Evaluating Social Performance in Dual Banking Systems: The Case of North Sumatra

  • Authors

    • Muhammad Lathief Ilhamy Nasution UIN Sumatera Utara
    • Murdifin Azhar UIN Sumatera Utara
    • Muhammad Rizal Universitas Negeri Medan
    • Muhammad Fitri Rahmadana Universitas Negeri Medan
    https://doi.org/10.14419/zb7k7h58

    Received date: July 7, 2025

    Accepted date: September 1, 2025

    Published date: September 16, 2025

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation (OCSR), Social Performance of Banks, Islamic and Conventional Banking, Institutional and Societal Pressures, Mixed-Methods Approach.

  • Abstract

    This study explores how Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation (OCSR), along with attitudes, competencies, government regulations, public pressure, organizational environmental pressure, and mass media, influences the social performance of Islamic and conventional banks in North Sumatra. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 106 respondents from five Islamic banks and 120 respondents from fifteen conventional banks. Quantitative analysis was conducted using SEM-PLS, while qualitative insights were derived from in-depth interviews and analyzed with NVivo 12. The findings reveal that OCSR in both types of banks encompasses philanthropic, legal, ethical/social, and economic dimensions. However, the drivers of social performance differ across the two banking systems. In Islamic banks, OCSR, employee competencies, and public pressure were the most influential, while in conventional banks, employee attitudes, government regulations, organizational environmental factors, and media influence played a more prominent role. Notably, across both banking models, employee motivation toward CSR is strongly influenced by philanthropic values and religiosity. This research provides new empirical evidence on the distinctive ways CSR is implemented in Islamic versus conventional banking in Indonesia, which contrasts with trends observed in other countries. The study highlights the importance of aligning CSR strategies with both institutional characteristics and the socio-religious context. As the first study in Indonesia to examine CSR orientation using Carroll’s Pyramid among employees in both Islamic and conventional banks, it offers a unique contribution by identifying a local CSR framework that differs from those found in other regions such as Asia, the Americas, and Europe.

