The Impact of Countries' Institutional Characteristics on Bank Performance

  • Authors

    • Cihan Ozbek The Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Gebze Technical University, 41400 Kocaeli, Turkiye
    • Prof.Dr. Gokhan Ozer The Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Gebze Technical University, 41400 Kocaeli, Turkiye and Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kyrgyz Turkish Manas University, Chyngyz Aitmatov Campus (Djal), Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3255-998X
    • Dr. Sezai Tunca Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Alanya University, 07400, Alanya, Antalya, Turkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9404-9005
    • Dr. Yavuz Selim Balcioglu Management Information System Department, Faculty of Management, Dogus University, Dudullu, Istanbul, Turkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7138-2972
    https://doi.org/10.14419/dh212w25

    Received date: June 10, 2025

    Accepted date: July 11, 2025

    Published date: July 13, 2025

  • Institutional Characteristics; Banking Performance, Governance Indicators, Financial Development, Panel Data Analysis

  • Abstract

    This study examines the relationship between national institutional quality and banking sector performance using a comprehensive panel dataset of 448 bank-year observations across 28 countries during 2010-2020. Employing multiple econometric approaches, including fixed effects, random effects, and instrumental variable estimation, we investigate how six dimensions of institutional quality from the World Governance Indicators influence key banking performance measures, including profitability, efficiency, stability, and risk management. The empirical results demonstrate robust positive relationships between institutional quality and banking performance across all specifications. Rule of Law emerges as the most influential institutional dimension, with a one standard improvement corresponding to 0.52 percentage point increases in Return on Assets and 2.84 percentage point reductions in Non-Performing Loans Ratios. The analysis reveals that institutional effects operate through distinct transmission mechanisms, with Rule of Law primarily affecting credit risk outcomes, Government Effectiveness influencing capital adequacy measures, and Control of Corruption enhancing operational efficiency. Institutional effects exhibit significant heterogeneity across development levels and periods. Developing countries demonstrate institutional effect magnitudes approximately four times larger than developed economies, while crisis periods show effects 40 percent stronger than normal periods. Moving from the 25th to the 75th percentile of institutional quality corresponds to nearly one percentage point improvement in Return on Assets, representing economically meaningful enhancements in the banking sector performance. The findings have important policy implications for financial sector development strategies. The results suggest that institutional development should constitute a primary priority for countries seeking to strengthen their banking sectors, with legal framework improvements yielding particularly high returns. The differential effects across development contexts indicate that governance reforms may provide especially valuable benefits in developing countries, where institutional constraints bind more tightly on financial sector performance.

