Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Rehabilitation in Pediatric Patients- A Case Series

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dr. Monideepa Mitra Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata
  • Dr. Ankit Bapat Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata
  • Dr Shreyasi Chakraborty Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata
  • Dr Soumen Pal Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata

About this article

Download PDF

Keywords:

Maryland Bridge, Resin-Bonded Bridge, Fiber-Reinforced Composite, Minimally Invasive Dentistry, Anterior Tooth Replacement, Esthetic Rehabilitation

Abstract

Loss of anterior teeth due to trauma, caries, or developmental anomalies may lead to functional impairment and significant psychosocial distress in children and adolescents, affecting esthetics, self-esteem, and social interaction. This report describes three clinical cases of young patients presenting with missing maxillary anterior teeth, where minimally invasive prosthetic rehabilitation was planned using Maryland bridge designs as a conservative treatment approach. After thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation, treatment was undertaken with two different approaches: in two cases, a resin-reinforced fiber splint–based Maryland bridge was fabricated to enhance retention and stress distribution, while in one case a conventional tooth preparation design was used for retentive wing placement. All procedures were carried out with strict emphasis on preservation of enamel, minimal tooth preparation, and esthetic rehabilitation. The prostheses were evaluated for fit, function, esthetics, and patient satisfaction, and followed up over a short-term period, during which all restorations remained stable without debonding, fracture, or biological complications. Patients reported improved confidence and satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes. Within the limitations of this case series and short follow-up duration, minimally invasive Maryland bridge designs, particularly those reinforced with fiber, appear to be a reliable and conservative treatment option for replacement of missing anterior teeth in young patients.

References

[1] Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2016.

[2] Shillingburg HT Jr, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2012.

[3] Dean JA, Jones JE, Sanders BJ, Vinson LA. McDonald and Avery's dentistry for the child and adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2021.

[4] Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses in the anterior area: a 4.5-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):143-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.019.

[5] Ahmed KE, Li KY, Murray CA. Longevity of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures (FRC FPD)-systematic review. J Dent. 2017;61:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.007.

View more references (8)

[6] Kumbuloglu O, Özcan M. Clinical survival of indirect, anterior 3-unit surface-retained fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis: up to 7.5-years follow-up. J Dent. 2015;43(6):656-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.006.

[7] Heo G, Lee EH, Kim JW, Cho KM, Park SH. Fiber-reinforced composite resin bridges: an alternative method to treat root-fractured teeth. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(1):e8. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e8.

[8] Thilander B, Odman J, Lekholm U. Orthodontic aspects of the use of oral implants in adolescents: a 10-year follow-up study. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(6):715-731. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.6.715.

[9] Van Heumen CCM, Kreulen CM, Creugers NHJ. Clinical studies of fiber-reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00595.x.

[10] Balasubramaniam GR. Predictability of resin bonded bridges - a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2017;222(11):849-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.497.

[11] Miettinen, M., & Millar, B. J. (2013). A review of the success and failure characteristics of resin-bonded bridges. British dental journal, 215(2), E3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.686.

[12] Gupta, A., Yelluri, R. K., & Munshi, A. K. (2015). Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin Bridge: A Treatment Option in Children. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 8(1), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1285.

[13] Wang, Q., Zhong, S., Zhang, C. D., Hu, Y., Liu, F., & Wu, L. A. (2023). Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chi-nese journal of stomatology, 58(11), 1116–1121.


How to Cite

Mitra, D. . M., Bapat, D. A., Chakraborty, D. S., & Pal, D. S. (2026). Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Rehabilitation in Pediatric Patients- A Case Series. Journal of Oral and Dental Sciences, 12(2), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.14419/bwg52492