Impact of loans to farmers on rice production in funtua local government area katsina state, north west Nigeria


  • Aisha Lawal Rumah





Funtua, Loans, Farmers, Rice production, Profits.


This research examined the impact of loans to farmers on rice production in Funtua Local Government Area, Katsina State. Three hy-pothesis; there is no significant difference in the loans lend to farmers for their rice production; there is no significant difference on those farmers that collect loans for rice production and those that did not; there is no significance difference, that loans lend to farmers can affect their production, were tested. The quasi experimental-control group design involving pre and post-tests were used. The target population for this study was thirty thousand, two hundred and thirty one (30,231) farmers within the study Area. The sample of the study consists of one hundred and fifty (150) farmers randomly drawn from five (5) selected towns/villages within the study Area. The data was divided into experimental and control groups. Questionnaire was used in gathering data, the respondents will chose the right opinion running from strongly agreed, agreed, uncertain, disagreed and strongly disagreed based on their experience or perception. Percentage score, Mean and standard deviation of differences between the mean impact of loan to farmers on rice production of experimental and control group and gender were used to answer research questions. The null hypothesis were tested with the aid of SPSS Package using ANOVA and t-test at p =0.05 level of significance. The result obtained shows that: there is no significant difference between farmers that collect loan and those that did not within the mean of 2.4533 and 1.8800 respectively.


[1] Deveze, J.C. 2000. Comment promouvoir le fianncement des exploitation families? Graindesel no16-november 2000.

[2] Diagne, A. 1999. Impact of Access to Credit on Household Technical efficiency and Productivity in Growing Maize and Tobacco in Malawi. Visiting Research Follow Report. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. 28p.

[3] Diagne, A. and Zeller, M. 2001. Access to Credit and Its Impact on Welfare in Malawi. Research Report 116 International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, D.C. 169p.

[4] Diagne, A. 2002. Impact of Access to Credit on Maize and Tobacco Productivity in Malawi. In Manfred Zeller and Richard L. Meyer (eds.). The Triangle of Microfinance: Financial Sustainability, Outreach and Impact. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.

[5] Diao, X., Hazell, P., Resnick, D., and Thurlow, J. 2007. The role agriculture in development: implication for sub-Saharan Africa. International Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Research Report 153. IFPRI, Washington DC.

[6] Fall, A.A. 2008. Impact du credit sur le revenue des reziculteurs de la valee du fleuve Senegal. These pour l’obtention du diplome de Doctorat en Economie et Gestation du Development Agricle, Agro-alimentaire et Rurale. Universite Montpellier I.

[7] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2013. Rice Market Monitor. Agricultural Statistics. FAO, Rome.

[8] Hounlonkou, A.N., Acclassato, D., and Kokou, R. 2005. Impacts de la Microfinance sur la Reduction de la Pauvrete au Benin. Rapport d’etude. Association Nationale des Practiciens de la Microfinance- Consortium Alafia. Benin.

[9] Kodjo, M.K.Z., Abiassi, E.H., Allagba, M.C. 2003. Le financement de l’agriculture beninoise dan un context de liberalization: contribution de la micro finance. ELIFID, Benin. MAEP (Ministere de l’Agriculture, de l’Elevage et de la Peche). 2011. Strategie Nationale pour le Developpement de la Riziculture (SNDR) au Benin, Cotounou, Benin.

[10] MAEP (Ministere de l’Agriculture, de l’elevage et de la Peche), 2010. Plan Strategique de Relance du Secteur Agricole (PSRSA). MAEP, Cotonou, benin. 69p.

[11] Manski, C.F. and Pepper, J.V. 2000. Monotone Instrumental Variables: wityh an Application to the Returns to Schooling. Econometrica 68 (4): 997-1010.

[12] Morduch, J. 1998. Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence from Flagship Programs in Bangladesh. Working Papers 198, Pinceton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies. OCS (Observation du Changement Social), 2010. Rapport Profile Social National, edition 2009: Microfinance et pauvrete. MPDEPP-CAG, Cotonou, Benin.

[13] Otsuka Keijiro, Donald F. Larson, and Peter B. R. Hazell. 2013. An overview. In A Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: Finding Ways to Boost Productivity on Small Farms. Edited by Keijiro Otsuka and Donald F. Larson. 318 pp. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London. ISBN-13: 978-9400757592.

[14] Robinson, P.R. 2001. Observational Studies. Second Edition. Agricultrue and Human Values, Spinger-Verlag. New York.

[15] Seck, P.A., Togola, A., Toure, A., and Diagne, A. 2013. Propositions pour une optimization des performances de la riziculture en Afrique de l’Ouest. Cah agric 22: 361-8. Doi 10.1684/agr.2013.0646.

[16] Simtowe F. and Phiri, M.A.R. 2007. To what extent are credit constraint responsible for nonseparable behavior at household level. Evidence from rural Malawi. Journal of Applied Sciences 6(7): 1377-1399.

[17] Simtowe, F., Diagne A., and Zeller, M. 2008. Who is credit constrained? Evidence from Rural Malawi, Agricultural Finance Review 68(2): 255 – 272.

[18] Solesbury, W. 2003. Sustainable Livelihoods: A Case Study of the Evolution of DFID Policy. Working Paper 217. Overseas development Institute, 111 Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7JD, UK.

Additional Files