Assessment of University Campus Cycling Facilities: the Students’ Perceptions

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    Cycling can prevent environmental pollution, such as air pollution and noise pollution. The use of motorised mode of transportation in campus will be more exposed to dangers of pollution, such as carbon monoxide. This study aims to measure and identify factors that contribute to students' perceptions and satisfaction levels of cycling facilities. Factors that were studied can further improve the existing facilities. Efficiency and effectiveness can be observed in service quality or facilities provided by relevant parties. This study focuses on male and female students who always cycle in the National University of Malaysia (UKM) and involves the participation of students from Year 1 to Year 4. A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed to these students. From the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) factors, such as cycling lane good surface conditions (sidewalk), clean environment and willingness to cycle should be considered because these factors contribute to customer satisfaction.



  • Keywords

    Cycling; importance-performance analysis (IPA); students’ perception; university campus.

  • References

      [1] Bonham J & Koth B (2010), Universities and the cycling culture. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15, 94–102.

      [2] Dawood SAA & Rahmat RAOK (2015), Factors that affect cycling transportation mode for postgraduate students at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia by logit method. Jurnal Kejuruteraan 27, 1–7.

      [3] Ismail A & Zakaria S (2014), Development of bicycle shift models in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia campus. Jurnal Kejuruteraan 26, 69–75.

      [4] Tolley R (1996), Green campuses: cutting the environmental cost of commuting. Journal of Transport Geography 4, 213–217.

      [5] Jachrizal S, Tjahjono T & Gituri M (2015), Analysis of student perception on infrastructure and willingness to cycle. International Journal of Technology 6, 244–253.

      [6] Pucher J & Buehler R (2008), Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. Transport Reviews 28, 495–528.

      [7] Dawood SAA, Borhan MN & Rahmat RA (2015), Pemodelan kesediaan pelajar beranjak kepada berbasikal di UKM (Modelling of student readiness switch to cycling modes at UKM). Jurnal Kejuruteraan 27, 95–102.

      [8] Martilla JA & James JC (1977), Importance-Performance Analysis. The Journal of Marketing 41(1), 77–79.

      [9] Brandt RD, (2000), An ‘Outside-in’ approach to determining customer driven properties for improvement and innovation. White Paper Series 2(2), 1–8.

      [10] Matzler K, Sauerwein E & Heischmidt K (2003), Importance-Performance Analysis Revisited: The role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. The Service Industries Journal 23(2), 112–129.

      [11] Ivan S (2015), Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool? Tourism Management 48, 43–53.

      [12] Walsh C, Jakeman P, Moles R, O’Regan B (2008), A comparison of carbon dioxide emissions associated with motorised transport modes and cycling in Ireland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 13(6), 392–399.

      [13] Calvey JC, Shackleton JP, Taylor MD, Llewellyn R (2015), Engineering condition assessment of cycling infrastructure: Cyclists’ perceptions of satisfaction and comfort. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 78, 134–143.




Article ID: 24870
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v8i1.2.24870

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.