Environmental Accounting I ‎Manufacturing:‎A Large VS. SME Analysis

  • Authors

    • Rusdiah Hasanuddin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YPUP, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    • Nurasia Natsir Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Yappi Makassar, Sout Sulawesi
    https://doi.org/10.14419/v1tq5447

    Received date: June 18, 2025

    Accepted date: August 7, 2025

    Published date: August 25, 2025

  • Environmental Accounting; Manufacturing Sector; Large Enterprises; SMEs; Digital Transformation; ESG Reporting; Geographic Context

  • Abstract

    Purpose -- This study aims to investigate the disparities in environmental accounting practices between large enterprises and Small and ‎Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector, examining how organisational size influences adoption patterns, implementation ‎challenges, and overall effectiveness across diverse geographic contexts.‎

    Design/methodology/approach -- The research employs a mixed-methods approach, analyzing data from 187 manufacturing companies ‎‎(93 large enterprises and 94 SMEs) across diverse geographic regions spanning Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America over the period ‎‎2018-2023. Primary data were collected through structured surveys and semi-structured interviews with key management personnel, while ‎secondary data were obtained from sustainability reports, annual financial statements, and regulatory filings. The study employs multiple ‎regression analysis (R² = 0.742, p < 0.001), structural equation modelling, and thematic content analysis to investigate the relationships ‎between variables.‎

    Findings -- Results reveal significant disparities in environmental accounting practices between large enterprises and SMEs. Large ‎enterprises demonstrate more sophisticated systems, comprehensive reporting, and strategic integration of environmental accounting into ‎decision-making processes, driven by greater resource availability and stronger stakeholder pressures. The relationship between ‎environmental accounting implementation and financial performance shows differential impacts based on organizational size (β = 0.618, p < ‎‎0.001 for large enterprises; β = 0.234, p < 0.05 for SMEs). Geographic contexts significantly moderate these relationships, with Asian ‎markets showing higher compliance-driven adoption while European markets demonstrate innovation-oriented approaches.‎

    Originality/value -- This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive comparative analysis integrating recent ‎developments in digital transformation and ESG reporting frameworks. The findings offer specific policy recommendations, including tiered ‎regulatory frameworks, digital platform sharing initiatives, and capacity-building programs tailored to organizational size and geographic ‎context‎.

