Public Engagement for Objective and Holistic Officials’ Evaluation: an Integrated Political-Social-Legal View

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    This research proposes new model of officials’ evaluation grounded on a belief regarding to the urgency of a framework which embraces socio-political aspects holistically. This is derived from national vision in sustainability development demanding a more transparent, reliable, and competent leadership. Regarding to this, distortions often occur due to governance malpractices in the form of corruption which impact officials’ performance as well as environment conduciveness. This phenomenon is taken as a fundamental paradigm of this research which results in a reasoning stating that officials’ objective evaluation. This research realizes that cannot be done by considering officials as a single-role entity. It must consider several roles which impacts and influences several different parties (political, social, and governmental). This research comprehends such gap through comprehensive literature review and transforms all theories in the purpose of building a systematic assessment methodology which captures various aspects from different perspective. In its discussion, this model is proven academically to be able to evaluate officials’ performance objectively through three broad parameters: (1) policies formulation, (2) social engagement, and (3) regulatory submission. In addition, those three categorical assessment would be integrated in a weighted-average system, enabling them to produce a numerical score. In this stage, this framework is applied through information technology is used to capture data from different respondents.



  • Keywords

    Corruption, Social Perception, Officials’ Evaluation, Public Policy, Local Administrative Law, State Governance.

  • References

      [1] Sanderson IaN, Policy D, Book M, Evans M, Azwan K, Kamal M, Hezri Aa (2014), What is the Policy Problem? Methodological Challenges in Policy Evaluation. International Federation of Accountants 30(4), 1–22.

      [2] Marume SBM (2016), Meaning of Public Administration. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science 4(6), 15–20.

      [3] Tsay B-Y (2010), Designing an internal control assessment program using COSO’s guidance on monitoring. CPA Journal, May, 52–57. Retrieved from

      [4] Black BS (2001), The Core Fiduciary Duties of Outside Directors. Asia Business Law Review 16(219), 3–16. Retrieved from

      [5] Thorburn M (2011), Criminal Law as Public Law. In Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law.

      [6] Thompson DF (1980), Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands. American Political Science Review 74(04), 905–916.

      [7] Association of Certified Faud Examiners (2014), Report To the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Global Fraud Study 15(2), 1–80.

      [8] Carr I (2007), Corruption, legal solutions and limits of law. International Journal of Law in Context 3(3), 227–255.

      [9] Raadschelders JCN (2011), Public Administration. Public Administration: The Interdisciplinary Study of Government, 16.

      [10] Dryden-Peterson S & Mulimbi B (2017), Pathways toward Peace: Negotiating National Unity and Ethnic Diversity through Education in Botswana. Comparative Education Review 61(1), 58–82.

      [11] Elkington J (2013), Enter the triple bottom line. In The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up 1–16.

      [12] Nyman C, Nilsson F & Rapp B (2005), Accountability in local government: a principal‐agent perspective. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting 9(2), 123–137.

      [13] Kuromiya H, (2014), Stalin’s Great Terror and the Asian Nexus. Europe - Asia Studies 66(5), 775–793.

      [14] Rutgers MR & Overeem P (2014), Public Values in Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

      [15] Alesina A, Ozler S, Roubini N & Swagel P (1992), Political Stability and Economic Growth. National Bureau of Economic Research 1, 1–35.

      [16] Pigou AC (1920), The Economics of Welfare. Library.

      [17] Radhika D (2012), Ethics in Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research 4(2), 23–31.

      [18] Wibowo A & Alfen HW (2015), Government-led critical success factors in PPP infrastructure development. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 5(1), 121–134.

      [19] LaFree G & Morris N (2004), Corruption as a global social problem. In Handbook of Social Problems: A Comparative International Perspective 600–618.

      [20] Transparency International (2017), Corruption Perception Index 2017. Retrieved from 2017 Global Report English.pdf

      [21] Sasmoko, Widhoyoko SA, Ariyanto & Indrianti (2017), Corruption Early Prevention: Decision Support System for President of the Republic of Indonesia. International Conference on Computing and Applied Informatics 801, 1–8.

      [22] Noerlina, Wulandhari LA, Sasmoko, Muqsith AM & Alamsyah M (2017), Corruption Cases Mapping Based on Indonesia’s Corruption Perception Index. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 801.

      [23] Widhoyoko SA, Sasmoko, Nasir LA, Manalu S & Indrianti Y (2018), W . a . w ( we are watching ) smart app : accommodating social perception towards public officers ’ performance W . a . w ( we are watching ) smart app : accommodating social perception towards public o fficers ’ performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 978.