  • References

    1. Adem, M. (2022). Impact of income diversification on bank stability: a cross-country analysis. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-03-2022-0093
    2. Alshukri, T., Ojekemi, O. S., Öz, T., & Alzubi, A. (2025). Harnessing digital transformation for sustainable performance: Exploring the mediating roles of green knowledge acquisition and innovation performance under digital transformational leadership. Sustainability, 17(5), 2285.
    3. arisitz, S., & Lahnsteiner, M. (2020). Banking sector stability and reform in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Focus on European Economic Integra-tion, Q2/20, 54–75.
    4. ASUENE. (2024). Banking on sustainability: ESG trends shaping the financial sector in 2024. Retrieved from https://asuene.com/us/blog/banking-on-sustainability-esg-trends-shaping-the-financial-sector-in-2024
    5. Athar, H. M., & Chughtai, S. (2021). Impact of Bank-Specific, Corporate Governance and Environmental Factors on Bank Efficiency and Profita-bility in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Studies, 5(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.34260/jaebs.525
    6. Athari, S. A., Irani, F., & Hadood, A. A. (2023). Country risk factors and banking sector stability: Do countries’ income and risk-level matter? Evi-dence from global study. Heliyon, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20398
    7. Beck, T., De Jonghe, O., & Schepens, G. (2013). Bank competition and stability: Cross-country heterogeneity. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(2), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2012.07.001
    8. Berggren, N., Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). The growth effects of institutional instability. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137411000488
    9. Bermpei, T., Kalyvas, A. N., & Nguyen, T. C. (2018). Does institutional quality condition the effect of bank regulations and supervision on bank stability? Evidence from emerging and developing economies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 59, 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.06.002
    10. Bouattour, A., Kalai, M., & Helali, K. (2024). The non-linear relationship between ESG performance and bank stability in the digital era: New evi-dence from a regime-switching approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1445.
    11. Buallay, A., Fadel, S. M., Al-Ajmi, J. Y., & Saudagaran, S. (2024). ESG and asset quality in the banking industry: The moderating role of financial performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102138.
    12. Çam, İ., & Özer, G. (2021). Institutional quality and corporate financing decisions around the world. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 57, 101401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101401
    13. Deloitte. (2024). 2025 banking industry outlook. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/financial-services-industry-outlooks/banking-industry-outlook.html
    14. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (2002). Does deposit insurance increase banking system stability? An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(7), 1373–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00171-X
    15. Diab, A., Marie, M., Elgharbawy, A., & Elbendary, I. (2023). The effect of political risk and corporate governance on bank stability in the MENA region: Did the Arab Spring uprisings matter? Cogent Business & Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2174207
    16. Dinçer, N. N., & Neyaptı, B. (2008). WHAT DETERMINES THE “LEGAL” QUALITY Of BANK REGULATION AND SUPERVISION? Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(4), 607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00117.x
    17. Djalilov, K., & Piesse, J. (2016). Determinants of bank profitability in transition countries: What matters most? Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.03.015
    18. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.004
    19. Fernández, A., & Tamayo, C. E. (2015). FROM INSTITUTIONS TO FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH: WHAT ARE THE LINKS? Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12132
    20. Gao, X. (2023). Digital transformation in finance and its role in promoting financial transparency. Global Finance Journal, 58, 100903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100903
    21. Jia, K., & Liu, X. (2024). Bank digital transformation, bank competitiveness and systemic risk. Frontiers in Physics, 11, 1297912.
    22. Karadas, S., & Ozdemir, N. (2023). Does Public Corruption Affect Bank Failures? Evidence from the United States. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(10), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16100451
    23. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x
    24. Nguyen, C. P., Schınckus, C., Su, T. D., & Chong, F. H. L. (2021). Institutional quality and risk in the banking system. Journal of Economics Fi-nance and Administrative Science, 26(51), 22. https://doi.org/10.1108/jefas-01-2020-0012
    25. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
    26. Oliver Wyman. (2024). Navigating ESG compliance to champion in sustainable banking. Retrieved from https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2024/apr/esg-compliance-european-banks-risk-management-playbook.html
    27. Owoundi, J.-P. F., Mbassi, C. M., & Owoundi, F. (2021). Does inflation targeting weaken financial stability? Assessing the role of institutional quality. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2021.03.003
    28. Ozili, P. K. (2019). Bank income is smoothing, institutions and corruption. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.009
    29. Saif-Alyousfi, A. Y. H., Saha, A., & Md-Rus, R. (2024). Bank diversification and ESG activities: A global perspective. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104719.
    30. Sebastian, I. M., Woerner, S. L., & Weill, P. (2025). Platform-enabled business transformation at ANZ Institutional. MIT CISR Research Briefing, XXV-6.
    31. Skadden. (2025). ESG: A review of 2024 and key trends to look for in 2025. Retrieved from https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/01/esg-a-review-of-2024-and-key-trends-to-look-for-in-2025
    32. Wang, R., & Sui, Y. (2019). Political institutions and foreign banks’ risk-taking in emerging markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Manage-ment, 51, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.07.001
    33. World Bank. (2020). Global financial development report 2019/2020: Bank regulation and supervision a decade after the global financial crisis. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-7
    34. World Bank. (2024). Digital transformation overview: Development news, research, data. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digital/overview
    35. Yan, L., & Garrido, J. A. (2022). Keeping Pace with Change: Fintech and the Evolution of Commercial Law. Fintech Notes, 2022(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616358754.063
    36. Zangina, S., & Hassan, S. (2020). THE IMPACT OF RULE OF LAW ON FDI INFLOW: A POOLED MEAN GROUP ANALYSIS OF SE-LECTED SSA COUNTRIES. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 441. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8250

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ozbek , C. ., Ozer , P. G. ., Tunca, D. S. . ., & Balcioglu , D. Y. S. . (2025). The Impact of Countries’ Institutional Characteristics on Bank Performance. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(3), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.14419/dh212w25