Development of new optimal cloud computing mechanism for data exchange based on link selectivity, link reliability and data exchange efficiency

  • Authors

    • K. Shirisha Reddy
    • M. Balaraju
    • Ramananaik .
    2017-12-28
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.2.9066
  • Quality of Service, Virtual Machine, Cloud, Distributed Computing.

  • Reorganization of virtual machines (VM) presents an extraordinary opportunity for parallel, cluster, grid, cloud and distributed computing. Virtualization technology benefits the computing and IT ventures by enabling clients to share expensive by multiplexing virtual machines on a similar arrangement of hardware hosts. With the advantage of higher data-accessing feature, this data sharing approach provides challenges in perceptive to data security and data integrity issues. In this paper, to the selected network, a service level agreement approach for data access resource management is developed. During the exchange of packets over the selected link, it is required that data are to be accessed at a faster rate. The overhead may have serious negative effects on cluster utilization, throughput, and Quality of Service issues. Therefore, the challenge is to develop VMs a control approach, which governs the rate allocation in terms of data access and bandwidth to speed the data exchange performance. The throughput of the network is monitored by the traffic link rate, wherein the processing overhead is observed at the process of quality.

  • References

    1. [1] Bobroff, N., Kochut, A., & Beaty, K. (2007). Dynamic placement of virtual machines for managing sla violations. In Integrated Network Management, 2007. IM'07. 10th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 119-128). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INM.2007.374776.

      [2] Kochut, A., & Beaty, K. (2007). On strategies for dynamic resource management in virtualized server environments. In Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2007. MASCOTS'07. 15th International Symposium on (pp. 193-200). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2007.45.

      [3] Khanna, G., Beaty, K., Kar, G., & Kochut, A. (2006). Application performance management in virtualized server environments. In Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2006. NOMS 2006. 10th IEEE/IFIP (pp. 373-381). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2006.1687567.

      [4] Wood T, Shenoy PJ, Venkataramani A, Yousif MS (2007) Black-box and graybox strategies for virtual machine migration. In: NSDI Vol. 7, pp 17–17.

      [5] Verma, A., Ahuja, P., & Neogi, A. (2008). pMapper: power and migration cost aware application placement in virtualized systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware (pp. 243-264). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89856-6_13.

      [6] Cardosa, M., Korupolu, M. R., & Singh, A. (2009). Shares and utilities base power consolidation in virtualized server environments. In Integrated Network Management, 2009. IM'09. IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 327-334). IEEE

      [7] Speitkamp B, Bichler M (2010) A mathematical programming approach for server consolidation problems in virtualized data centers. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 3(4):266–278 https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2010.25.

      [8] Stillwell M, Schanzenbach D, Vivien F, Casanova H (2010) Resource allocation algorithms for virtualized service hosting platforms. J Parallel Distributed Comput 70(9):962–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2010.05.006.

      [9] Panigrahy, R., Talwar, K., Uyeda, L., & Wieder, U. (2011). Heuristics for vector bin packing. Research. Microsoft. Com

      [10] Kou LT, Markowsky G (1977) Multidimensional bin packing algorithms. IBM J Res Dev 21(5):443–448. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.215.0443.

      [11] Frenk H, Csirik J, Labbé M, Zhang S (1990) on the multidimensional vector bin packing. University of Szeged. Acta Cybernetica, pp 361–369.

      [12] Yue M (1991) A simple proof of the inequality FFD (L) ≤ 11/9 OPT (L) + 1, ∀ L for the FFD bin-packing algorithm. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica (English Series) 7(4):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02009683.

      [13] Dósa G (2007) the tight bound of first fit decreasing bin-packing algorithm is FFD (I) ≤ 11/9OPT (I) + 6/9. In: Combinatorics, algorithms, probabilistic and experimental methodologies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74450-4_1.

      [14] Kao, M. Y. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of algorithms. Springer Science & Business Media. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27848-8.

      [15] Gmach, D., Rolia, J., Cherkasova, L., Belrose, G., Turicchi, T., & Kemper, A. (2008). An integrated approach to resource pool management: Policies, efficiency and quality metrics. In Dependable Systems and Networks with FTCS and DCC, 2008. DSN 2008. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 326-335). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2008.4630101.

      [16] Keller, G., Tighe, M., Lutfiyya, H., & Bauer, M. (2012). An analysis of first fitheuristics for the virtual machine relocation problem. In Network and service management (cnsm), 2012 8th international conference and 2012 workshop on systems virtualiztion management (svm) (pp. 406-413). IEEE

      [17] Beloglazov A, Buyya R (2012) optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers. Concurrency Comput 24(13):1397–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.1867.

      [18] Foster, G., Keller, G., Tighe, M., Lutfiyya, H., & Bauer, M. (2013). The right tool for the job: Switching data centre management strategies at runtime. In Integrated Network Management (IM 2013), 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 151-159). IEEE.

      [19] Xiao Z, Song W, Chen Q (2013) Dynamic resource allocation using virtual machines for cloud computing environment. IEEE Trans Parallel Distributed Syst 24(6):1107–1117 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2012.283.

      [20] Ferdaus, M. H. (2016). Multi-objective virtual machine Management in Cloud Data Centers (Doctoral dissertation, Monash University)

      [21] Tighe, M., Keller, G., Shamy, J., Bauer, M., & Lutfiyya, H. (2013). Towards an improved data centre simulation with DCSim. In Network and Servicc Management (CNSM), 2013 9th International Conference on (pp. 364-372). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CNSM.2013.6727859.

      [22] Tighe, M., Keller, G., Bauer, M., & Lutfiyya, H. (2012). DCSim: A data centre simulation tool for evaluating dynamic virtualized resource management. In Network and service management (cnsm), 2012 8th international conference and 2012 workshop on systems virtualiztion management (svm) (pp. 385-392). IEEE.

      [23] Foster, G. (2013). UTIL-DSS: utilization-based dynamic strategy switching for improvement in data Centre operation (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario)

      [24] (2014) SPECpower ssj2008. Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Available on: https://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/. Accessed 7 July 2017.

      [25] (2014) the Internet Traffic Archive. Available on: http://ita.ee.lbl.gov/. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Reddy, K. S., Balaraju, M., & ., R. (2017). Development of new optimal cloud computing mechanism for data exchange based on link selectivity, link reliability and data exchange efficiency. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(1.2), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.2.9066