Mix research methods: teaching and learning in 2nd year bachelor nursing program

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Background: Nursing profession and its development, no doubt plays a crucial role in healthcare sectors. Students’ learning approaches are now being recognized across higher education as having a considerable effect on student achievement’ and their learning outcomes. The learning process in nursing education has always been a challenge to find pedagogical instructional methods that can engage learners actively and help the students to understand concepts for new applications in theoretical and practical situation.

    Purpose: The aim of this research study is to compare the effect of sequencing theory via classroom lecturing before practical clinical skill taught in laboratories and visa versa on students learning readiness and approaches.

    Methods: The research method of this study employed a mixed research methods by the implication of both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative research method was conducted by means of two validated questionnaires. The first questionnaire used is the Self- Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education (SDLRSNE). This is a self-reporting instrument designed to assess stu-dents' attitudes, abilities, and personality characteristics necessary for self- directed learning. The second questionnaire is the Revised two-factor version of the Study Process (R-SPQ-2F) in order to assess students’ deep or surface learning approaches. The qualitative research was conducted via students reflection on their learning experience via the use of free text comments in Blackboard Learning Management System (LMS) environment. The study sample included 97 nursing students. Students were divided into two groups A and B. Each group consisted of 47 nursing students.

    Results: Significant differences between group ‘A’ and group ‘B’ were found for SDLRSNE self-management, desire for learning and self-control, suggesting that self-management in group ‘A’ managed their learning better than group ‘B’. There were no significant differences in terms of learning approaches between group ‘A’ and B.

    Conclusion: This study highlights that students teaching and learning experiences are sensitive to learning environments. This was done through sequencing theoretical and clinical teaching and visa versa in a nursing course. Proper design of the learning environment and the availability of supportive learning tools encourage students learning and teaching experience.


  • Keywords


    Learning Approaches; Nurse Education; Self-Directed Learning; Learning Environments; Saudi Arabia.

  • References


      [1] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning Theory (1st ed.): Prentice-Hall.

      [2] Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 133-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433.

      [3] Boynton, P. M. (2004). Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire. BMJ, 328(7452), 1372-1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1372.

      [4] Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

      [5] Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the Special Issue. Higher Education, 22(3), 201-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00132287.

      [6] Falk, K., Falk, H., & Ung, E. J. (2015). When practice precedes theory e A mixed methods evaluation of students' learning experiences in an undergraduate study program in nursing. Nurse Education in Practice, 16, 14-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.05.010.

      [7] Farnan, J. M., Gaffney, S., Poston, J. T., Slawinski, K., Cappaert, M., Kamin, B., & Arora, V. M. (2016). Patient safety room of horrors: a novel method to assess medical students and entering residents' ability to identify hazards of hospitalisation. BMJ Qual Saf, 25(3), 153-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004621.

      [8] Federico, PA. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 359–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00021-2.

      [9] Feingold, C. E., Cobb, M. D., Givens, R. H., Arnold, J., Keller, J. L., & Joslin, S. (2008). Student Perceptions of Team Learning in Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(5), 214-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20080501-03.

      [10] Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589.

      [11] Fisher MJ (2010). The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for nursing education revisited: a confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020.

      [12] Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & R. Je ries, P. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A Longitudinal, Randomized, Controlled Study Replacing Clinical Hours with Simulation in Prelicensure Nursing Education. JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 5(2).

      [13] Justicia, F., Pichardo, M. C., Cano, F., Berbén, A. B. G., & Fuente, J. D. l. (2008). The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 355-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173004.

      [14] Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839879.

      [15] Lasiter, S. (2014). "The button": initiating the patient-nurse interaction. Clinical Nursing Research, 23(2), 188-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1054773813479794.

      [16] Mackintosh-Franklin, C. (2016). Pedagogical principles underpinning undergraduate Nurse Education in the UK: A review. Nurse Education Today, 40, 118–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.015.

      [17] Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography — describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516.

      [18] McGill.CA. (2016). Nursing in today's society. Ingram School of Nursing. Retrieved from https://www.mcgill.ca/nursing/outreach/today

      [19] Reid, W. A., Duvall, E., & Evans, P. (2007). Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in Year Two medical students. Medical Education, 41(8), 754-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02801.x.

      [20] Ismaile, S. (2014). Nursing Studies: Promoters and Barriers for Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines among Nurses. (Ph.D. Dissertation Doctoral), Medicine, Pharmacy and Health School, Durham University, UK, UK. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10893/

      [21] Scouller, K. M., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students' Experiences in Studying for Multiple Choice Question Examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 267-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331381870.

      [22] Scully, N. J. (2011). The theory-practice gap and skill acquisition: an issue for nursing education. Collegian, 18(2), 93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2010.04.002.

      [23] Stoddart, K. M. (2012). Social meanings and understandings in patient-nurse interaction in the community practice setting: a grounded theory study. BMC Nursing, 11, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-14.

      [24] Wellard, S. J., Bethune, E., & Heggen, K. (2007). Assessment of learning in contemporary nurse education: Do we need standardised examination for nurse registration? Nurse Education Today, 27(1), 68-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.04.002.

      [25] Weller, M. (2002). Delivering Learning on the Net: The Why, What and How of Online Education: Kogan Page Limited.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 6340
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijans.v5i2.6340




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.