      [24] Widhoyoko SA (2018), Improvement of Indonesian Centralized Procurement as a Managerial Tool for Good Governance Practices in Corruption Prevention. Advanced Science Letters 24(1), 328–330.

      [25] Robertson-Snape F (1999), Corruption, collusion and nepotism in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly 20(3), 589–602.

      [26] Snider KF (2006), Procurement Leadership: From Means to Ends. Journal of Public Procurement 6(3), 274–294.

      [27] Ionescu L (2012), Democracy and political corruption. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 7(2), 173–178. Retrieved from

      [28] Argandoña A (2017), Petty Corruption – Facilitating Payments and Grease Money. In The Handbook of Business and Corruption 49–70.

      [29] Heidenheimer A, Johnston M & Le Vine VT (1989), Political corruption : a handbook. Political Science.

      [30] Widhoyoko SA (2017), Fraud in Rights and Contracts A Review of Bankruptcy Case of Livent Inc..pdf. Binus Business Review 8(1), 31–39.

      [31] Nations U (2004), Practical Anti-Corruption Measures For Prosecutors And Investigators. Retrieved from

      [32] Wells JT (2011), Corporate Fraud Handbook (3rd Editio). Wiley International.

      [33] Verheijen T (2001), Politico-Administrative Relations - Who Rules. The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved from

      [34] Chemin M (2008), Do Criminal Politicians Reduce Corruption? Evidence from India. Working Paper, (September).

      [35] Santos-Chaves AC (2013), A corrupção privada no Brasil ( Private Corruption in Brazil ). Revista Jurídica ESMP-SP 4, 231–260.

      [36] Gilbert LD & Allen F (2014), Democracy and good governance: The missing link in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5(16), 524–531.

      [37] Starr SB (2007), Extraordinary Crimes at Ordinary Times : International Justice Beyond Crisis Situations. Northwestern University Law Review 101(133), 1–63.

      [38] Kim DS, Li Y & Tarzia D (2018), Value of corruption in China: Evidence from anti-corruption investigation. Economics Letters 164, 112–116.

      [39] Niasa L, Karim HMS, Sofyan A & Muchtar S (2016), Corruption Eradication In The Perspective Of Criminology. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 5(07), 124–127.

      [40] Vidal F (1993), Psychology in the 18th century: A view from encyclopaedias. History of the Human Sciences 6(1), 89–119.

      [41] Prabowo HY & Cooper K (2016), Re-understanding corruption in the Indonesian public sector through three behavioral lenses. Journal of Financial Crime 23(4), 1028–1062.

      [42] Bem DJ (1967), Self-Perception : an Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive. Psychological Review 74(3), 183–200.

      [43] Alexander R (2004), The Role of Whistleblower in the Fight Against Economic Crime. Journal of Financial Crime 12(2), 131–138.

      [44] Margono G (2015), Multidimensional Reliability of Instrument for Measuring Students ’ Attitudes Toward Statistics by Using Semantic Differential Scale. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 49–53.

      [45] Andersson S & Heywood PM (2009), The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies 57(4), 746–767.

      [46] Adams G (1981), The Iron Triangle: The Politics of Defense Contracting. The Nation. Retrieved from

      [47] Aragonès E, Palfrey T & Postlewaite A (2007), Political reputations and campaign promises. Journal of the European Economic Association 5(4), 846–884.

      [48] Granato J & Wong MCS (2004), Political campaign advertising dynamics. Political Research Quarterly 57(3), 349–361.

      [49] Constitution de la République Française (1958), Retrieved from

      [50] Gemeentewet (1992).

      [51] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.32 (2004). Indonesia.

      [52] Order of the President No.31 (2000), Republic of China.

      [53] Constitution of the Russian Federation (1993), Russia.

      [54] Constitution 73rd Amendment Act (1992), India. Retrieved from

      [55] Local Government Act, Law of Malaysia § (1979), Malaysia.

      [56] Local Government Act (2002), United Kingdom. Retrieved from

      [57] Local Government (General) Regulation (2005), Australia. Retrieved from

      [58] U.S Code Title 42 (2011), United States of America. Retrieved from

      [59] Barkin D & Lemus B (2014), Rethinking the social and solidarity society in light of community practice. Sustainability (Switzerland) 6(9), 6432–6445.

      [60] title42/USCODE-2010-title42-chap68-subchapIV-B-partA-sec5196

      [61] Kaufmann D & Vicente PC (2011), Legal corruption. Economics and Politics 23(2), 195–219.

      [62] Guba EG (1990), The Paradigm Dialog. The paradigm dialog.




Article ID: 18247
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18247

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.