  • References

    1. Abdullah, N. H. N. (2022). The Role and Implications of Big Data on Strategic Management Accounting Practices: A Case Study in a Malaysian Manufacturing Company. Management and Accounting Review, 21(1), 41–60. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128299871&origin=inward. https://doi.org/10.24191/MAR.V21i01-03.
    2. Aarons, J., & Aarons, G. A. (2021). Sustainability accounting and reporting: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126447.
    3. Anderson, M., Schmidt, K., & Liu, J. (2023). ESG reporting transformation: Digital technologies and regulatory compliance in European manufac-turing. Journal of Environmental Reporting, 45(3), 234-251.
    4. Arjalies, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.003.
    5. Astuty, W. (2023). A Comprehensive Study of Accounting Information Quality as A Mediator Between Management Accounting Practices and Inventory Management in Operations Research for Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 6(2), 270–293.
    6. AI Environmental Solutions. (2025). Generative AI in environmental reporting: 2025 impact assessment. Environmental Technology Quarterly, 8(1), 23-41.
    7. ASEAN Sustainability Report. (2025). Regional harmonization of environmental accounting standards: Implementation and early outcomes. ASEAN Secretariat Publications.
    8. Brown, S., & Johnson, R. (2024). Regional variations in environmental accounting adoption: A North American perspective. Environmental Ac-counting Review, 28(2), 78-94.
    9. Chen, L., & Liu, W. (2024). Digital transformation of environmental accounting: Blockchain applications in carbon tracking. Digital Sustainability, 12(1), 45-62.
    10. Diaz, V. (2021). Review for “A generational perspective of family firms’’ social capital: Interplay between ethical leadership and firm perfor-mance".” Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/BEER.12521/v1/review1.
    11. Digital ESG Consortium. (2025). Integrated technology platforms for environmental accountability: Market analysis and adoption trends. Tech for Sustainability Review, 4(2), 156-173.
    12. European Commission. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive: Implementation guidelines for SMEs. Official Journal of the European Union, L 91/1.
    13. Environmental Tech Review. (2025). AI-driven environmental analytics: Predictive accuracy and implementation challenges. Environmental Tech-nology and Innovation, 15(3), 89-107.
    14. EU Sustainability Observatory. (2025). CSRD implementation year one: Compliance rates and SME support effectiveness. European Commission Directorate-General for Financial Stability.
    15. European Sustainability Agency. (2025). Digital platform subsidies for SME environmental accounting: Impact evaluation report. Official Journal of the European Union, L 45/1.
    16. Farooq, M. B., & De Villiers, C. (2017). The market for sustainability assurance services: A comprehensive literature review and future avenues for research. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(1), 79-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0093.
    17. Foster, P., & Chang, M. (2023). CSRD compliance strategies for multinational corporations: A comparative analysis. Corporate Sustainability Quar-terly, 19(4), 123-140
    18. García, A., & Mueller, H. (2023). Innovation-driven environmental accounting: European best practices and competitive advantage. European Business Review, 35(2), 189-206
    19. [22] Global ESG Technology Report. (2025). Integrated platforms adoption in manufacturing: 2024 market analysis. Sustainable Business Intelli-gence, 7(4), 201-218.
    20. [23] Hussein, M. A. (2024). Accounting For Air Pollution from Manufacturing Industry in Iraq. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 16(1), 531–546.
    21. Kumar, A., Patel, S., & Thompson, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in environmental management accounting: Opportunities and challenges for SMEs. AI and Sustainability, 8(3), 167-184
    22. Lee, K., Tanaka, H., & Nguyen, V. (2024). Environmental accounting in Asia-Pacific manufacturing: Regulatory drivers and cultural influences. Asian Journal of Environmental Accounting, 31(1), 56-73
    23. Li, H. (2024). Risks and preventive measures for manufacturing enterprises in the Context of cloud accounting. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00399.
    24. Martinez, C., Rodriguez, F., & Silva, M. (2024). Blockchain-based carbon tracking systems: Implementation challenges and opportunities. Block-chain and Environment, 6(2), 98-115
    25. Martinez, J., & Johnson, K. (2025). Stakeholder expectations evolution: Post-pandemic environmental accountability demands. Corporate Govern-ance International, 19(2), 67-84.
    26. Morshidi, I. (2021). Management accounting practices in export-oriented manufacturing small and medium enterprises in Malaysia. Contributions to Management Science, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66245-5_4.
    27. Mukwarami, S. (2023). Environmental Management Accounting Implementation Challenges and Supply Chain Management in Emerging Econo-mies’ Manufacturing Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021061.
    28. Nahar, A. (2023). Analysis of the driving aspects of Indonesian manufacturing companies in the basic and chemical industries in carrying out ac-counting conservatism. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2706. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120503.
    29. Nguyen, T. H. (2022). Factors affecting the implementation of environmental management accounting: A case study of pulp and paper manufactur-ing enterprises in Vietnam. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2141089.
    30. North American Environmental Compliance Review. (2025). Fragmented regulatory landscapes: Multi-state manufacturer compliance challenges. Environmental Law Quarterly, 41(1), 134-152.
    31. Ogundipe, L. O. (2024). Management Accounting Practices and Market Value of Selected Manufacturing Firms in Lagos, Nigeria. Springer Pro-ceedings in Business and Economics, 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46177-4_35.
    32. Pramono, A. J. (2023). Sustainability Management Accounting in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Performance Auditing in the Manufacturing Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310082.
    33. Pumiviset, W. (2024). Sustainability and strategic management accounting: evidence of green manufacturing in Thailand. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2302794.
    34. Rawdhan, A. A. R. (2024). Strategic Management Accounting in Australian Manufacturing Firms - A Study of Tools and Techniques for Efficien-cy Improvement in the Current Fourth Industrial Revolution Context. International Journal for Quality Research, 18(3), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR18.03-04.
    35. Rodriguez, M., Kim, S., & Anderson, P. (2023). Digital maturity and environmental accounting sophistication: A global manufacturing study. In-ternational Environmental Accounting, 41(4), 278-295
    36. Robertson, E. R. A. (2024). Quantification and assessment of carbon footprint and accounting in petrochemical manufacturing process. AIP Con-ference Proceedings, 3199(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218102.
    37. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024). Climate disclosure rules: Final implementation and industry investment analysis. SEC Public Compa-ny Accounting Oversight Board.
    38. Smart Manufacturing Journal. (2025). IoT-enabled environmental monitoring: Real-time compliance and automated reporting systems. Industry 4.0 Technology Review, 12(1), 78-95.
    39. Singh, A. (2022). Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) of Enablers Affecting Green Accounting in Indian Manufacturing Sector: A Conceptual Model. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 21(2), 763–767. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2022.v21i02.039.
    40. Taylor, J., & Davis, L. (2023). Machine learning applications in predictive environmental impact modeling. Environmental Technology and Man-agement, 22(3), 145-162.
    41. Thompson, R., & Williams, K. (2024). Stakeholder expectations and ESG reporting evolution: A longitudinal analysis. Stakeholder Governance Re-view, 17(1), 34-51
    42. Terdpaopong, K. (2021). Management accounting practices in Thailand: Case study of manufacturing companies. Contributions to Management Science, 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66245-5_6.
    43. Tsai, W. H. (2024). Advancing Decarbonization Efforts in the Glass Manufacturing Industry through Mathematical Optimization and Management Accounting. Processes, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061078.
    44. Wang, J. (2024). ESG Performance, Firm Heterogeneity, and the Speed of Dynamic Adjustment of Capital Structure: Evidence from China. Ad-vances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 91(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/91/20241063.
    45. Wang, X. (2022). Evaluation Of Environmental Accounting Information Disclosure Level of Manufacturing Industry in A Low-Carbon Economy Environment. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 23(1), 389–400. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126846143&origin=inward.
    46. Widiatmoko, J. (2023). Accounting Conservatism: Antecedents and Consequence in Indonesia Manufacturing Companies. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 2315–2325. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.199.
    47. Wilson, A., & Park, J. (2024). SME environmental accounting barriers: Resource constraints and digital solutions. Small Business Environmental Management, 15(2), 89-106.
    48. Yamamoto, T., & Singh, R. (2024). Geographic context and environmental accounting adoption: A multi-country analysis. Global Environmental Accounting, 29(3), 201-218

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Hasanuddin , R. ., & Natsir, N. (2025). Environmental Accounting I ‎Manufacturing:‎A Large VS. SME Analysis. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(4), 658-667. https://doi.org/10.14419/v1tq5447