Market Volatility and Equity Risk Factors: Dynamic Interac‎tions, Implications, and Evidence from India

Kuntal Dutta; Kriti Bhaswar Singh

doi:10.14419/gg0bsf44

Article Summary Abstract References Full Article How to cite

Authors
- Kuntal Dutta Research scholar, Central University of Jharkhand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8836-9739
- Kriti Bhaswar Singh Associate Professor, Central University of Jharkhand https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-8731
https://doi.org/10.14419/gg0bsf44

Received date: July 11, 2025

Accepted date: August 31, 2025

Published date: September 6, 2025
Asset Pricing Factors; Equity Risk Factors; Granger Causality; Impulse Response Function; India VIX
Abstract

This study examines the influence of investor sentiment, as captured by the India VIX, in conjunction with the Fama-French factors and ‎Carhart’s momentum factor, on equity risk premia in the Indian stock market. By focusing on periods of heightened uncertainty, specifically ‎the subprime crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, the research explores how market volatility and risk factors interact to shape stock returns. ‎Using Granger causality tests, the analysis uncovers directional relationships between the India VIX and various equity risk premia, while ‎Impulse Response Functions and Variance Decomposition are employed to understand shock transmission and the sources of volatility ‎among factors. The findings indicate strong interconnectedness between market volatility (VIX) and key risk factors, particularly the market ‎risk premium and momentum. Notably, the study identifies a bidirectional causality between the size and market risk premia, emphasizing ‎the pivotal role of the size factor during periods of increased volatility. Variance decomposition results further reveal that, although risk ‎premia are predominantly influenced by their own shocks, there are modest interactions across different factors, underscoring the broader ‎influence of market sentiment. The results suggest that tracking market volatility can enhance portfolio adjustment strategies during turbulent ‎times. This research is limited to the Indian context and specific asset pricing factors, suggesting future studies should consider cross-country analyses and incorporate additional behavioral variables. Overall, the study provides new insights into the dynamic interplay be-‎tween investor sentiment and asset pricing, offering valuable guidance for investors, financial strategists, and policymakers aiming to better ‎understand and navigate periods of market stress‎.
References
1. Adelino, J., & Kim, S. (1996). SMALL FIRM AND STOCK RETURN SEASONALITY: (NEW) EVIDENCE FROM THE LISBON STOCK EXCHANGE. Global Business and Finance Review, 1(2), 55–66. Retrieved from https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/file/view?downOrView=pdf&schlrCmdtcode=4010023852315&artlNum=10122160&artlName=SMALL%20FIRM%20AND%20STOCK%20RETURN%20SEASONALITY%3A%20(NEW)%20EVIDENCE%20FROM%20THE%20LISBON%20STOCK%20EXCHANGE.
2. Agarwalla, S. K., Jacob, J., & Varma, J. R. (2013). Four Factor Model in Indian Equities Market. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2334482.
3. Ahn, D.-H., Min, B.-K., & Yoon, B. (2019). Why has the size effect disappeared? Journal of Banking & Finance, 102, 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.02.005.
4. Alhenawi, Y. (2015). On the interaction between momentum effect and size effect. Review of Financial Economics, 26, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.005.
5. Ansari, V. A., & Khan, S. (2012). Momentum anomaly: evidence from India. Managerial Finance, 38(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351211193730.
6. Asness, C., Frazzini, A., Israel, R., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2018). Size matters, if you control your junk. Journal of Financial Eco-nomics, 129(3), 479–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.006.
7. Bakshi, G., & Kapadia, N. (2003). Delta-Hedged Gains and the Negative Market Volatility Risk Premium. Review of Financial Studies, 16(2), 527–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg002.
8. Balakrishnan, A. (2016). Size, value, and momentum effects in stock returns: Evidence from India. Vision, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916628929.
9. Barik, N., & Balakrishnan, A. (2022). Are momentum profits influenced by idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from India. IIMB Management Re-view, 34(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2022.03.003.
10. Boussaidi, R., & Dridi, G. (2020). The momentum effect in the Tunisian stock market: Risk hypothesis vs. underreaction hypothesis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.01.002.
11. Božović, M. (2024). VIX-managed portfolios. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103353.
12. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x.
13. Chandra, A., & Thenmozhi, M. (2015a). On asymmetric relationship of India volatility index (India VIX) with stock market return and risk man-agement. DECISION, 42(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-014-0070-0.
14. Chandra, A., & Thenmozhi, M. (2015b). On asymmetric relationship of India volatility index (India VIX) with stock market return and risk man-agement. DECISION, 42(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-014-0070-0.
15. Chhimwal, B., & Bapat, V. (2021). Comparative Study of Momentum and Contrarian Behavior of Different Investors: Evidence from the Indian Market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 28(1), 19–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-020-09315-3.
16. Chun, S. (2021). Forecasting the Equity Risk Premium in the Korean Stock Market: A Factor Analysis Approach. Global Business and Finance Re-view, 26(4), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2021.26.4.77.
17. Deb, S. G., & Mishra, B. (2019). A new insight into value premium and size premium. IIMB Management Review, 31(4), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.004.
18. Durand, R. B., Lim, D., & Zumwalt, J. K. (2011). Fear and the Fama-French Factors. Financial Management, 40(2), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2011.01147.x.
19. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds*. In Journal of Financial Economics (Vol. 33). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5.
20. French, K. R., Schwert, G. W., & Stambaugh, R. F. (1987). Expected stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(87)90026-2.
21. Giot, P. (2005). Relationships Between Implied Volatility Indexes and Stock Index Returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 31(3), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2005.500363.
22. Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7.
23. Grinblatt, M. (2000). The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: a study of Finland’s unique data set. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00044-6.
24. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691218632.
25. Hitz, L., Mustafi, I. H., & Zimmermann, H. (2022). The pricing of volatility risk in the US equity market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101951.
26. Houge, T., & Lughran, T. (2006). Do Invesrtors Capture the Value Premium? Financial Management, 35(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2006.tb00139.x.
27. Hur, J., & Singh, V. (2016). Reexamining momentum profits: Underreaction or overreaction to firm-specific information? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 46(2), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-014-0469-x.
28. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. In Source: The Jour-nal of Finance (Vol. 48). https://doi.org/10.2307/2328882.
29. Jiang, G. J., & Zhu, K. X. (2017). Information Shocks and Short-Term Market Underreaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.06.006.
30. Khan, H. A., & Chahal, R. J. K. (2025). Asymmetric impact of social media sentiments and stock market uncertainty on Indian sectoral returns: A quantile-on-quantile approach. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 79, 102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2025.102456.
31. Kim, S., & In, F. (2007). On the relationship between changes in stock prices and bond yields in the G7 countries: Wavelet analysis. Journal of In-ternational Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 17(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2005.10.004.
32. Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119.
33. Meng, C., Chen, C., Xu, H., & Li, T. (2024). Asset pricing and portfolio investment management using machine learning: Research trend analysis using scientometrics. Economics, 18, 20220108. https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0108.
34. Merkle, C., & Sextroh, C. J. (2021). Value and momentum from investors’ perspective: Evidence from professionals’ risk-ratings. Journal of Empir-ical Finance, 62, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.03.004.
35. Merton, R. C. (1980). ON ESTIMATING THE EXPECTED RETURN ON THE MARKET An Exploratory Investigation*. In Journal of Finan-cial Economics (Vol. 8). North-Holland Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(80)90007-0.
36. Mohapatra, S., & Misra, A. K. (2020). Momentum returns: A portfolio-based empirical study to establish evidence, factors and profitability in Indi-an stock market. IIMB Management Review, 32(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.007.
37. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098.
38. Nain, A., Borha, N. S., Ali, F., Sayal, A., Suri, P., Chauhan, S. S., & Ahmad, V. (2025). Decoding investor sentiments in the Indian stock market: A structural equation modelling approach. F1000Research, 13, 1378. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.156635.2.
39. Park, K., Jung, M., & Fang, Z. (2022). Which is Better: Value Strategy or Growth Strategy? Global Business and Finance Review, 27(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2022.27.1.83.
40. Park, K., Jung, M., & Fang, Z. (2023). The value-growth premium in a time-varying risk return framework. International Review of Economics and Finance, 88, 1500–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.043.
41. PETKOVA, R., & ZHANG, L. (2005). Is value riskier than growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 78(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.001.
42. Pham, Q., Pham, H., Pham, T., & Tiwari, A. K. (2025). Revisiting the role of investor sentiment in the stock market. International Review of Eco-nomics and Finance, 100, 104089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104089.
43. PHILLIPS, P. C. B., & PERRON, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.
44. Piotroski, J. D., & Roulstone, D. T. (2005). Do insider trades reflect both contrarian beliefs and superior knowledge about future cash flow realiza-tions? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.003.
45. Qadan, M., & Aharon, D. Y. (2019). Can investor sentiment predict the size premium? International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.02.005.
46. Qadan, M., & Jacob, M. (2022). The value premium and investors’ appetite for risk. International Review of Economics & Finance, 82, 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.06.014.
47. Qadan, M., Kliger, D., & Chen, N. (2019). Idiosyncratic volatility, the VIX and stock returns. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.06.003.
48. ROLL, R. (1981). A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect. The Journal of Finance, 36(4), 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb04890.x.
49. Rozeff, M. S., & Zaman, M. A. (1998). Overreaction and Insider Trading: Evidence from Growth and Value Portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 53(2), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.275500.
50. Sadhwani, R., & Bhayo, M. U. R. (2021). Momentum and disposition effect in the US stock market. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1999004.
51. Sarwar, G. (2012). Is VIX an investor fear gauge in BRIC equity markets? Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 22(3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2012.01.003.
52. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*. The Jour-nal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x.
53. Vassalou, M., & Xing, Y. (2004). Default Risk in Equity Returns. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 831–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00650.x.
54. Whaley, R. E. (2000). The Investor Fear Gauge. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(3), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2000.319728.
55. Whaley, R. E. (2009). Understanding the VIX. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(3), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2009.35.3.098.
Downloads
How to Cite
Dutta, K., & Singh, K. B. (2025). Market Volatility and Equity Risk Factors: Dynamic Interac‎tions, Implications, and Evidence from India. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 294-302. https://doi.org/10.14419/gg0bsf44
ACM

ACS

APA

ABNT

Chicago

Harvard

IEEE

MLA

Turabian

Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

BibTeX

Market Volatility and Equity Risk Factors: Dynamic Interac‎tions, Implications, and Evidence from India

Authors

Abstract

References

Downloads

How to Cite