Modelling young consumers' awareness and purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: A PLS-SEM approach

  • Authors

    • Muzammil A Ph.D. (IFT) Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, School of Social Science and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore
    • Dr. Vijayaraj K Assistant Professor (Sr) & Research Supervisor, Department of Commerce, School of Social Science and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore
    https://doi.org/10.14419/zs6dzj66

    Received date: May 9, 2025

    Accepted date: May 29, 2025

    Published date: June 7, 2025

  • Eco-friendly behavior; Green purchase intention; Environmental knowledge; Social influence; Product accessibility; Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).

  • Abstract

    As global concern for environmental sustainability intensifies, understanding the drivers of eco-friendly consumer behavior, particularly among youth, has become increasingly important. Despite rising awareness, a persistent gap exists between green purchase intentions and actual behavior, especially in developing economies like India. This study investigates this gap by extending the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to include three additional constructs: environmental knowledge, social influence, and product accessibility. Green purchase intention is modelled as a mediating variable. Data were collected through a structured survey of 130 Indian college students, and the hypothesized model was tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4. The results reveal that all three antecedents significantly influence green purchase intention, which in turn is a strong predictor of eco-friendly purchasing behavior. Moreover, green purchase intention partially mediates the relationship between the antecedents and behavior. Theoretically, this research advances the TPB by integrating context-relevant predictors within a PLS-SEM framework. Practically, the study offers actionable insights for marketers, educators, and policymakers aiming to foster sustainable consumer practices among younger populations—particularly through targeted education, peer-driven campaigns, and improved green product accessibility.

     

  • References

    1. Ahmed, A., & Paramasivam, R. (2024). Determinants of eco-friendly purchase behaviour in emerging markets: A structural equation modelling ap-proach. Journal of Environmental Management, 350, 119804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.119804.
    2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-Tsss
    3. Basheer, M. F., & Paramasivam, R. (2024). The mediating role of green trust in sustainable consumption among Indian youth. Sustainability, 16(1), 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010565
    4. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business re-search (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    5. Chaudhary, R., & Bais, B. (2018). The impact of green marketing on consumer purchase intention: Evidence from India. International Journal of Management Studies, 5(3), 52–59.
    6. Chang-Ho Yang, C., Lee, S. H., & Lin, M. H. (2024). Predicting sustainable food consumption using extended theory of planned behaviour. Jour-nal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103444
    7. Chughtai, M. A., & Awan, H. M. (2020). Green marketing orientation and green purchase intention: Mediating role of green brand awareness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 123013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123013
    8. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
    9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980JSTOR+2SCIRP+2Wikipedia+2
    10. Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003.
    11. Gupta, A., Verma, S., & Singh, R. (2024). Drivers of green consumer behaviour among Indian millennials: An empirical study using structural equa-tion modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 139812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.139812
    12. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
    13. Hussain, D. (2020). Understanding eco-conscious behaviour: Evidence from the Indian FMCG sector. International Journal of Green Economics, 14(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2020.10029012
    14. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation model-ing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8ResearchGate+4UT Research In-fo+4Wikipedia – Die freie Enzyklopädie+4
    15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7SCIRP+1SpringerLink+1
    16. Iravani, M. R., Zare Bidaki, M., & Shojaei, M. (2012). Study of effective factors on green purchase behavior in Iran. World Applied Sciences Jour-nal, 17(5), 571–578.
    17. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401.
    18. Lacroix, K., & Gifford, R. (2018). Psychological barriers to energy conservation behavior: The role of worldviews and climate change risk percep-tion. Environment and Behavior, 50(7), 749–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517715296.
    19. Meshictra, P., & Sellamuthu, P. (2024). Green awareness and buying behavior among college students in India. Indian Journal of Marketing Re-search, 49(2), 41–49.
    20. Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2021). The influence of situational constraints on the green consumption of Vietnamese consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102478.
    21. Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Re-tailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006.
    22. Ranjbarshamsi, H., Rezaei, S., & Latifi, A. (2022). A comprehensive model of green consumer behavior in emerging markets. Sustainability, 14(9), 11334. https://doi.org/10.3390/su140911334.
    23. Rathina Velu Kayalvily. (2022). Role of eco-labels in influencing green product purchase intention among millennials. Asian Journal of Business Ethics and Sustainability, 8(1), 18–27.
    24. Risyafani, M., Fitriani, N., & Salamah, F. (2024). Investigating environmental values and green purchase behaviour among Indonesian youth. Envi-ronment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03045-1
    25. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling (pp. 1–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_1
    26. Sker, M., & Sesen, H. (2019). Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the mediating role of green self-identity. Business Strategy and the En-vironment, 28(4), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2261
    27. Shahrukh, M. (2023). Assessing sustainable consumer attitudes in metropolitan India. Asian Journal of Sustainability, 12(1), 33–47.
    28. Suki, N. M. (2016). Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brand, attitude, and knowledge. British Food Journal, 118(12), 2893–2910. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0295.
    29. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007.
    30. White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding frame-work. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649.
    31. Yang, C. H., Paramasivam, R., & Ahmed, A. (2024). Young consumers' green product attitudes in India: A structural model analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12789
    32. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    A, M., & K , D. V. . (2025). Modelling young consumers’ awareness and purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.14419/zs6dzj66