Flexible Work Arrangements Availability and their Relationship with Work- Family- Conflict: The Moderating Effect of Employment Nature and Job Status

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    The present study has explored the moderating effects of employment nature and job status on the relation between Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs) and Work-Family-Conflict (WFC). Cross-sectional survey research design has been used and a structured self-administered survey questionnaire used to collect data from 330 employees working on private and public organizations in Bangladesh. Different statistical measures such as descriptive statistics, zero order correlation, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) multiple regression analysis, interaction regression and F-test for model fit were used to explore research observations and statistical verification of findings. The findings of this research is FWA is negatively related with WFC {B= -0.408, t (2.311) =-5.07, p<.000} and also cause to reduce WFC (β= - 0.283). On the other hand, employment nature and job status have moderating effect on FWAs and WFC. The most consistent finding in this regard suggests that FWAs is a more powerful mechanism for private organization employees with greater job responsibilities than employees (with less responsibility at work) in government organizations.



  • Keywords

    Employment Nature, Flexible Work Arrangements, Flexible Policies, Job Status and Work-Family-Conflict.

  • References

      [1] Allen, T. D., & Shockley, K. (2006). Flexible work arrangements: Help or hype? Paper presented at the Families and Health Conference, Provo, Utah.

      [2] Allen, T.D., & Shockley, K.M. (2009). Flexible work arrangements: Help or hype? In D.R. Crane & E. J. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of Families and Work: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 265–284.

      [3] Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility, the study of people at work. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345-376. doi: 10.1111/peps.12012

      [4] Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practice: Links to work–family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 173, 1–24.

      [5] Coakes, S.J., & Steed, L.G. (2001). SPSS: Analysis without anguish. Sydney, Australia: John Wiley

      & Sons.

      [6] Davis, D.D., & Polonko, K.A. (2001). Telework in the United States: Telework America Survey 2001. http://www.workingfromanywhere.org/telework/twa2001.htm.

      [7] Dunham, R.B., Pierce, J.L., & Castaneda, M.B. (1987). Alternative work schedules: Two field quasi-experiments. Personal Psychology, 40, 215 242.

      [8] Edwards, J.R., & Rothbard, N.P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 179–199.

      [9] Frone, M.R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M.L. (1992). Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(7), 723–729.

      [10] Frone, M.R., Yardley, J.K., & Markel, K.S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work-family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 145–167.

      [11] Golden, T.D., (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Teleworking and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 176–187.

      [12] Goodstein, J.D., (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work–family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382.




Article ID: 30085
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v8i1.9.30085

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.