Contractor Selection Criteria: a Study on Malaysian Public Construction Projects

  • Authors

    • Izwan Rashid
    • Syuhaida Ismail
    • Zainai Mohamed
    • Abd. Latif Saleh
    2018-08-14
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17471
  • Contractor Selection, Selection Criteria, Construction Projects, Public Projects, Malaysia.
  • The complexity of a construction project renders the implementation of a systematic approach in selecting contractors to be of vital importance, especially for the public construction projects. Nevertheless, public construction projects in Malaysia often suffer from delay, over budget and low-quality issues. These are very much affected by the contractors who tend to manipulate the tender price with the sole intention of getting the contract, thus led to many issues throughout the projects delivery. Hence, this paper is aimed to investigate a list of contractor selection criteria for public construction projects in Malaysia. A total of 43 selection criteria have been identified and categorised into seven categories from an initial review via content analysis. These findings were then verified via a questionnaire survey, which was responded by 276 local Malaysian construction industry practitioners. Data collected were analysed using the IBM Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS). The analysis showed that all 43 selection criteria were significant in selecting contractors. It is hoped that the findings of this paper would encourage the governing bodies and authorities to consider the use of multi criteria assessment in selecting contractors for public construction projects, rather than being solely reliant on the tendered price.

     

  • References

    1. [1] I. Aje, “The impact of contractors’ prequalification on construction project delivery in Nigeria,†Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2012.

      [2] A. Movahedian Attar, M. Khanzadi, S. Dabirian, and E. Kalhor, “Forecasting contractor’s deviation from the client objectives in prequalification model using support vector regression,†Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 924–936, 2013.

      [3] J. R. San Cristóbal, “Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods,†J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 751–758, 2012.

      [4] L. Liu, Y. Zhou, and H. Zhu, “A conceptual framework for vendor selection based on supply chain risk management from a literature,†J. Syst. Manag. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2011.

      [5] R. A. Khan, “Role of Construction Sector in Economic Growth : Empirical Evidence from Pa,†Adv. Interating Constr. Dev. Contries, pp. 279–290, 2008.

      [6] G. Ofori, “Nature of the Construction Industry , Its Needs and Its Development : A Review of Four Decades of Research,†vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2015.

      [7] B. R. Sarker, P. J. Egbelu, T. W. Liao, and J. Yu, “Planning and design models for construction industry: A critical survey,†Autom. Constr., vol. 22, pp. 123–134, 2012.

      [8] L. Crawford, J. Pollack, and D. England, “Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years,†Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–184, 2006.

      [9] Project Management Institute, A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide). 2013.

      [10] Association for Project Management, Association for Project Management Body of Knowledge, vol. 6th Editio. 2012.

      [11] Project Management Institute, Construction Extension to the PMBOK Guide. 2016.

      [12] M. S. El-abbasy, T. Zayed, M. Asce, M. Ahmed, H. Alzraiee, and M. Abouhamad, “Contractor Selection Model for Highway Projects Using Integrated Simulation and Analytic Network Process,†J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 139, no. 7, pp. 755–767, 2013.

      [13] A. Khan, M. S. Lodhi, M. I. Qureshi, I. Naseem, Y. Javed, and K. Zaman, “Management of project changes in construction companies: Case of Pakistan,†World Appl. Sci. J., 2014.

      [14] P. Jaskowski, S. Biruk, and R. Bucon, “Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment,†Autom. Constr., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 120–126, 2010.

      [15] D. Puri and S. Tiwari, “Evaluating The Criteria f or Contractors ’ Selection and Bid Evaluation,†Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 44–48, 2014.

      [16] N. Ibadov, “Contractor selection for construction project, with the use of fuzzy preference relation,†Procedia Eng., vol. 111, pp. 317–323, 2015.

      [17] H. Hosseini Nasab and M. Mirghani Ghamsarian, “A fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making model for contractor prequalification,†J. Decis. Syst., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 433–448, 2015.

      [18] A. Jafari, “A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method,†Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 746–760, 2013.

      [19] A. Idrus, M. Sodangi, and M. A. Amran, “Decision criteria for selecting main contractors in Malaysia,†Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1358–1365, 2011.

      [20] D. J. Watt, B. Kayis, and K. Willey, “The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria,†Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2010.

      [21] M. Balubaid and R. Alamoudi, “Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multi-Criteria Analysis for Contractor Selection,†Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, pp. 581–589, 2015.

      [22] R. H. Alias, N. M. M. Noor, M. Y. M. Saman, M. L. Abdullah, and A. Selamat, “Contractor selection using fuzzy comparison judgement,†in 2011 5th Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering, MySEC 2011, 2011, pp. 388–392.

      [23] B. Somekh and C. Lewin, “Methods in the Social Science,†Sage, London, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2005.

      [24] R. V Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities Robert,†Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 607–610, 1970.

      [25] W. K. Olsen, Data collection : key debates and methods in social research. London: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012.

      [26] M. Gündüz, Y. Nielsen, and M. Özdemir, “Quantification of Delay Factors Using the Relative Importance Index Method for Construction Projects in Turkey,†J. Manag. Eng., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2012.

      [27] N. Aziz et al., “Relative importance index (RII) in ranking of procrastination factors among university students,†AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1761, no. 1, p. 20022, 2016.

      [28] H. Doloi, “Analysis of pre-qualification criteria in contractor selection and their impacts on project success,†Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1245–1263, 2009.

      [29] K. A. Pituch and J. P. Stevens, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 2016.

      [30] K. L. Tiong, Z. Norhayati Mohmad, M. Z. M. Saman, M. S. Md Arif, and A. Z. Bahari, “Implementation of Quality Management System in Malaysian Construction Industry,†Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 903, no. November, pp. 359–364, 2014.

      [31] M. R. Abdullah, I. A. Rahman, and A. A. A. Azis, “Causes of Delay in MARA Management Procurement Construction Projects,†J. Surv. Constr. Prop., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 123–138, 2010.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Rashid, I., Ismail, S., Mohamed, Z., & Latif Saleh, A. (2018). Contractor Selection Criteria: a Study on Malaysian Public Construction Projects. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.25), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17471