Designing a Comfortable Educational Environment

  • Authors

    • Lyudmila Borisovna Bakhtigulova
    • Oleg Victorovich Matveev
    • Elena Vyacheslavovna Luchina
    • Yulia Aleksandrovna Mamaeva
    • Anna Aleksandrovna Suchilina
    • Victoria Vyacheslavovna Vizaulina
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24319
  • Child, Comfortable educational environment, Parents, Teacher.

  • Introduction. The problem of maintaining the physical health of teachers in educational organizations is discussed in the article in the context of professional “burnout†and conflict prevention. Research methodology. When studying the content and essence of a comfortable educational environment, we were interested in the works that provided for an understanding of the nature of human interaction and reflected the interdependence and communication style of people in direct contact with each other. Research results. The most important factor of external and internal order, determining the content, direction and intensity of work activity, has always been a special atmosphere in the team, which in scientific and social discourse was defined by various terms such as: “microclimateâ€, “moral and psychological microclimateâ€, “sociological microclimateâ€, “comfortable educational environmentâ€. Discussion. Designing refers to the category of innovative creative activity, since it primarily involves a purposeful transformation of reality, the need for which arises whenever there is an awareness of the necessity to move to a prognostic model of an educational or upbringing system. The main purpose of such “educational changes†consists in the possibility for a person himself/herself to learn and self-change during life, to apply knowledge in solving professional tasks. Conclusion. The term “comfortable educational environment" is used to denote a special atmosphere in the team that determines the content, direction and intensity of work activity and manifests itself in such group effects as team members’ mood and opinion, individual well-being, assessment of the person’s living and working conditions in the team. This special atmosphere is regarded on the whole as a result of people’s joint activity, their interpersonal interaction.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Sergeeva MG, Sokolova NL, Ippolitova NV, Tabueva EV, Ilyinskaya IP & Bakhtigulova LB (2018), Psychological and pedagogical support for the social worker’s professional development. Espacios 39(2), 26.

      [2] Milovanov KYu, Nikitina EYe, Sokolova NL & Sergeeva MG (2017), The creative potential of museum pedagogy within the modern society. Espacios 38(40), 27-37.

      [3] Tatarinceva AM, Sergeeva MG, Dmitrichenkova SV, Chauzova VA, Andryushchenko IS & Shaleeva E (2018), F.Lifelong learning of gifted and talented students. Espacios 39(2), 29.

      [4] Mikheeva NF, Popova EA & Ignashina ZN (2017), Teaching Latin-American Spanish in Russia: communication difficulties approach. 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED) Proceedings. Valencia, Spain, 3526-3534.

      [5] Samokhin IS, Sergeeva MG, Tabuyeva EV, Stanchulyak TG & Kolesina EG (2018), Assessment of student’s potential based on the data concerning productivity and psychological comfort of education. Espacios 39(2), 22.

      [6] Ju R, Buldakova NV, Sorokoumova SN, Sergeeva MG, Galushkin AA, Soloviev AA & Kryukova NI (2017), Foresight methods in pedagogical design of university learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13(8), 5281-5293.

      [7] Neverkovich SD, Bubnova IS, Kosarenko NN, Sakhieva RG, Sizova ZhM, Zakharova VL & Sergeeva MG (2018), Students’ Internet Addiction: Study and Prevention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(4), 1483-1495.

      [8] Mukhin MI, Mishatkina MV & Sokolova NL (2017), On the issue of institutional and methodological foundations of teacher’s training. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences 28, 457-465.

      [9] Sergeeva MG, Sinelnikov IYu & Sukhodimtseva AP (2017), Metasubject abilities development in upper secondary school students as a pedagogical problem. Casati, F., Barysheva, G. A., Krieger, W. (Eds.). The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), 531–539.

      [10] Sergeeva MG, Bedenko NN, Karavanova LZh, Tsibizova TYu, Samokhin IS & Anwar MS (2018), Educational company (Technology): Peculiarities of its implementation in the system of professional education. Espacios 39(2), 24.

      [11] Bourina HV & Dunaeva LA (2017), Linguo-didactic environment for teaching foreign-speaking communication in the process of studying French. E-Learning and Digital media 14(6), 331-340.

      [12] Sergeeva MG, Bondarenko NG, Shebzuhova TA, Vartumyan AA & Lesnikova SL (2018), Scientific substantiation of the conception of continuous economic education development. Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication. Special Edition, 178-185.

      [13] Mikheeva NF (2016), II Firsova’s readings: On the international conference “Contemporary Philology and Methodology of Foreign Language Teaching: Basic Tendencies and Development Prospectsâ€. Moscow, April 26–27, 2016. Vestnik rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya Lingvistika [Proceedings of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Section “Linguisticsâ€]. 20(2), 149-151.

      [14] Sergeeva MG & Nikitina EE (2016), Criteria indicators of formation of economic competence of system of the general education. International Conference “Education Environment for the Information Age†(EEIA-2016). Moscow, Russia.

      [15] Mukhin MI, Mishatkina MV, Samokhin IS & Sokolova NL (2017), Health-sustaining environment of an educational institution. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 28, 448-456.

      [16] Sergeeva MG, Flyagina VYu, Taranenko IV, Krasnova EV & Vilkova AV (2017), The interaction of labor market and educational services market considering social partnership mechanism and specificity of the regional educational policy. Ponte 73(12), 2.

      [17] Sergeeva MG, Komarovskaya EP, Bakhtigulova LB, Tabuyeva EV, Kalashnikov PF & Galyuk AD (2018), Educational company: Peculiarities of the technology’s implementation at different educational levels when forming the economic competencies of future specialists. Espacios 39(2), 25.

      [18] Sergeeva MG, Ippolitova NV, Solovyeva AV, Petrova LA, Kunytsina ML & Andryushchenko IS (2018), Verification of management support of the professional and educational trajectory of students in the sociocultural educational environment of the University. Espacios 39(2), 23.

      [19] Sukhodimtseva AP, Sergeeva MG, Donskaya MV, Kupriyanova ME & Tomashevich SB (2018), Metadisciplinarity in education: Solving actual problems. Espacios 39(2), 27.

      [20] Tatarinceva AM, Sokolova NL, Mrachenko EA, Sergeeva MG. & Samokhin IS (2018), Factors determining individual success in Life-long learning. Espacios 39(2), 28.

      [21] Tatarinceva AM, Sokolova NL, Sergeeva MG, Bedenko NN & Samokhin IS (2018), The influence of a psychological and a cognitive component of a student's thinking style on his/her success in lifelong learning. Espacios 39(2), 30.

      [22] Wang S, Gorbunova NV, Masalimova AR, Bírová J & Sergeeva MG (2017), Formation of Academic Mobility of Future Foreign Language Teachers by Means of Media Education Technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(3), 959-976.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Borisovna Bakhtigulova, L., Victorovich Matveev, O., Vyacheslavovna Luchina, E., Aleksandrovna Mamaeva, Y., Aleksandrovna Suchilina, A., & Vyacheslavovna Vizaulina, V. (2018). Designing a Comfortable Educational Environment. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24319