2022). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Dengan Kemampuan Kerja Se-bagai Variabel Mediasi (Studi Pada PT Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jawa Timur Tbk Cabang Pamekasan). JUMBIWIRA: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Kewirausahaan. 1(1). E ISSN: 2829-2502. https://doi.org/10.51195/iga.v10i1.137.
    18. Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2015). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction in the U.S. federal bureaucracy: A test of mediation effects. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 146-168. https://doi.org/10.56910/jumbiwira.v1i1.34.
    19. Ghozali, Imam, Hengky Latan. (2015). Konsep, Teknik, Aplikasi Menggunakan Smart PLS 3.0 Untuk Penelitian Empiris. BP Undip. Semarang.
    20. Gibson, James L. et al. (2012). Organizations. New York: McGraw Hill.
    21. Gittel, Jody Hoffer., Seidner, Rob., dan Wimbush, Julian. (2010). A Relational Model of High-Performance Work Systems Work. Organization Science. ISSN: 1526-5455. Vol. 21 (2): hal. 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0446
    22. Gusharyani, N., Rahmat, A., & Seswandi, A. (2023). The impact of HPWS on organizational citizenship behavior through work engagement in re-gional hospitals. Jurnal Komunitas Sains Manajemen, 2(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0446.
    23. Haqq, N. (2016). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan melalui Motivasi Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening Studi pada PT. Rahmat Jaya Perkasa Sidoarjo. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen 9 (1): 56-68.
    24. Huseno, T. (2016). Kinerja Pegawai: Tinjauan Dari Dimensi Kepemimpinan, Misi Organisasi, Budaya Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja. Malang: Me-dia Nusa Creative. https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v9n1.p56-68.
    25. Hofstede Insights. (2023). Country comparison: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/indonesia/
    26. Jiang, K., Lepak, D.P., Hu, J. and Baer, J.C. (2012b). “How does human resource management influence organisational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55, pp. 1264-1294.
    27. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
    28. Kreitner, Robert dan Angelo Kinicki. (2014). Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi 9. Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088.
    29. Khossy, M. N., & Kustiawan, U. (2023). The effect of HPWS on work performance through job responsibility and work fatigue. Journal of Eco-nomic, Business and Accounting (COSTING), 7(2), 7319.
    30. Leonardi, V., & Panggabean, H. R. G. (2021). Pengaruh persepsi peluang karier terhadap keinginan berhenti kerja karyawan yang dimediasi oleh komitmen organisasi. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 8, 227–246. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i2.7319.
    31. Luthans, Fred. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Sepuluh. PT. Andi: Yogyakarta. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu123.
    32. Luthans, Fred. (2014). Perilaku Organisasi, (Alih Bahasa V.A Yuwono, dkk), Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Yogyakarta.
    33. Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between “high-performance work practices” and employee attitudes: An investigation of additive and interaction effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 537-567.
    34. Marin-Garcia, JA., & Tomas, JM. (2016). Deconstructing AMO framework: A systematic review. Intangible Capital. 12(4), 1040-1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601178745.
    35. Maslow, Abraham H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Bros. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.838.
    36. Masram dan Mu’ah. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Sidoarjo. Zifatama Publiser.
    37. Mathis dan Jackson. (2003). Human Resource Management. Cetakan Kesepuluh, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
    38. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (2021). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Routledge.
    39. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2022). Employee voice and employee performance: Examining the moderating role of job characteristics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95(1), 120-139.
    40. Ng, E. S. W., Parry, E., & Lee, H. W. (2023). Understanding the role of career opportunities in public sector employee motivation. Public Personnel Management, 52(1), 45-65.
    41. Özçelik, G., Aybas, M., & Uyargil, C. (2016). High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Values: Resource-based View Considerations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 332–341.
    42. Putra, Hutama Nararia., dkk. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Belajar Nonformal Terhadap Kemampuan Berkomunikasi Antarbudaya Dengan Mediasi Motivasi Diri Anggota Polyglot Indonesia. 5(1), 38-47. e-ISSN 2541-1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.040.
    43. Robbins, S., Coulter, M. (2012). Manajemen. Eleventh Edition. Jakarta: England.
    44. Robbins, Stephen P & Judge, Timothy A. (2013). Organizational Behavior Edition 15. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
    45. Robbins, Stephen P dan Timothy A Judge. (2014). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
    46. Rostanti, Linda Felecia., dkk. (2016). Analisis Pengembangan Karier Pegawai Negeri Sipil Berdasarkan UndangUndang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Ten-tang ASN di BKD Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Media.Neliti.Com. https://media. neliti.com/media/ publications/94635- ID-analisis-pengembangan-karierpegawai-neg.pdf.
    47. Sari, R. N. I., & Hadijah, H. S. (2016). Peningkatan Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 204.
    48. Sedarmayanti. 2017. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan SDM untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi, Kinerja dan Produktivitas Kerja. PT Refika Adita-ma. Bandung. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3389.
    49. Sedana, I. W. A., Utari Dewi, N. D., & Widnyani, I. A. P. S. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of digital transformation in public administra-tion. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 23(1), 437.
    50. Way, S. A. (2002). High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the US small business sector. Journal of Management, 28: 765-785.
    51. Widodo. (2011). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Budaya organisasi, dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur. (17). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00191-5.
    52. Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Number 30 of 2019 concerning Civil Servant Performance Evaluation. Supplement to the State Ga-zette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6340.
    53. Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2023 concerning Working Days and State Civil Service Employees. State Ga-zette of the Republic of Indonesia 2023 Number 50.
    54. Kendari Mayor Regulation Number 9 of 2018 concerning Providing Additional Income for Civil Servants Based on the Kendari City Government Scope Performance Assessment. Kendari City Regional News 2018.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Yuana , I. ., Madjid, R., Rosnawintang, & Adam, L. O. B. . (2025). The Influence of High-Performance Work Systems and‎Organizational Culture and Employee Performance Mediated by ‎Abilities, Motivation, and Career Opportunities in The Kendari City ‎Government. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 791-804. https://doi.org/10.14419/yrkmvd45