Employee Engagement Mediates The HR PracticesPerformance Relationship in ITES: A Quantitative Study

  • Authors

    • Sangeetha M Ph.D. (IFT) Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, School of Social Science and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, ‎Vellore
    • Dr. Vijayaraj K Assistant Professor (Sr) & Research Supervisor, Department of Commerce, School of Social Science and Languages, Vellore Institute ‎of Technology, Vellore
    https://doi.org/10.14419/kxqde586

    Received date: July 17, 2025

    Accepted date: August 25, 2025

    Published date: September 1, 2025

  • Employee Engagement; HR Practices; Organizational Performance; Mediation Analysis; ITES Industry
  • Abstract

    This study uses PLS-SEM analysis to examine how employee engagement mediates the link between HR practices and organizational ‎performance in the Indian ITES industry. A standardized questionnaire measuring corporate performance, employee engagement, and ‎HR procedures was used to gather data from 300 ITES experts. The findings show that employee engagement has a high impact on ‎organizational success (β = 0.580), whereas HR practices have a lesser but beneficial direct effect on organizational performance (β = ‎‎0.164). With a substantial indirect impact (B = 0.3017) in the –HR-performance link, mediation analysis validates the partial mediating ‎function of employee engagement. With intermediate explanatory power, the model was able to explain 43.5% of the variance in organizational performance and 14.3% of the variance in employee engagement. The results highlight how good HR procedures increase em-‎employee engagement, which significantly enhances organizational results and is consistent with social exchange theory. In addition to ‎offering HR managers useful advice on how to create engagement-centric HR strategies to boost organizational competitiveness in the ‎dynamic ITES sector, this study adds empirical support for the HR–engagement–performance route to the body of knowledge in HRM‎.

  • References

    1. Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust, and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2012-0019.
    2. Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 2(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-0042.
    3. Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Per-formance Management, 63(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008.
    4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476.
    5. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implica-tions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.
    6. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40765-8.
    7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    8. Cooke, F. L., & Saini, D. S. (2010). Managing diversity in Chinese and Indian organizations: A qualitative study. Journal of Chinese Human Re-source Management, 1(2), 154–165.
    9. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acad-emy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949–969. https://doi.org/10.5465/256718.
    10. Gallup. (2020). State of the global workplace report. https://www.gallup.com.
    11. Gallup. (2023). State of the global workplace: 2023 report. Gallup Press. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx.
    12. Ghosh, K., Sekiguchi, T., & Gurunathan, L. (2017). Organizational embeddedness as a mediator between justice and employee outcomes: A study of Indian managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(22), 3149–3178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1155164.
    13. Guest, D. E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00164.x.
    14. Gupta, M., & Sharma, P. (2016). Creating satisfied employees through workplace spirituality: A study of the Indian manufacturing sector. Journal of Human Values, 22(2), 165–176.
    15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.3926/oss.37.
    16. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1.
    17. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.268.
    18. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
    19. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation model-ing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
    20. Jantan, H., Hamdan, A. R., & Othman, Z. A. (2010). Human talent prediction in HRM using C4.5 classification algorithm. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2(8), 2526–2534.
    21. Jawaad, M., & Singh, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and HR analytics: Transforming human resource management practices. Journal of Work and Management, 16(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-12-2024-0179.
    22. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088.
    23. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287.
    24. Kaur, P., & Arora, A. (2020). Machine learning techniques for predicting employee attrition in organizations. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.06.007.
    25. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x.
    26. Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Giannakos, M. (2018). Big data analytics and firm performance: Findings from a mixed-method approach. Journal of Business Research, 98, 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010.
    27. Min, H., Kim, I., & Chen, H. (2016). Developing a decision support framework for performance-based evaluation of service quality in the airline industry. Transportation Journal, 55(1), 98–115.
    28. Quantum Workplace. (2023). Employee engagement trends 2023: Insights for the future of work. Quantum Workplace. https://www.quantumworkplace.com/future-of-work/employee-engagement-trends.
    29. Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2021). Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. Information Systems Research, 32(3), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1026.
    30. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169.
    31. Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Per-formance, 6(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034.
    32. Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21187.
    33. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248.
    34. Sharma, P., & Kapoor, S. (2025). Digital transformation and workforce engagement in India’s ITES sector: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Jour-nal of Human Resources. Advance online publication.
    35. Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042796.
    36. Shuck, B., & Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309353560.
    37. Shuck, B., Reio, T. G., & Zigarmi, D. (2023). Employee engagement in the age of AI: Challenges and opportunities for HR leaders. Human Re-source Development International, 26(4), 421–439.
    38. Torraco, R. J., & Swanson, R. A. (1995). The strategic roles of human resource development. Human Resource Planning, 18(4), 10–21.
    39. Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest, & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 97–110). Wiley.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    M, S. ., & K, D. V. . (2025). Employee Engagement Mediates The HR PracticesPerformance Relationship in ITES: A Quantitative Study. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.14419/kxqde586