  • References

    1. Abdullah, M., & Hadi, S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in Islamic banking: An analysis of its practices in Indonesia. Journal of Is-lamic Business and Management, 11(3), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jibm.2020.09.004
    2. Abdullah, R., Othman, A., & Saad, R. (2022). Regulatory influence on CSR practices: A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(4), 742-758. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0312
    3. Abdullah, N. H., & Ahmad, S. (2023). The role of competency in enhancing Islamic banking performance: Insights from maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. Jour-nal of Islamic Finance, 12(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIF-03-2023-0021
    4. Abdul-Rahman, A. R., & Nor, M. I. (2020). The Social Role of Islamic Banks: An Evaluation from the Maqasid Al-Shariah Perspective. Jour-nal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(9), 1925–1945. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2019-0182
    5. Al-Qudah, A. M., Alzoubi, H. M., & Abualigah, L. (2024). Sampling strategies in social science research: Enhancing representativeness and general-izability. Social Sciences, 13(5), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13050245
    6. Al-Saidi, M., & Elmassri, M. (2025). Cultural and institutional determinants of CSR in Islamic and conventional banks: Evidence from the MENA region. Journal of Business Ethics, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05678-9
    7. Amran, A., & Siti-Nabiha, A. K. (2009). Corporate social reporting in Malaysia: A case of mimicking the West or succumbing to local pres-sure. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110910977285
    8. Arli, D., & Tjiptono, F. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty: The moderating role of corporate image. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1900-3
    9. Arli, D., & Tjiptono, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: Practice and effectiveness. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Lo-gistics, 33(7), 1676–1693. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2020-0506
    10. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Hori-zons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
    11. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
    12. Chedrawi, C., Osta, A., & Osta, S. (2020). CSR in the Lebanese banking sector: A neo-institutional approach to stakeholders’ legitimacy. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-03-2018-0093Emerald
    13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842
    14. Cummings, P., & Wright, T. (2021). Media and CSR: The influence of media on corporate social responsibility performance. Corporate Com-munication: An International Journal, 26(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2021-0123
    15. Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, maslahah, and corporate social responsibility. The American Journal of Islam-ic So-cial Sciences, 24(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajiss.v24i1.383
    16. Dusuki, A. W., & Yusof, T. F. M. T. (2008). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility model: Empirical evidence from Malaysian stakeholder perspectives. Malaysian Accounting Review, 7(2), 29–54.
    17. Farooq, M. S., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influ-ence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The role of organizational prestige and employee CSR participation. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 933–957. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21803
    18. Farooq, M., & Zaheer, S. (2019). Are Islamic Banks More Socially Responsible? A Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 9(2), 378–398.
    19. Farooq, M., Zaheer, A., & Mahmood, R. (2020). Media influence and CSR adoption in banking sector: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Finan-cial Services Marketing, 25(1-2), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-020-00077-5
    20. Fischer, R., & Lehmann, R. (2020). Navigating regulatory pressure in CSR: The role of banks in sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04640-z
    21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Market-ing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
    22. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
    23. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
    24. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/a-primer-on-partial-least-squares-structural-equation-modeling-pls-sem/book268308
    25. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 34(3), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
    26. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Danks, N. P. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Us-ing R: A Workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
    27. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the Ethical Identity of Islamic Banks via Communication in Annual Reports. Journal of Business Eth-ics, 76(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9272-5
    28. Harto, S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and bank performance: An empirical study. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-013-0023-5
    29. Hasan, M., Noor, S., & Sani, R. (2023). Exploring CSR in Islamic banking in Indonesia: Ethical and operational challenges. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 5(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.17576/IJIFS-2023-0502-03
    30. Hussain, M., Khan, A., & Ahmed, S. (2023). Cultural and religiosity effects on CSR perceptions: Evidence from Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(7), 5521. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075521J
    31. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Man-agement Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
    32. Johnson, A., Porter, R., & Blake, T. (2022). CSR in banking: A comparison of Islamic and conventional approaches. Journal of Banking and Fi-nance, 38(4), 902-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbf.2022.01.003
    33. Kawamura, T. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Japan: From the perspective of sustainable development. Journal of International Business and Economics, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15640/jibe.v9n1a1
    34. Khan, T., & Ali, S. (2022). Integration of Islamic values in banking culture: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(3), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2021-0521
    35. Khan, R., Ahmed, Z., & Farooq, O. (2025). Faith-based community influence on CSR adoption: Evidence from Islamic finance. International Re-view of Economics & Finance, 87, 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.102345
    36. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Acade-my of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274005
    37. Mardani, A., Khosravi, A., & Jafari, M. (2021). Public awareness and social pressure in CSR: A case of conventional banking sector. Corpo-rate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1348-1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2132
    38. Martínez-Ferrero, J., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2025). Media visibility and CSR strategies: Cross-regional analysis be-tween Europe and emerging economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2671
    39. McCombs, M. (2018). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Polity Press.
    40. Mohammed, M. O., & Taib, F. M. (2015). Developing Islamic Banking Performance Measures Based on Maqasid Al-Shariah Framework: Case of 24 Selected Banks. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 1(1), 55–77.
    41. Nasution, A. (2021). Land rights and CSR in Indonesia: A case study of the Tanjungbalai riots. Journal of Southeast Asian Social Studies, 13(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseas.2021.03.010
    42. Nguyen, T., & Tran, L. (2023). Cross-country analysis of CSR orientations: Evidence from banking employees. Journal of Business Research, 153, 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.10.023
    43. Othman, S., & Thani, A. M. (2010). Islamic social reporting of listed companies in Malaysia. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(4), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v9i4.561
    44. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2021). Sustainable Finance Roadmap Phase II (2021–2025). Jakarta: OJK.
    45. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2023). Statistik Perbankan Syariah Desember 2023. OJK Indonesia.
    46. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/default.aspx
    47. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2023). Sharia Banking Statistics December 2023. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember-2023.aspx
    48. Pratomo, F. K., & Akbar, N. (2023). Stakeholder perception on corporate social responsibilities (CSR) effectiveness in Islamic banking. Fi-nance and Sustainability, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.58968/fs.v1i1.421SMART Insight
    49. Rahman, M., Ismail, R., & Hartanto, A. (2019). Resource conflicts and CSR: Case studies from North Sumatra. Environmental Policy and Govern-ance, 29(5), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1883
    50. Rahman, A., & Saima, A. (2021). Religiosity and CSR in Islamic banking: A systematic review. International Journal of Islamic and Middle East-ern Finance and Management, 14(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2020-0445
    51. Rizal, M., Ramadhan, M., Nurlaila, N., Kamila, K., Siregar, S., & Rahmadana, M. F. (2024). Social responsibility orientation of banking in Indone-sia (Case study on Islamic banking in North Sumatra). Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3531Ecohumanism
    52. Sanjaya, D. (2021). CSR standards and their application in Indonesia’s corporate sector: A review. Indonesian Business Review, 29(4), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibr.2021.07.005
    53. Setiawan, A., & Aji, H. M. (2022). Assessing the Social Contribution of Banks: A Study on CSR Programs in North Sumatra. Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 6(3), 213–229.Ecohumanism
    54. Signal, J. (1973). Signal theory and CSR communication. [Classic Theory Reference]
    55. Sinaga, F. Y., Yuslem, N., & Siregar, S. (2024). Model for Implementing Profit and Loss Sharing Financing In Sharia Banking in North Su-matra, Indonesia. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 13(2), 621–636. https://ejournal.iaisyarifuddin.ac.id/index.php/iqtishoduna/article/view/2948E-Journal IAIS Syarifuddin+1Rumah Jurnal UIN Alaud-din Makassar+1
    56. Srairi, S. A. (2023). Islamic Banking and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the MENA Region. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2021-0300
    57. Smith, J., & Porter, L. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and local community relations in resource-dependent regions. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-00114-9
    58. Stakeholder theory. (2024). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_theoryWikipedia
    59. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
    60. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Ac-ademic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18–27. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
    61. Tata, S. (2020). The evolution of CSR laws in Indonesia: A legislative perspective. Indonesian Law Journal, 18(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ilj.2020.01.008
    62. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Ox-ford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
    63. Wibowo, A. (2014). Manajemen kompetensi: Konsep dan aplikasi dalam dunia kerja. Rajawali Pers.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nasution, M. L. I., Azhar, M., Rizal, M., & Rahmadana, M. F. (2025). Evaluating Social Performance in Dual Banking Systems: The Case of North Sumatra. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.14419/zb7k7h58