The Needs of Street Furniture in the Pedestrian on Urip Sumoharjo Yogyakarta Street

  • Authors

    • Ilham Berlian Putrayasa
    • Retna Hidayah
    • Asnul Dahar Minghat
    2018-12-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23520
  • Public Perception, Street Furniture, Pedestrian.

  • The background of the pedestrian in Urip Sumoharjo Yogyakarta street which conditions are not comfortable for pedestrians to pass, so as to improve the comfort of the pedestrian, in this study try to understand street furniture needed for pedestrian comfort in pedestrians on Urip Sumoharjo Yogyakarta street. Data was collected using a survey method with a questionnaire containing closed questions. The data analysis technique used in this research is quantitative descriptive data analysis. Based on the results of the study showed that men prefer to walk than women, the time when people decide to walk most choose when they go to exercise, the distance traveled by people when deciding to walk is 300-600 meters, street furniture is very much needed for pedestrian comfort in the pedestrian on Urip Sumoharjo Yogyakarta street are street lights, bins, seating, and public toilets. While pedestrians are needed enough are traffic signs, shelters, bollards, and road guardrail. Pedestrians need less is flower pots, fountains and warnings, and waste containers.

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Diansya, I. (2015). Penilaian jalur pedestrian oleh masyarakat urban dan kriteria jalur pedestrian yang ideal menurut masyarakat. Jurnal Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI, 1(3), 33-40.

      [2] Rubenstein, H. (1992). Pedestrian malls, streetscapes, and urban spaces. John Wiley and Sons.

      [3] Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. VNR Company.

      [4] Ashadi, Houtrina, R., & Setiawan, N. (2012). Analisa pengaruh elemen-elemen pelengkap jalur pedestrian terhadap kenyamanan pejalan kaki studi kasus: Pedestrian Orchard Road Singapura. Jurnal Nalars, 11(1), 77-90.

      [5] Gage, M., & Vandenberg, M. (1975). Hard landscape in concrete. The Architectural Press.

      [6] Wardiyanto, & Baiquni, M. (2011). Perencanaan dan pengembangan Pariwisata. Lubuk Agung.

      [7] Ma’aruf, Z., & Arief, A. M. R. (2016). Tanggapan pengunjung tentang fasilitas street furnitures di kawasan Wisata Hapanasa Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, 3(2), 1-14.

      [8] Susanto, A., Siahaan, Z. B., Setiadji, B. H., & Supriyono. (2014). Analisis kinerja lalu lintas Jalan Urip Sumoharjo Yogyakarta. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 456-464.

      [9] Muafani, M. (2014). Pengaruh street furniture jalur pejalan kaki koridor jalan utama pada pusat perdagangan terhadap kenyamanan pengguna. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ, 1(3), 171-189.

      [10] Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step by step guide for beginner. Sage Publications.

      [11] Sugiyono, I. (2009). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

      [12] De Chiara, J., & Koppelman, L. E. (1985). Urban planning and design criteria. Van Nostrand Co.

      [13] Widjaja, H. (2017). Kajian elemen lanskap street furniture di Lingkungan Bantaran Sungai Cisadane dan Jalur Neglasari di Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Prosiding SNST, 8(7), 35-40.

      Krier, R. (1979). Urban space. Rizzoli International

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Berlian Putrayasa, I., Hidayah, R., & Dahar Minghat, A. (2018). The Needs of Street Furniture in the Pedestrian on Urip Sumoharjo Yogyakarta Street. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.33), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23520