A Blended Learning Model of Peer Support Training Program for Women with Breast Cancer
Abstract
Objectives: Peer support is an important social support for cancer patients. A blended learning model of peer support training program in breast cancer was tested for feasibility.
Methods: We developed a peer support training program for women with breast cancer with a blended learning approach combining face-to-face methods with e-learning. After face-to-face orientation, a 20-session e-learning program was provided on the Web followed by a one-day workshop including role playing. Log-files were recorded to assess the pattern of use in the e-learning program. The usability and acceptability were assessed by an evaluation questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed over time (baseline, post-program, and 3-month follow-up) using repeated measured one-way analysis of variance.
Results: Twenty-eight women with breast cancer experience were recruited to the study. The rates of retention and assessment completion were high (92.9% and 89.3%, respectively). Participants favorably rated on the usability of the program. The mean time taken to complete the total of 20 sessions in the e-learning program was 18.69 days. There were no adverse psychosocial effects on the participants.
Conclusions: The blended learning model of the breast cancer peer support training program was feasible and well accepted by the peer support volunteers.
About this article
References
N. Doyle, Cancer survivorship: evolutionary concept analysis, J Adv Nurs 62, 4 (2008), 499-509.
M. Carey, S. Lambert, R. Smits et al, The unfulfilled promise: a systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients, Support Care Cancer 20 (2012), 207-219.
A. Montazeri, Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007, J Exp Clin Cancer Res 27 (2008), 32.
PJ. Goodwin, M. Leszcz, M Ennis et al, The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer, New Engl J Med 345, 24 (2001), 1719-1726.
J. Giese-Davis, C. Bliss-Isberg, K. Carson et al, Brief Repost: The effect of peer counseling on quality of life following diagnosis of breast carcinoma: An observational study, Psychooncology 15, 11 (2006), 1014-1022.
View more references (22)
M. L. Kwan, I. J. Ergas, C. P. Somkin et al, Quality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study, Breast Cancer Res Treat 123, 2, (2010), 507-524.
M. Epplein, Y. Zheng, W, Zheng et al, Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival, J Clin Oncol 29, 4 (2011), 406-412.
R. E. Gray, M. Fitch, C. Davis et al, A qualitative study of breast cancer self-help groups Psychooncology 6 (1997), 279-289.
L. M. Hoey, S. C. Ieropoli, V. M. White et al, Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer, Patient Educ Couns 70, 3 (2008), 315-337.
J. Usshera, L. Kirstena, P. Butowb, M. Sandovala, What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer, Social Science & Medicine 62, (2006) 2565–2576.
P. Arnstein, M. Vidal, C. Wells-Federman et al, From chronic pain pa¬tient to peer: benefits and risks of volunteer¬ing, Pain Manag Nurs 3 (2002), 94-103.
[12] M. Price, B. Phyllis, L. Kirsten, Support and training needs of cancer support group leaders: a review, Psycho-Oncology 15 (2006), 651-663.
P. Butow, D. MPH, J. Ussher, Sustaining Leaders of Cancer Support Groups: The Role, Needs, and Difficulties of Leaders, Social Work in Health Care 42, 2, (2005).
C. Stevinson, A. Lydon, Z. Amir, Characteristics of professionally-led and peer-led cancer support groups in the United Kingdom, J Cancer Surviv 4 (2010), 31-338.
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2007) Cancer Control Act. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw2/part2/p3_0026.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2012.
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2010) Interim Report of Cancer Control Act. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/gan_keikaku.html. Accessed January 31, 2012.
S. W. Chen, J. Stocker, R. H. Wang et al. Evaluation of self-regulatory online learning in a blended course for post-registration nursing students in Taiwan, Nurse Educ Today 29, 7 (2009), 704-709.
D. A. Cook, Internet-Based learning in the Health Professions A meta-analysis, JAMA 300, 10 (2008), 1181-1196.
M. J. Brady, D. F. Cella, F. Mo et al, Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument, J Clin Oncol 15, 3 (1997), 974-986.
K. Shimozuma, N. Eguchi, Development and clinical application of QOL measurement instruments for cancer patients (I), 2001 – Development of the Japanese version of QOL questionnaires developed in the West and validation of reliability and validity of “FACT-B,” a QOL questionnaire for breast cancer patients (in Japanese) http://www.jmari.med.or.jp/research/dl.php?no=47. Accessed January 18, 2012.
S. Oba, N, Takatsuka, C. Nagata et al, Causal attributions to epidemiological risk factors and their associations to later psychological adjustment among Japanese breast cancer patients, Support Care Cancer 17 (2009), 3-9.
S. Shima, T. Shikano, T. Kitamura, A new self-report depression scale, Psychiatry 27, 1985, 717-723 (in Japanese).
L. S. Radloff, The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population, Appl Psychol Measurement 1, 3 (1977), 385-401.
T. Akechi, M. Fukue-Saeki, A. Kugaya et al, Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale, Psychooncology 9, 2000, 395-401.
M. Watson, S. Greer, J. Young et al, Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale, Psychol Med 18 (1988), 203-209.
N. A. Kinnane, T. Waters, S. Aranda, Evaluation of a pilot ‘peer support’ training programme for volunterrs in a hospital-based cancer information and support center. Support Care Cancer 19, 2011, 81-90.
M. Abrain, M. Abrain, M. J. Campbell, C. L. Cooper et al, What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy, BMC Med Res Methodol 10 (2010), 67.