Constructive basis for the development of the extreme zones of Siberia and the Russian arctic

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    he paper describes the constructive basis for building and structure designing in the difficult regions of Siberia and the Russian Arctic and development of a new approach to the design of buildings and structures in the Russian Arctic in the face of climate change. Severe climate and weather conditions of the northwestern territories of Russia are rapidly changing due to the global warming. The structural changes in development and construction, following this irreversible process, are highlighted and discussed in relation to the foundations and constructive systems. The paper provides an overview of methods and technological approaches to the extreme zone construction. The application of modern methods of design and construction with the involvement of competent "practitioners" increases the pace of construction and reduces its cost; Architectural and constructive solutions should focus on the developing areas of business and tourism. We suggest the possible protective measures against the transgression of the World Ocean and thawing of the permafrost. The term “special Arctic bases”, denoting the new type of settlements in the Russian Arctic, is introduced. The introduction of constructive solutions and the development of planning solutions for the bases will help to ensure a stable activity in the region.



  • Keywords

    Global Warming; Permafrost; Caisson Foundations; Transportation; Water Aggression.

  • References

      [1] Ewing, M., Donn, W. (1956). Theory of Ice Ages, Science, 123(3207), 1061-1066.

      [2] Boyarintsev, V.I. (2011). The great M. V. Lomonosov: the beginning of the Russian science. Moscow: Pskov Renaissance.

      [3] Lukin, Y.F. (2016). Arctic tourism: the rating of regions, the opportunities and threats, Arctic and The Nord, 23. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0220-y.

      [4] Ershov, R.V. (2015). National Park "Russian Arctic", Arctic Bulletin, 3, 116-123.

      [5] Shats, M.M. (2010). The stumbling block of permafrost, or time to save the permafrost, Territory and Planning, 3. Retrieved from:

      [6] Pavlov, A.V. (2000). Permafrost and modern climate, Priroda, 4: 2000, 9-18.

      [7] Mazur V.N. (2016). Effective foundations for the permafrost conditions. Retrieved from:

      [8] Sharakshane S. (2015). Global warming and global cooling. Scientific Russia, 3. Retrieved from:

      [9] Osnovin, V.N., Shulyakov, L.V., Dubyago, D.S. (2006). Handbook on the construction materials and products, Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix Publishing.

      [10] Olsen M.S., Callaghan T.V., Reist J.D., Reiersen L.O. et al. (2016). The changing arctic cryosphere and likely consequences: an overview. In Callaghan T.V., Johansson M., Prowse T.D. (Eds). The Changing Arctic Cryosphere and likely Consequences. Ambio, 40, doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0220-y.




Article ID: 11602
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.11602

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.